diff for duplicates of <1f8301da4e54$0b0ad690$212083b0$@gmail.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 16500fe..c4c6890 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -60,3 +60,8 @@ Similar question goes for the atomic instructions, i.e., should we
 have separate conformance groups for 32-bit vs 64-bit atomics? 
 
 Dave
+
+-- 
+Bpf mailing list
+Bpf@ietf.org
+https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index f7af0f2..e7d55c5 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
  "ref\0CAADnVQLMo0M675T89gu9v_wSR+GbQmu4ajWjwgWK9aCNkJPsaQ@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "ref\0874jfm68ok.fsf@oracle.com\0"
  "ref\020240123213948.GA221862@maniforge\0"
- "From\0dthaler1968@googlemail.com\0"
- "Subject\0RE: [Bpf] BPF ISA conformance groups\0"
+ "From\0dthaler1968=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [Bpf] BPF ISA conformance groups\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:29:41 -0800\0"
  "To\0'David Vernet' <void@manifault.com>"
  " 'Jose E. Marchesi' <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>\0"
@@ -83,6 +83,11 @@
  "Similar question goes for the atomic instructions, i.e., should we\n"
  "have separate conformance groups for 32-bit vs 64-bit atomics? \n"
  "\n"
- Dave
+ "Dave\n"
+ "\n"
+ "-- \n"
+ "Bpf mailing list\n"
+ "Bpf@ietf.org\n"
+ https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf
 
-84abd2b463680ccc90aa71f23a1d7f0483e1e1ffb42f170b274108c4ede5fe73
+af0da1c51a8fc7938996dfbe385d179b85b9da9c4a35ef80151df1af24ff9a0e
