From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A3811FA272; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 17:39:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791308396; cv=none; b=HdwJwkkIULC4ndoZa8xdzL+zhAUvzgVg34xSli9Ql8ta2GzszOu/n3jK/S8RUD8/U6KJ0ZIYHog887APNF/YrbmpB04gmZkYPu3he0hG+QPOksYqRq62IxKQfauG+TUIsqTZEW2Cxgj3icU4cMuYt5L6WGM7VQdxAVwIla2tP1k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791308396; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x8GQ9TqAFu5driuvo38kqzYt3n324pebOlaNmEELI+s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=CKWJV2Y3d/mwFT73TR8E8T/epICAQ1CqpwwMfO6HGJGTZ2JPu+3CHNZ4M59pSFjrSltm1f1b4e10k4RBqMucjrV2zOxSCJ6YBTt+75CBodRRnbHw+WirImROlMIreEwgO31wurwy2M4fIU15jQnBZo3Zl9+7Lon4tP/gJxg+Odo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Fs6ONi0i; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Fs6ONi0i" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C97701F0089B; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 17:39:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791308394; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Fs6ONi0iGUMg1dSot+IBJm/Ni4qjY2Dp14k907srt1r7jHJ9z4cgJGHW8vXqS+K/b DuHC+/4NscMagJ5W2KYkYfz43xQuJlpjoDDbXynUGvKiREBaeM2HjYDknTed6oPVuR Cij6pfi9X7oBfYLzfcNIHuyY09HnpbaoHCtADUd9jN/1A6Mdwce54Ujma6H1dvNFqE jOmkWsuZzcooPMT9nbnBtH+D1ymBIurhT3kN3Du3MD8G+ofJIlWHXWl9plxcitAFuQ 6vQkbeH/qlhgHkrYm9wHJtJi4Kdg6cFY7Ebk2woQwJfCRljOuiYLkIBZ1XU48yYs4l r24yPIqlFXlOw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Tianyi Gao Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, toke@redhat.com, lorenzo@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, hawk@kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] veth: fix peer NETDEV_XDP_ACT_NDO_XMIT after GRO is toggled while down Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 17:39:53 +0000 Message-ID: <179130839329.2231598.14859340679278349582@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261006173241.65945-1-tianyi@cloudflare.com> References: <20261006173241.65945-1-tianyi@cloudflare.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.