From: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>, thinker.li@gmail.com
Cc: kuifeng@meta.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
drosen@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v13 14/14] bpf: pass btf object id in bpf_map_info.
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 23:35:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e1325ea-0eec-4d9f-95d9-fb5acd3f533d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df53e635-9ba2-4dac-8aad-4aa491e61f4d@linux.dev>
On 12/14/23 23:46, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 12/8/23 4:27 PM, thinker.li@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
>>
>> Include btf object id (btf_obj_id) in bpf_map_info so that tools (ex:
>> bpftools struct_ops dump) know the correct btf from the kernel to look up
>> type information of struct_ops types.
>>
>> Since struct_ops types can be defined and registered in a module. The
>> type information of a struct_ops type are defined in the btf of the
>> module defining it. The userspace tools need to know which btf is for
>> the module defining a struct_ops type.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
>> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
>> kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 7 +++++++
>> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 ++
>> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
>> 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
>> index c881befa35f5..26103d8a4374 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -3350,5 +3350,6 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops_##_name
>> { \
>> int bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
>> struct btf *btf,
>> struct bpf_verifier_log *log);
>> +void bpf_map_struct_ops_info_fill(struct bpf_map_info *info, struct
>> bpf_map *map);
>
> This needs to be in the CONFIG_BPF_JIT guard also.
Got it!
>
>> #endif /* _LINUX_BPF_H */
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> index 5c3838a97554..716c6b28764d 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -6534,7 +6534,7 @@ struct bpf_map_info {
>> __u32 btf_id;
>> __u32 btf_key_type_id;
>> __u32 btf_value_type_id;
>> - __u32 :32; /* alignment pad */
>> + __u32 btf_obj_id;
>
> may be "btf_vmlinux_id" to make it clear it is a kernel btf and should
> be used with map_info->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id.
Sure!
>
>> __u64 map_extra;
>> } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
>> index fd26716fa0f9..51c0de75aa85 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
>> @@ -979,3 +979,10 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
>> kfree(link);
>> return err;
>> }
>> +
>> +void bpf_map_struct_ops_info_fill(struct bpf_map_info *info, struct
>> bpf_map *map)
>> +{
>> + struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map = (struct bpf_struct_ops_map
>> *)map;
>> +
>> + info->btf_obj_id = btf_obj_id(st_map->btf);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
>> index 4aced7e58904..3cab56cd02ff 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
>> @@ -4715,6 +4715,8 @@ static int bpf_map_get_info_by_fd(struct file
>> *file,
>> info.btf_value_type_id = map->btf_value_type_id;
>> }
>> info.btf_vmlinux_value_type_id = map->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id;
>> + if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS)
>> + bpf_map_struct_ops_info_fill(&info, map);
>
> This patch should be moved earlier in the set instead of after the
> selftest patch 13. May be after patch 5 where st_map->btf is added.
No problem
>
> and where is the test for this?
I use bpf_map_info as a part of calling bpf_map_create() while
testmod.ko is unloaded. It check if this change work as well.
>
>> if (bpf_map_is_offloaded(map)) {
>> err = bpf_map_offload_info_fill(&info, map);
>> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> index 5c3838a97554..716c6b28764d 100644
>> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -6534,7 +6534,7 @@ struct bpf_map_info {
>> __u32 btf_id;
>> __u32 btf_key_type_id;
>> __u32 btf_value_type_id;
>> - __u32 :32; /* alignment pad */
>> + __u32 btf_obj_id;
>> __u64 map_extra;
>> } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-17 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-09 0:26 [PATCH bpf-next v13 00/14] Registrating struct_ops types from modules thinker.li
2023-12-09 0:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 01/14] bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function thinker.li
2023-12-09 0:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 02/14] bpf: get type information with BPF_ID_LIST thinker.li
2023-12-15 1:59 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-09 0:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 03/14] bpf, net: introduce bpf_struct_ops_desc thinker.li
2023-12-15 2:05 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-09 0:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 04/14] bpf: add struct_ops_tab to btf thinker.li
2023-12-15 2:22 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-15 21:42 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-16 1:19 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-16 5:43 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-16 16:48 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-17 7:09 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-09 0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 05/14] bpf: make struct_ops_map support btfs other than btf_vmlinux thinker.li
2023-12-09 0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 06/14] bpf: lookup struct_ops types from a given module BTF thinker.li
2023-12-09 0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 07/14] bpf: pass attached BTF to the bpf_struct_ops subsystem thinker.li
2023-12-15 2:44 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-15 22:10 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-16 0:19 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-16 5:55 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-16 6:07 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-16 16:41 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-16 19:38 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-09 0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 08/14] bpf: hold module for bpf_struct_ops_map thinker.li
2023-12-15 5:54 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-15 23:25 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-09 0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 09/14] bpf: validate value_type thinker.li
2023-12-15 6:02 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-15 23:52 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-09 0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 10/14] bpf, net: switch to dynamic registration thinker.li
2023-12-15 6:51 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-09 0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 11/14] libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs thinker.li
2023-12-09 0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 12/14] bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules thinker.li
2023-12-09 0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 13/14] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops() thinker.li
2023-12-15 7:17 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-17 7:32 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-12-09 0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v13 14/14] bpf: pass btf object id in bpf_map_info thinker.li
2023-12-15 7:46 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-12-17 7:35 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e1325ea-0eec-4d9f-95d9-fb5acd3f533d@gmail.com \
--to=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=drosen@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox