BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] bpftool: Try to read btf as raw data if elf read fails
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:54:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191024105414.65f7e323@cakuba.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191024132341.8943-1-jolsa@kernel.org>

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:23:41 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> The bpftool interface stays the same, but now it's possible
> to run it over BTF raw data, like:
> 
>   $ bpftool btf dump file /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux
>   [1] INT '(anon)' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=(none)
>   [2] INT 'long unsigned int' size=8 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=64 encoding=(none)
>   [3] CONST '(anon)' type_id=2

My knee jerk reaction would be to implement a new keyword, like:

$ bpftool btf dump rawfile /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux

Or such. But perhaps the auto-detection is the standard way of dealing
with different formats in the compiler world. Regardless if anyone has
an opinion one way or the other please share!!

> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
> v2 changes:
>  - added is_btf_raw to find out which btf__parse_* function to call
>  - changed labels and error propagation in btf__parse_raw 
>  - drop the err initialization, which is not needed under this change

The code looks good, thanks for the changes! One question below..

> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
> index 9a9376d1d3df..a7b8bf233cf5 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c

> +static bool is_btf_raw(const char *file)
> +{
> +	__u16 magic = 0;
> +	int fd;
> +
> +	fd = open(file, O_RDONLY);
> +	if (fd < 0)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	read(fd, &magic, sizeof(magic));
> +	close(fd);
> +	return magic == BTF_MAGIC;

Isn't it suspicious to read() 2 bytes into an u16 and compare to a
constant like endianness doesn't matter? Quick grep doesn't reveal
BTF_MAGIC being endian-aware..

> +}
> +
>  static int do_dump(int argc, char **argv)
>  {
>  	struct btf *btf = NULL;
> @@ -465,7 +516,11 @@ static int do_dump(int argc, char **argv)
>  		}
>  		NEXT_ARG();
>  	} else if (is_prefix(src, "file")) {
> -		btf = btf__parse_elf(*argv, NULL);
> +		if (is_btf_raw(*argv))
> +			btf = btf__parse_raw(*argv);
> +		else
> +			btf = btf__parse_elf(*argv, NULL);
>  		if (IS_ERR(btf)) {
>  			err = PTR_ERR(btf);
>  			btf = NULL;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-24 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-24 13:23 [PATCHv2] bpftool: Try to read btf as raw data if elf read fails Jiri Olsa
2019-10-24 13:31 ` Jiri Olsa
2019-10-24 17:54 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-10-25  5:01   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-25 16:31     ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-10-25 16:32       ` Jiri Olsa
2019-10-25 16:53       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-25 17:32         ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191024105414.65f7e323@cakuba.hsd1.ca.comcast.net \
    --to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox