From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, jose.marchesi@oracle.com,
kernel-team@fb.com, martin.lau@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 16:40:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <177869043880.3729534.11654394350073284356.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513044949.2382019-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 12 May 2026 21:49:49 -0700 you wrote:
> Currently, bpf function calls and kfunc's are limited by 5 reg-level
> parameters. For function calls with more than 5 parameters,
> developers can use always inlining or pass a struct pointer
> after packing more parameters in that struct although it may have
> some inconvenience. But there is no workaround for kfunc if more
> than 5 parameters is needed.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v4,01/25] bpf: Convert bpf_get_spilled_reg macro to static inline function
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ede2dc5c6b57
- [bpf-next,v4,02/25] bpf: Remove copy_register_state wrapper function
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1cb229a54af1
- [bpf-next,v4,03/25] bpf: Add helper functions for r11-based stack argument insns
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/78bbe61632f1
- [bpf-next,v4,04/25] bpf: Set sub->arg_cnt earlier in btf_prepare_func_args()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3ab5bd317ee2
- [bpf-next,v4,05/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for bpf functions
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/0f6bd5e7a804
- [bpf-next,v4,06/25] bpf: Refactor jmp history to use dedicated spi/frame fields
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3a656670fd6d
- [bpf-next,v4,07/25] bpf: Add precision marking and backtracking for stack argument slots
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/0a0fdc64b68c
- [bpf-next,v4,08/25] bpf: Refactor record_call_access() to extract per-arg logic
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/84dd7df76efe
- [bpf-next,v4,09/25] bpf: Use arg_is_fp() in has_fp_args()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f44e815e65a3
- [bpf-next,v4,10/25] bpf: Extend liveness analysis to track stack argument slots
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2af4e792773f
- [bpf-next,v4,11/25] bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programs
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/dc8f1cf6787c
- [bpf-next,v4,12/25] bpf: Prepare architecture JIT support for stack arguments
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/848d624acf66
- [bpf-next,v4,13/25] bpf: Enable r11 based insns
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/9fae4cba3bfd
- [bpf-next,v4,14/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for kfunc calls
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e0b7b91c72db
- [bpf-next,v4,15/25] bpf: Reject stack arguments if tail call reachable
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/35b78733160c
- [bpf-next,v4,16/25] bpf: Disable private stack for x86_64 if stack arguments used
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/cb6af5314056
- [bpf-next,v4,17/25] bpf,x86: Implement JIT support for stack arguments
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/324c3ca6eed6
- [bpf-next,v4,18/25] selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF function stack arguments
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/79e7ec00634e
- [bpf-next,v4,19/25] selftests/bpf: Add tests for stack argument validation
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/9f42204c62d5
- [bpf-next,v4,20/25] selftests/bpf: Add BTF fixup for __naked subprog parameter names
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5b31de88920b
- [bpf-next,v4,21/25] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for stack argument validation
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/00c3ac4292a6
- [bpf-next,v4,22/25] selftests/bpf: Add precision backtracking test for stack arguments
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6e277efbb19d
- [bpf-next,v4,23/25] bpf, arm64: Map BPF_REG_0 to x8 instead of x7
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/68e5627579d7
- [bpf-next,v4,24/25] bpf, arm64: Add JIT support for stack arguments
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/235b2fe772f5
- [bpf-next,v4,25/25] selftests/bpf: Enable stack argument tests for arm64
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/90e43f1b4753
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 4:49 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/25] bpf: Convert bpf_get_spilled_reg macro to static inline function Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/25] bpf: Remove copy_register_state wrapper function Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/25] bpf: Add helper functions for r11-based stack argument insns Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/25] bpf: Set sub->arg_cnt earlier in btf_prepare_func_args() Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for bpf functions Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/25] bpf: Refactor jmp history to use dedicated spi/frame fields Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/25] bpf: Add precision marking and backtracking for stack argument slots Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/25] bpf: Refactor record_call_access() to extract per-arg logic Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/25] bpf: Use arg_is_fp() in has_fp_args() Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/25] bpf: Extend liveness analysis to track stack argument slots Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:44 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/25] bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programs Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/25] bpf: Prepare architecture JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 4:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/25] bpf: Enable r11 based insns Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 14/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for kfunc calls Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 15/25] bpf: Reject stack arguments if tail call reachable Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 16/25] bpf: Disable private stack for x86_64 if stack arguments used Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 5:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 17/25] bpf,x86: Implement JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 18/25] selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF function " Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 19/25] selftests/bpf: Add tests for stack argument validation Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 20/25] selftests/bpf: Add BTF fixup for __naked subprog parameter names Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 21/25] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for stack argument validation Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 22/25] selftests/bpf: Add precision backtracking test for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 23/25] bpf, arm64: Map BPF_REG_0 to x8 instead of x7 Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 24/25] bpf, arm64: Add JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 4:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 25/25] selftests/bpf: Enable stack argument tests for arm64 Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 16:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/25] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-13 17:41 ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 17:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-13 18:11 ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-13 16:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=177869043880.3729534.11654394350073284356.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox