From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
kuba@kernel.org, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: xdp: introduce bulking for xdp tx return path
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:43:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201028114301.GC5386@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201028123419.27e1ac54@carbon>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4495 bytes --]
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 20:04:07 +0100
> Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Introduce bulking capability in xdp tx return path (XDP_REDIRECT).
> > xdp_return_frame is usually run inside the driver NAPI tx completion
> > loop so it is possible batch it.
> > Current implementation considers only page_pool memory model.
> > Convert mvneta driver to xdp_return_frame_bulk APIs.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Hi Jesper,
thx for the review.
>
> I think you/we have to explain better in this commit message, what the
> idea/concept behind this bulk return is. Or even explain this as a
> comment above "xdp_return_frame_bulk".
>
> Maybe add/append text to commit below:
>
> The bulk API introduced is a defer and flush API, that will defer
> the return if the xdp_mem_allocator object is the same, identified
> via the mem.id field (xdp_mem_info). Thus, the flush operation will
> operate on the same xdp_mem_allocator object.
>
> The bulk queue size of 16 is no coincident. This is connected to how
> XDP redirect will bulk xmit (upto 16) frames. Thus, the idea is for the
> API to find these boundaries (via mem.id match), which is optimal for
> both the I-cache and D-cache for the memory allocator code and object.
>
> The data structure (xdp_frame_bulk) used for deferred elements is
> stored/allocated on the function call-stack, which allows lockfree
> access.
ack, I will add it in v2
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> > ---
> [...]
> > diff --git a/include/net/xdp.h b/include/net/xdp.h
> > index 3814fb631d52..9567110845ef 100644
> > --- a/include/net/xdp.h
> > +++ b/include/net/xdp.h
> > @@ -104,6 +104,12 @@ struct xdp_frame {
> > struct net_device *dev_rx; /* used by cpumap */
> > };
> >
> > +#define XDP_BULK_QUEUE_SIZE 16
>
> Maybe "#define DEV_MAP_BULK_SIZE 16" should be def to
> XDP_BULK_QUEUE_SIZE, to express the described connection.
ack, I guess we can fix it in a following patch
>
> > +struct xdp_frame_bulk {
> > + void *q[XDP_BULK_QUEUE_SIZE];
> > + int count;
> > + void *xa;
>
> Just a hunch (not benchmarked), but I think it will be more optimal to
> place 'count' and '*xa' above the '*q' array. (It might not matter at
> all, as we cannot control the start alignment, when this is on the
> stack.)
ack. I will fix in v2.
>
> > +};
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/net/core/xdp.c b/net/core/xdp.c
> > index 48aba933a5a8..93eabd789246 100644
> > --- a/net/core/xdp.c
> > +++ b/net/core/xdp.c
> > @@ -380,6 +380,57 @@ void xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(struct xdp_frame *xdpf)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xdp_return_frame_rx_napi);
> >
> > +void xdp_flush_frame_bulk(struct xdp_frame_bulk *bq)
> > +{
> > + struct xdp_mem_allocator *xa = bq->xa;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!xa))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < bq->count; i++) {
> > + struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(bq->q[i]);
> > +
> > + page_pool_put_full_page(xa->page_pool, page, false);
> > + }
> > + bq->count = 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xdp_flush_frame_bulk);
> > +
>
> Wondering if we should have a comment that explains the intent and idea
> behind this function?
>
> /* Defers return when frame belongs to same mem.id as previous frame */
>
ack.
Regards,
Lorenzo
> > +void xdp_return_frame_bulk(struct xdp_frame *xdpf,
> > + struct xdp_frame_bulk *bq)
> > +{
> > + struct xdp_mem_info *mem = &xdpf->mem;
> > + struct xdp_mem_allocator *xa, *nxa;
> > +
> > + if (mem->type != MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL) {
> > + __xdp_return(xdpf->data, &xdpf->mem, false);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > +
> > + xa = bq->xa;
> > + if (unlikely(!xa || mem->id != xa->mem.id)) {
> > + nxa = rhashtable_lookup(mem_id_ht, &mem->id, mem_id_rht_params);
> > + if (unlikely(!xa)) {
> > + bq->count = 0;
> > + bq->xa = nxa;
> > + xa = nxa;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (mem->id != xa->mem.id || bq->count == XDP_BULK_QUEUE_SIZE)
> > + xdp_flush_frame_bulk(bq);
> > +
> > + bq->q[bq->count++] = xdpf->data;
> > + if (mem->id != xa->mem.id)
> > + bq->xa = nxa;
> > +
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xdp_return_frame_bulk);
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-28 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-27 19:04 [PATCH net-next 0/4] xdp: introduce bulking for page_pool tx return path Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-10-27 19:04 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: xdp: introduce bulking for xdp " Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-10-28 9:27 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2020-10-28 10:23 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-10-28 10:59 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2020-10-28 11:28 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-10-28 11:34 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-28 11:43 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2020-10-29 13:52 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-29 14:02 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-10-29 14:08 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2020-10-27 19:04 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: page_pool: add bulk support for ptr_ring Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-10-29 7:08 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2020-10-29 10:36 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-10-29 7:25 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2020-10-29 10:37 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-10-29 10:13 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-29 10:31 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-10-29 13:40 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-27 19:04 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: mvpp2: add xdp tx return bulking support Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-10-27 19:04 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: mlx5: " Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-10-29 11:42 ` Shay Agroskin
2020-10-29 13:15 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201028114301.GC5386@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).