BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] s390/bpf: fix sign extension in branch_ku
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:23:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200717222334.GQ3644@ubuntu-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200717165326.6786-3-iii@linux.ibm.com>

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 06:53:23PM +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> Both signed and unsigned variants of BPF_JMP | BPF_K require
> sign-extending the immediate. JIT emits cgfi for the signed case,
> which is correct, and clgfi for the unsigned case, which is not
> correct: clgfi zero-extends the immediate.
> 
> s390 does not provide an instruction that does sign-extension and
> unsigned comparison at the same time. Therefore, fix by first loading
> the sign-extended immediate into work register REG_1 and proceeding
> as if it's BPF_X.
> 
> Fixes: 4e9b4a6883dd ("s390/bpf: Use relative long branches")
> Reported-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>

This fixes the failing tests I was seeing. Thanks!

Tested-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-17 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-17 16:53 [PATCH 0/5] s390/bpf: fix lib/test_bpf.c failures Ilya Leoshkevich
2020-07-17 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] selftests: bpf: test_kmod.sh: fix running out of srctree Ilya Leoshkevich
2020-07-17 16:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] s390/bpf: fix sign extension in branch_ku Ilya Leoshkevich
2020-07-17 22:23   ` Seth Forshee [this message]
2020-07-17 16:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] s390/bpf: use brcl for jumping to exit_ip if necessary Ilya Leoshkevich
2020-07-17 16:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] s390/bpf: tolerate not converging code shrinking Ilya Leoshkevich
2020-07-17 16:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] s390/bpf: use bpf_skip() in bpf_jit_prologue() Ilya Leoshkevich
2020-07-21 18:17 ` [PATCH 0/5] s390/bpf: fix lib/test_bpf.c failures Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200717222334.GQ3644@ubuntu-x1 \
    --to=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox