BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
	"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 6/7] bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:44:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917224436.GA11842@ranger.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4Bza908+c__590SK+_39fUuk51+O2oQnLzGNZ8jyjib5yzw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:03:32PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 3:54 PM Maciej Fijalkowski
> <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Relax verifier's restriction that was meant to forbid tailcall usage
> > when subprog count was higher than 1.
> >
> > Also, do not max out the stack depth of program that utilizes tailcalls.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> > ---
> 
> Maciej,
> 
> Only patches 6 and 7 arrived (a while ago) and seems like the other
> patches are lost and not going to come. Do you mind resending entire
> patch set?

Sure. Vger lately has been giving me a hard time, thought that maybe rest
of set would eventually arrive, similarly to what Toke experienced I
guess.

> 
> [...]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-17 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200916211010.3685-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
2020-09-16 21:10 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 6/7] bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-09-17 21:03   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-17 22:44     ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2020-09-17 22:52       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-09-16 21:10 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 7/7] selftests: bpf: introduce tailcall_bpf2bpf test suite Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-09-18  3:26 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 0/7] bpf: tailcalls in BPF subprograms Alexei Starovoitov
2020-09-21 16:05   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-09-23 16:11   ` Lorenz Bauer
2020-09-23 16:24     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-23 16:43       ` Lorenz Bauer
2020-09-23 16:55         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-23 18:41     ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200917224436.GA11842@ranger.igk.intel.com \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox