From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, shuah@kernel.org,
kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, andriin@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@chromium.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix alignment of .BTF_ids
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:52:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200930115217.GA3839577@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200930093559.2120126-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:36:01AM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Fix a build failure on arm64, due to missing alignment information for
> the .BTF_ids section:
>
> resolve_btfids.test.o: in function `test_resolve_btfids':
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c:140:(.text+0x29c): relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_LDST32_ABS_LO12_NC against `.BTF_ids'
> ld: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c:140: warning: one possible cause of this error is that the symbol is being referenced in the indicated code as if it had a larger alignment than was declared where it was defined
>
> In vmlinux, the .BTF_ids section is aligned to 4 bytes by vmlinux.lds.h.
> In test_progs however, .BTF_ids doesn't have alignment constraints. The
> arm64 linker expects the btf_id_set.cnt symbol, a u32, to be naturally
> aligned but finds it misaligned and cannot apply the relocation. Enforce
> alignment of .BTF_ids to 4 bytes.
>
> Fixes: cd04b04de119 ("selftests/bpf: Add set test to resolve_btfids")
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c
> index 8826c652adad..6ace5e9efec1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ struct symbol test_symbols[] = {
> { "func", BTF_KIND_FUNC, -1 },
> };
>
> +/* Align the .BTF_ids section to 4 bytes */
> +asm (
> +".pushsection " BTF_IDS_SECTION " ,\"a\"; \n"
> +".balign 4, 0; \n"
> +".popsection; \n");
> +
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
thanks,
jirka
> BTF_ID_LIST(test_list_local)
> BTF_ID_UNUSED
> BTF_ID(typedef, S)
> --
> 2.28.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-30 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-30 9:36 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix alignment of .BTF_ids Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-09-30 11:52 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-10-01 1:30 ` patchwork-bot+bpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200930115217.GA3839577@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox