BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	dwarves@vger.kernel.org, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] btf_encoder: Fix function generation
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 22:29:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201113212907.GD842058@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4Bzb4yu4K+fk33n0Tas78XsKMFw+tofF2o5sOwumBC82u9Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:56:40PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 7:13 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Current conditions for picking up function records break
> > BTF data on some gcc versions.
> >
> > Some function records can appear with no arguments but with
> > declaration tag set, so moving the 'fn->declaration' in front
> > of other checks.
> >
> > Then checking if argument names are present and finally checking
> > ftrace filter if it's present. If ftrace filter is not available,
> > using the external tag to filter out non external functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> 
> I tested locally, all seems to work fine. Left few suggestions below,
> but those could be done in follow ups (or argued to not be done).
> 
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> 
> BTW, for some stats.
> 
> BEFORE allowing static funcs:
> 
> .BTF ELF section
> =======================================
> Data size:      4101624
> Header size:    24
> Types size:     2472836
> Strings size:   1628764
> 
> BTF types
> =======================================
> Total        2472836 bytes (83310 types)
> Struct:       920436 bytes (10305 types)
> FuncProto:    638668 bytes (18869 types)
> Func:         308304 bytes (25692 types)
> Enum:         184308 bytes (2293 types)
> Ptr:          173484 bytes (14457 types)
> Array:         89064 bytes (3711 types)
> Union:         81552 bytes (1961 types)
> Const:         34368 bytes (2864 types)
> Typedef:       32124 bytes (2677 types)
> Var:            4688 bytes (293 types)
> Datasec:        3528 bytes (1 types)
> Fwd:            1656 bytes (138 types)
> Volatile:        360 bytes (30 types)
> Int:             272 bytes (17 types)
> Restrict:         24 bytes (2 types)
> 
> 
> AFTER allowing static funcs:
> 
> .BTF ELF section
> =======================================
> Data size:      4930558
> Header size:    24
> Types size:     2914016
> Strings size:   2016518
> 
> BTF types
> =======================================
> Total        2914016 bytes (108282 types)
> Struct:       920436 bytes (10305 types)
> FuncProto:    851528 bytes (24814 types)
> Func:         536664 bytes (44722 types)
> Enum:         184308 bytes (2293 types)
> Ptr:          173484 bytes (14457 types)
> Array:         89064 bytes (3711 types)
> Union:         81552 bytes (1961 types)
> Const:         34368 bytes (2864 types)
> Typedef:       32124 bytes (2677 types)
> Var:            4688 bytes (293 types)
> Datasec:        3528 bytes (1 types)
> Fwd:            1656 bytes (138 types)
> Volatile:        360 bytes (30 types)
> Int:             256 bytes (16 types)

nice, is this tool somewhere in the tree?

> 
> So 25692 vs 44722 functions, but the increase in func_proto is smaller
> due to dedup. Good chunk is strings data for all those function and
> parameter names.
> 
> 
> >  btf_encoder.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/btf_encoder.c b/btf_encoder.c
> > index d531651b1e9e..de471bc754b1 100644
> > --- a/btf_encoder.c
> > +++ b/btf_encoder.c
> > @@ -612,25 +612,21 @@ int cu__encode_btf(struct cu *cu, int verbose, bool force,
> >                 const char *name;
> >
> >                 /*
> > -                * The functions_cnt != 0 means we parsed all necessary
> > -                * kernel symbols and we are using ftrace location filter
> > -                * for functions. If it's not available keep the current
> > -                * dwarf declaration check.
> > +                * Skip functions that:
> > +                *   - are marked as declarations
> > +                *   - do not have full argument names
> > +                *   - are not in ftrace list (if it's available)
> > +                *   - are not external (in case ftrace filter is not available)
> >                  */
> > +               if (fn->declaration)
> > +                       continue;
> > +               if (!has_arg_names(cu, &fn->proto))
> > +                       continue;
> >                 if (functions_cnt) {
> > -                       /*
> > -                        * We check following conditions:
> > -                        *   - argument names are defined
> > -                        *   - there's symbol and address defined for the function
> > -                        *   - function address belongs to ftrace locations
> > -                        *   - function is generated only once
> > -                        */
> > -                       if (!has_arg_names(cu, &fn->proto))
> > -                               continue;
> >                         if (!should_generate_function(btfe, function__name(fn, cu)))
> 
> Seeing Arnaldo's confusion, I remember initially I was similarly
> confused. I think this p->generated = true should be moved out of
> should_generate_function() and done here explicitly. Let's turn
> should_generate_function() into find_allowed_function() or something,
> to encapsulate bsearch. Checking !p || p->generated could be done here
> explicitly.

ok, that should be more obvious, I'll send new version

> 
> >                                 continue;
> >                 } else {
> > -                       if (fn->declaration || !fn->external)
> > +                       if (!fn->external)
> 
> Hm.. why didn't you drop this fallback? For non-vmlinux, do you think
> it's a problem to generate all FUNCs? Mostly theoretical question,
> though.

because it would probably allowed all static functions,
(ftrace data has only static functions that are traceable)
and who knows what a can of worms we'd open here ;-)

jirka


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-13 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-13 15:12 [PATCHv2 0/2] btf_encoder: Fix functions BTF data generation Jiri Olsa
2020-11-13 15:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] btf_encoder: Generate also .init functions Jiri Olsa
2020-11-13 15:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] btf_encoder: Fix function generation Jiri Olsa
2020-11-13 17:28   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-11-13 18:11     ` Jiri Olsa
2020-11-13 20:56   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-11-13 21:29     ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-11-13 21:43       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-11-16 13:50         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-11-16 18:21           ` Jiri Olsa
2020-11-16 19:15             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-11-16 19:22               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-11-16 19:40                 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-11-16 19:44                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-11-14 22:38 [PATCHv3 0/2] btf_encoder: Fix functions BTF data generation Jiri Olsa
2020-11-14 22:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] btf_encoder: Fix function generation Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201113212907.GD842058@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dwarves@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox