From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-179.mta0.migadu.com (out-179.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71DF939F187 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 23:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.179 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776728713; cv=none; b=jKcImQufjS5gepJ14ey+rjRI5uFICuSV8oReTC4XSSihMTXfKlZpo94aFsDu1mhPQxxTQWIpTbQCzLZoHexzGozR4iAfP18Q5B6HiAxY+c+X2ZZbHmeAmwqxe9REd0s8fKRwOdASJDwxtIfzzNizeec0qRNrmHHPbCeJeMk0sj4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776728713; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SFXlExNtsx9rc9zTtORp34qIJUbnwK5l1GPZ6ntRPEs=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=KEmZrGJcR9HHF+Xv2MIb5h3PhJz5SDZ4qRHnLPNCliftEqq9dufwRBX3rZ/Te0a6fT9A/S8dCIMOK/NsLErNMRR6yFH+sEhhHwwsEWeQUYfzL7K7Pbm/osFMsMI1lFNgfeIX19+avNh/DIt9Y1vJiU3LYHssCrfcWH36zXiD1Gs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=FTBKvEf+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.179 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="FTBKvEf+" Message-ID: <19bb22a1-0594-497d-b25c-889b4c5f00a3@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1776728706; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SFXlExNtsx9rc9zTtORp34qIJUbnwK5l1GPZ6ntRPEs=; b=FTBKvEf+ou8hFImKIYNU0PNw9qwRrFncchoVs0hfM2CiCtXvCp69YLIAtivF92Btowclsp 1sb7NPGN9JNHK8RBZbJdQL9xftf8Lu97Un3QFB5aCAe54Ovw4bkPFAWVkdBHQF5bcZZ9sj w+Od/HcF7gtWNSkbCOxhS7xNUwE8kH4= Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 16:44:58 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/17] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs Content-Language: en-GB To: Alexei Starovoitov , Puranjay Mohan Cc: bpf , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , "Jose E . Marchesi" , Kernel Team , Martin KaFai Lau References: <20260419163316.731019-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> <21aad67d-97b8-4ffd-8b4a-747ee8b917be@linux.dev> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Yonghong Song In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 4/20/26 2:49 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 1:25 PM Puranjay Mohan wrote: >> >> Okay, doing it separately is better I guess, I will wait for your >> patches to land and then resend the arm64 support. > Just combine them into one patchset, so that CI tests it all together. Okay, will do.