From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: support doubleword alignment in bpf_jit_binary_alloc
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:37:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191115123722.58462-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Currently passing alignment greater than 4 to bpf_jit_binary_alloc does
not work: in such cases it silently aligns only to 4 bytes.
On s390, in order to load a constant from memory in a large (>512k) BPF
program, one must use lgrl instruction, whose memory operand must be
aligned on an 8-byte boundary.
This patch makes it possible to request 8-byte alignment from
bpf_jit_binary_alloc, and also makes it issue a warning when an
unsupported alignment is requested.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
v1 -> v2: Simply bump alignment to 8, don't try to be too generic.
include/linux/filter.h | 6 ++++--
kernel/bpf/core.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 7a6f8f6f1da4..ad80e9c6111c 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -515,10 +515,12 @@ struct sock_fprog_kern {
struct sock_filter *filter;
};
+/* Some arches need doubleword alignment for their instructions and/or data */
+#define BPF_IMAGE_ALIGNMENT 8
+
struct bpf_binary_header {
u32 pages;
- /* Some arches need word alignment for their instructions */
- u8 image[] __aligned(4);
+ u8 image[] __aligned(BPF_IMAGE_ALIGNMENT);
};
struct bpf_prog {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index c1fde0303280..99693f3c4e99 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
#include <linux/extable.h>
+#include <linux/log2.h>
#include <asm/unaligned.h>
/* Registers */
@@ -815,6 +816,9 @@ bpf_jit_binary_alloc(unsigned int proglen, u8 **image_ptr,
struct bpf_binary_header *hdr;
u32 size, hole, start, pages;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_power_of_2(alignment) ||
+ alignment > BPF_IMAGE_ALIGNMENT);
+
/* Most of BPF filters are really small, but if some of them
* fill a page, allow at least 128 extra bytes to insert a
* random section of illegal instructions.
--
2.23.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-11-15 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-15 12:37 Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2019-11-15 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: support doubleword alignment in bpf_jit_binary_alloc Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191115123722.58462-1-iii@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox