BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	memxor@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/6] bpf: Inline the numeric open-coded iterator kfuncs
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:50:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178595221439.468918.12755390994472161307.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804134601.2305303-1-puranjay@kernel.org>

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:

On Tue,  4 Aug 2026 06:45:52 -0700 you wrote:
> The bpf_for(i, start, end) macro is BPF's open-coded numeric iterator. It
> expands into calls to three kfuncs: bpf_iter_num_new() to set the iterator
> up, bpf_iter_num_next() once per iteration, and bpf_iter_num_destroy() to
> tear it down. The verifier emits these as ordinary kfunc calls, so a
> bpf_for() loop pays function-call overhead on setup, teardown, and -- most
> importantly -- on every single iteration via bpf_iter_num_next().
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v5,1/6] bpf: Correct the overflow check comment in bpf_iter_num_next()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8efd87051c3a
  - [bpf-next,v5,2/6] bpf: Inline bpf_iter_num_new() kfunc
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f8f2b567d560
  - [bpf-next,v5,3/6] bpf: Inline bpf_iter_num_next() kfunc
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e93347704878
  - [bpf-next,v5,4/6] bpf: Inline bpf_iter_num_destroy() as a no-op
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/39f047682fe3
  - [bpf-next,v5,5/6] selftests/bpf: Verify inlined numeric iterator shape with __xlated
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b829bc167705
  - [bpf-next,v5,6/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_for() benchmark
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5a1de41147b0

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-05 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04 13:45 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/6] bpf: Inline the numeric open-coded iterator kfuncs Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-04 13:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/6] bpf: Correct the overflow check comment in bpf_iter_num_next() Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-04 14:47   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-04 15:04     ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-04 13:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/6] bpf: Inline bpf_iter_num_new() kfunc Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-04 13:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] bpf: Inline bpf_iter_num_next() kfunc Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-04 13:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/6] bpf: Inline bpf_iter_num_destroy() as a no-op Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-04 13:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/6] selftests/bpf: Verify inlined numeric iterator shape with __xlated Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-04 13:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_for() benchmark Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-05 17:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178595221439.468918.12755390994472161307.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox