From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, malin89@huawei.com,
ast@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 23:20:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178113360740.3670402.3459348998786835007.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610105539.705887-1-daniel@iogearbox.net>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 12:55:38 +0200 you wrote:
> The fix in commit abad3d0bad72 ("bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local
> storage") is still incomplete. The prog-array compatibility check
> treats a program with no cgroup storage as compatible with any stored
> storage cookie. This allows a storage-less program to bridge a tail
> call chain between an entry program and a storage-using callee even
> though cgroup local storage at runtime still follows the caller's
> context, that is, A -> B(no storage) -> C(storage) path.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,1/2] bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/10627ddc0167
- [bpf-next,2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover tail-call cgroup storage prog-array checks
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/30dee2c176e7
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 10:55 [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays Daniel Borkmann
2026-06-10 10:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover tail-call cgroup storage prog-array checks Daniel Borkmann
2026-06-10 20:15 ` Yonghong Song
2026-06-10 20:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays Yonghong Song
2026-06-10 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178113360740.3670402.3459348998786835007.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=malin89@huawei.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox