BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 081/350] libbpf: Fix passing uninitialized bytes to setsockopt
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:03:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210210735.9077-42-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210210735.9077-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>

[ Upstream commit 25bfef430e960e695403b5d9c8dcc11b9f5d62be ]

'struct xdp_umem_reg' has 4 bytes of padding at the end that makes
valgrind complain about passing uninitialized stack memory to the
syscall:

  Syscall param socketcall.setsockopt() points to uninitialised byte(s)
    at 0x4E7AB7E: setsockopt (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.29.so)
    by 0x4BDE035: xsk_umem__create@@LIBBPF_0.0.4 (xsk.c:172)
  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
    at 0x4BDDEBA: xsk_umem__create@@LIBBPF_0.0.4 (xsk.c:140)

Padding bytes appeared after introducing of a new 'flags' field.
memset() is required to clear them.

Fixes: 10d30e301732 ("libbpf: add flags to umem config")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191009164929.17242-1-i.maximets@ovn.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
index a902838f9fccd..9d53480862030 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
@@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ int xsk_umem__create_v0_0_4(struct xsk_umem **umem_ptr, void *umem_area,
 	umem->umem_area = umem_area;
 	xsk_set_umem_config(&umem->config, usr_config);
 
+	memset(&mr, 0, sizeof(mr));
 	mr.addr = (uintptr_t)umem_area;
 	mr.len = size;
 	mr.chunk_size = umem->config.frame_size;
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-10 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20191210210735.9077-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-12-10 21:02 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 056/350] selftests/bpf: Correct path to include msg + path Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:03 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 079/350] selftests/bpf: Fix btf_dump padding test case Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:03 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 080/350] libbpf: Fix struct end padding in btf_dump Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:03 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2019-12-10 21:03 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 123/350] bpf/stackmap: Fix deadlock with rq_lock in bpf_get_stack() Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:03 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 132/350] selftests/bpf: Make a copy of subtest name Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:04 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 193/350] libbpf: Fix error handling in bpf_map__reuse_fd() Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 229/350] perf tools: Splice events onto evlist even on error Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 235/350] perf parse: If pmu configuration fails free terms Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 242/350] libbpf: Fix negative FD close() in xsk_setup_xdp_prog() Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:05 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 243/350] s390/bpf: Use kvcalloc for addrs array Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:06 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 267/350] bpf, testing: Workaround a verifier failure for test_progs Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:06 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 306/350] selftests, bpf: Fix test_tc_tunnel hanging Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:06 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 307/350] selftests, bpf: Workaround an alu32 sub-register spilling issue Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:06 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 313/350] net-af_xdp: Use correct number of channels from ethtool Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 326/350] bpf: Switch bpf_map ref counter to atomic64_t so bpf_map_inc() never fails Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:28   ` [oss-drivers] " Jakub Kicinski
2019-12-12 16:25     ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-12-19 23:25       ` Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 327/350] libbpf: Fix call relocation offset calculation bug Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 343/350] tools, bpf: Fix build for 'make -s tools/bpf O=<dir>' Sasha Levin
2019-12-10 21:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 346/350] bpf: Provide better register bounds after jmp32 instructions Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191210210735.9077-42-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox