From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, emil@etsalapatis.com,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v1 00/10] Misc bug fixes - part 1
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 16:50:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178845422088.3882727.10787208358798363768.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903144433.1716731-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2026 16:44:18 +0200 you wrote:
> A set of miscellaneous fixes for bugs reported by Nicholas. These are
> easy ones and should not require any major discussion, hence batched
> together. See commit logs and selftests for details.
>
> Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi (10):
> bpf: Mark signal tracepoint siginfo arguments as scalar
> selftests/bpf: Cover signal tracepoint siginfo sentinels
> bpf: Reject tail calls directly from callback frames
> selftests/bpf: Test direct tail calls from callbacks
> bpf: Reject resilient lock operations in rbtree callbacks
> selftests/bpf: Reject resilient unlock in rbtree callback
> bpf: Mark sched_process_wait argument as nullable
> selftests/bpf: Test sched_process_wait nullable argument
> bpf: Mark syscall helpers as sleepable
> selftests/bpf: Check syscall helpers in timer callbacks
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf,v1,01/10] bpf: Mark signal tracepoint siginfo arguments as scalar
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/77515ab12e49
- [bpf,v1,02/10] selftests/bpf: Cover signal tracepoint siginfo sentinels
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/d7719a1736e6
- [bpf,v1,03/10] bpf: Reject tail calls directly from callback frames
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/266aa4ad0b2e
- [bpf,v1,04/10] selftests/bpf: Test direct tail calls from callbacks
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/d9ae3e4c7fb5
- [bpf,v1,05/10] bpf: Reject resilient lock operations in rbtree callbacks
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/7b7b8b596010
- [bpf,v1,06/10] selftests/bpf: Reject resilient unlock in rbtree callback
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/08b4dc83d981
- [bpf,v1,07/10] bpf: Mark sched_process_wait argument as nullable
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/a453d6e3b8e8
- [bpf,v1,08/10] selftests/bpf: Test sched_process_wait nullable argument
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/c1992ba73b03
- [bpf,v1,09/10] bpf: Mark syscall helpers as sleepable
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/d05524794240
- [bpf,v1,10/10] selftests/bpf: Check syscall helpers in timer callbacks
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/26a3a510cd34
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 14:44 [PATCH bpf v1 00/10] Misc bug fixes - part 1 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 14:44 ` [PATCH bpf v1 01/10] bpf: Mark signal tracepoint siginfo arguments as scalar Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 15:52 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 16:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-03 14:44 ` [PATCH bpf v1 02/10] selftests/bpf: Cover signal tracepoint siginfo sentinels Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 15:52 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 14:44 ` [PATCH bpf v1 03/10] bpf: Reject tail calls directly from callback frames Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 15:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 15:36 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 14:44 ` [PATCH bpf v1 04/10] selftests/bpf: Test direct tail calls from callbacks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 14:44 ` [PATCH bpf v1 05/10] bpf: Reject resilient lock operations in rbtree callbacks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 15:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 15:36 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 14:44 ` [PATCH bpf v1 06/10] selftests/bpf: Reject resilient unlock in rbtree callback Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 15:52 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 14:44 ` [PATCH bpf v1 07/10] bpf: Mark sched_process_wait argument as nullable Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 15:52 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 14:44 ` [PATCH bpf v1 08/10] selftests/bpf: Test sched_process_wait nullable argument Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 14:44 ` [PATCH bpf v1 09/10] bpf: Mark syscall helpers as sleepable Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 15:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 15:54 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 15:52 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 14:44 ` [PATCH bpf v1 10/10] selftests/bpf: Check syscall helpers in timer callbacks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 16:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178845422088.3882727.10787208358798363768.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox