From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4242EC433DF for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 08:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164BB2088E for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 08:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="hn6BPRIM" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726350AbgE1IGK (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 04:06:10 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:52003 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726330AbgE1IGK (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 04:06:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1590653169; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/A7U1eX3P3zNwvhg2WSo20I7YadGS8TVdB6GLHa5NLI=; b=hn6BPRIM7aZLeaGShLY2potEj4ZXB2VvrLzgwpS96rw+ynB9BN13qQBuSV0TDBgHU5UXFw 4ZfJTterAhEoVDQ6WUoQ3NZv3vx3CBUPvQ4gcDhoIgfk5crR/B7sP7QVin/stXEIGAjkiG cmvrs4vOFzSfwHoY/wm4rA01vPukn2Y= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-100-B_reQBTVMvavJnFNHpyU-w-1; Thu, 28 May 2020 04:06:05 -0400 X-MC-Unique: B_reQBTVMvavJnFNHpyU-w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFCBD800D24; Thu, 28 May 2020 08:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.40.195.14]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 521C819D82; Thu, 28 May 2020 08:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 10:05:57 +0200 From: Jiri Benc To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: shuah , Yauheni Kaliuta , Andrii Nakryiko , bpf , Jiri Olsa , Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: split -extras target to -static and -gen Message-ID: <20200528100557.20489f04@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200522081901.238516-1-yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 27 May 2020 15:23:13 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > I prefer to keep selftests/bpf install broken. > This forced marriage between kselftests and selftests/bpf > never worked well. I think it's a time to free them up from each other. Alexei, it would be great if you could cooperate with other people instead of pushing your own way. The selftests infrastructure was put to the kernel to have one place for testing. Inventing yet another way to add tests does not help anyone. You don't own the kernel. We're community, we should cooperate. Jiri