From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com,
memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@kernel.org, yatsenko@meta.com,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/1] bpf: Refactor dynptr mutability tracking
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 15:20:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <177661200533.792430.5113320175620829361.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260414191014.1218567-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 12:10:14 -0700 you wrote:
> Redefine dynptr mutability and fix inconsistency in the verifier and
> kfunc signatures. Dynptr mutability is at two levels. The first is
> the bpf_dynptr structure and the second is the memory the dynptr points
> to. The verifer currently tracks the mutability of the bpf_dynptr struct
> through helper and kfunc prototypes, where "const struct bpf_dynptr *"
> means the structure itself is immutable. The second level is tracked
> in upper bit of bpf_dynptr->size in runtime and is not changed in this
> patch.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v3,1/1] bpf: Refactor dynptr mutability tracking
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/31f61ac33032
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-19 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-14 19:10 [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/1] bpf: Refactor dynptr mutability tracking Amery Hung
2026-04-18 20:59 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-19 15:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=177661200533.792430.5113320175620829361.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox