From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
simon.horman@netronome.com, willemb@google.com,
peterpenkov96@gmail.com, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Subject: [RFC bpf-next v3 1/8] flow_dissector: allow access only to a subset of __sk_buff fields
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:58:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190322195903.162516-2-sdf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190322195903.162516-1-sdf@google.com>
Use whitelist instead of a blacklist and allow only a small set of
fields that might be relevant in the context of flow dissector:
* protocol
* vlan_present
* vlan_tci
* vlan_proto
This is required for the eth_get_headlen case where we have only a
chunk of data to dissect (i.e. trying to read the other skb fields
doesn't make sense).
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
net/core/filter.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 647c63a7b25b..62a7a2f50200 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -6613,14 +6613,8 @@ static bool flow_dissector_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
const struct bpf_prog *prog,
struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
{
- if (type == BPF_WRITE) {
- switch (off) {
- case bpf_ctx_range_till(struct __sk_buff, cb[0], cb[4]):
- break;
- default:
- return false;
- }
- }
+ if (type == BPF_WRITE)
+ return false;
switch (off) {
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, data):
@@ -6632,11 +6626,12 @@ static bool flow_dissector_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
case bpf_ctx_range_ptr(struct __sk_buff, flow_keys):
info->reg_type = PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS;
break;
- case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid):
- case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, data_meta):
- case bpf_ctx_range_till(struct __sk_buff, family, local_port):
- case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, tstamp):
- case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, wire_len):
+ case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, protocol):
+ case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, vlan_present):
+ case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, vlan_tci):
+ case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, vlan_proto):
+ break;
+ default:
return false;
}
--
2.21.0.392.gf8f6787159e-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-22 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 19:58 [RFC bpf-next v3 0/8] net: flow_dissector: trigger BPF hook when called from eth_get_headlen Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-22 19:58 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2019-03-22 19:58 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 2/8] flow_dissector: switch kernel context to struct bpf_flow_dissector Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-22 19:58 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 3/8] flow_dissector: fix clamping of BPF flow_keys for non-zero nhoff Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-22 19:58 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 4/8] bpf: when doing BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN for flow dissector use no-skb mode Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-22 19:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 5/8] net: plumb network namespace into __skb_flow_dissect Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-22 19:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 6/8] flow_dissector: handle no-skb use case Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-23 1:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-03-23 1:19 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-23 1:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-03-23 16:05 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-26 0:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-03-26 16:45 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-26 17:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-03-26 17:51 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-03-26 18:08 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-03-26 18:17 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-26 18:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-03-26 18:54 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-27 1:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-03-27 2:44 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-27 17:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-03-27 19:58 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-28 1:26 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-03-28 3:14 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-03-28 3:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-03-28 4:17 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-28 12:58 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-04-01 16:30 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-22 19:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 7/8] net: pass net argument to the eth_get_headlen Stanislav Fomichev
2019-03-22 19:59 ` [RFC bpf-next v3 8/8] selftests/bpf: add flow dissector bpf_skb_load_bytes helper test Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190322195903.162516-2-sdf@google.com \
--to=sdf@google.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterpenkov96@gmail.com \
--cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).