Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/4] bpf: Add KF_PERFMON kfunc flag

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Thu, 10 Sep 2026 23:35:07 +0200 you wrote:
> Tracing related BPF helpers e.g. under bpf_base_func_proto() are gated
> behind CAP_PERFMON. However, the same is currently not true for kfuncs
> and they are accessible via plain CAP_BPF. Add a new KF_PERFMON flag
> which can be used such that check_kfunc_call() ensures env->allow_ptr_leaks
> is permitted. This follows similar pattern to existing KF_DESTRUCTIVE flag.
> 
> The rejection returns -EPERM to match the other CAP_PERFMON gates in the
> verifier, that is, check_ptr_to_btf_access() and check_ptr_to_map_access(),
> which report the very same policy to user space.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf,v2,1/4] bpf: Add KF_PERFMON kfunc flag
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/88ce88e933e4
  - [bpf,v2,2/4] bpf: Require CAP_PERFMON for kfuncs reading memory
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/81c975aae375
  - [bpf,v2,3/4] bpf: Require CAP_PERFMON for untrusted read-only memory reads
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/f9191460cd80
  - [bpf,v2,4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for the KF_PERFMON gates
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/a903f145a891

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html