From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
dwarves@vger.kernel.org, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] btf_encoder: Change functions check due to broken dwarf
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 00:22:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201103232223.GB3861143@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzYeaiQJ+-NCtCK4wB-2ia3U40RtTWez6c7osCuzpy11Zg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:55:58AM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
SNIP
> > I can still see several differences to ftrace functions in
> > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/available_filter_functions file:
> >
> > - available_filter_functions includes modules (7086 functions)
> > - available_filter_functions includes functions like:
> > __acpi_match_device.part.0.constprop.0
> > acpi_ns_check_sorted_list.constprop.0
> > acpi_os_unmap_generic_address.part.0
> > acpiphp_check_bridge.part.0
> >
> > which are not part of dwarf data (1164 functions)
> > - BTF includes multiple functions like:
> > __clk_register_clkdev
> > clk_register_clkdev
> >
> > which share same code so they appear just as single function
> > in available_filter_functions, but dwarf keeps track of both
> > of them (16 functions)
> >
> > With this change I'm getting 38334 BTF functions, which
> > when added above functions to consideration gives same
> > amount of functions in available_filter_functions.
> >
> > The patch still keeps the original function filter condition
> > (that uses current fn->declaration check) in case the object
> > does not contain *_mcount_loc symbol -> object is not vmlinux.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > btf_encoder.c | 222 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 220 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> [...]
>
> > +static int collect_function(struct btf_elf *btfe, GElf_Sym *sym)
> > +{
> > + if (elf_sym__type(sym) != STT_FUNC)
> > + return 0;
> > + if (!elf_sym__value(sym))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (functions_cnt == functions_alloc) {
> > + functions_alloc = max(1000, functions_alloc * 3 / 2);
> > + functions = realloc(functions, functions_alloc * sizeof(*functions));
> > + if (!functions)
> > + return -1;
ok, I thought that if we go down I don't need to,
but I did not check how pahole is handling this,
probably free everything
>
> memory leak right here. You need to use a temporary variable and check
> if for NULL, before overwriting functions.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + functions[functions_cnt].name = elf_sym__name(sym, btfe->symtab);
> > + functions[functions_cnt].addr = elf_sym__value(sym);
> > + functions[functions_cnt].generated = false;
> > + functions[functions_cnt].valid = false;
> > + functions_cnt++;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int addrs_cmp(const void *_a, const void *_b)
> > +{
> > + const unsigned long *a = _a;
> > + const unsigned long *b = _b;
> > +
> > + return *a - *b;
>
> this is cute, but is it always correct? instead of thinking how this
> works with overflows, maybe let's keep it simple with
>
> if (*a == *b)
> return 0;
> return *a < *b ? -1 : 1;
sure, will fix
>
> ?
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int filter_functions(struct btf_elf *btfe, struct mcount_symbols *ms)
> > +{
> > + bool init_filter = ms->init_begin && ms->init_end;
> > + unsigned long *addrs, count, offset, i;
> > + Elf_Data *data;
> > + GElf_Shdr shdr;
> > + Elf_Scn *sec;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Find mcount addressed marked by __start_mcount_loc
> > + * and __stop_mcount_loc symbols and load them into
> > + * sorted array.
> > + */
> > + sec = elf_getscn(btfe->elf, ms->start_section);
> > + if (!sec || !gelf_getshdr(sec, &shdr)) {
> > + fprintf(stderr, "Failed to get section(%lu) header.\n",
> > + ms->start_section);
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + offset = ms->start - shdr.sh_addr;
> > + count = (ms->stop - ms->start) / 8;
> > +
> > + data = elf_getdata(sec, 0);
> > + if (!data) {
> > + fprintf(stderr, "Failed to section(%lu) data.\n",
>
> typo: failed to get?
yep
>
> > + ms->start_section);
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + addrs = malloc(count * sizeof(addrs[0]));
> > + if (!addrs) {
> > + fprintf(stderr, "Failed to allocate memory for ftrace addresses.\n");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > +#define SET_SYMBOL(__sym, __var) \
> > + if (!ms->__var && !strcmp(__sym, elf_sym__name(sym, btfe->symtab))) \
> > + ms->__var = sym->st_value; \
> > +
> > +static void collect_mcount_symbol(GElf_Sym *sym, struct mcount_symbols *ms)
> > +{
> > + if (!ms->start &&
> > + !strcmp("__start_mcount_loc", elf_sym__name(sym, btfe->symtab))) {
> > + ms->start = sym->st_value;
> > + ms->start_section = sym->st_shndx;
> > + }
> > + SET_SYMBOL("__stop_mcount_loc", stop)
> > + SET_SYMBOL("__init_begin", init_begin)
> > + SET_SYMBOL("__init_end", init_end)
>
> please don't use macro here, it doesn't save much code but complicates
> reading it quite significantly
ok
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +#undef SET_SYMBOL
> > +
> > static int collect_symbols(struct btf_elf *btfe, bool collect_percpu_vars)
> > {
> > + struct mcount_symbols ms = { };
> > uint32_t core_id;
> > GElf_Sym sym;
> >
> > @@ -320,6 +485,9 @@ static int collect_symbols(struct btf_elf *btfe, bool collect_percpu_vars)
> > elf_symtab__for_each_symbol(btfe->symtab, core_id, sym) {
> > if (collect_percpu_vars && collect_percpu_var(btfe, &sym))
> > return -1;
> > + if (collect_function(btfe, &sym))
> > + return -1;
> > + collect_mcount_symbol(&sym, &ms);
> > }
> >
> > if (collect_percpu_vars) {
> > @@ -329,9 +497,34 @@ static int collect_symbols(struct btf_elf *btfe, bool collect_percpu_vars)
> > if (btf_elf__verbose)
> > printf("Found %d per-CPU variables!\n", percpu_var_cnt);
> > }
> > +
> > + if (functions_cnt) {
> > + qsort(functions, functions_cnt, sizeof(functions[0]), functions_cmp);
> > + if (ms.start && ms.stop &&
> > + filter_functions(btfe, &ms)) {
>
> nit: single line should fit well, no?
ook
thanks,
jirka
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-03 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-31 22:31 [PATCHv2 0/2] pahole: Workaround dwarf bug for function encoding Jiri Olsa
2020-10-31 22:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] btf_encoder: Move find_all_percpu_vars in generic collect_symbols Jiri Olsa
2020-11-02 18:29 ` Hao Luo
2020-11-03 17:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-10-31 22:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] btf_encoder: Change functions check due to broken dwarf Jiri Olsa
2020-11-02 21:59 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-11-02 22:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-11-03 18:58 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-11-03 19:05 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-11-03 19:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-11-03 19:34 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-11-03 20:27 ` Yonghong Song
2020-11-03 23:18 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-11-03 18:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-11-03 23:22 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201103232223.GB3861143@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwarves@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=mjw@redhat.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox