BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Fix the irq and nmi check in bpf_sk_storage for tracing usage
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:01:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201116200113.2868539-1-kafai@fb.com> (raw)

The intention of the current check is to avoid using bpf_sk_storage
in irq and nmi.  Jakub pointed out that the current check cannot
do that.  For example, in_serving_softirq() returns true
if the softirq handling is interrupted by hard irq.

Fixes: 8e4597c627fb ("bpf: Allow using bpf_sk_storage in FENTRY/FEXIT/RAW_TP")
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
---
 net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
index 359908a7d3c1..a32037daa933 100644
--- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
+++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static bool bpf_sk_storage_tracing_allowed(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing, struct bpf_map *, map, struct sock *, sk,
 	   void *, value, u64, flags)
 {
-	if (!in_serving_softirq() && !in_task())
+	if (in_irq() || in_nmi())
 		return (unsigned long)NULL;
 
 	return (unsigned long)____bpf_sk_storage_get(map, sk, value, flags);
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing, struct bpf_map *, map, struct sock *, sk,
 BPF_CALL_2(bpf_sk_storage_delete_tracing, struct bpf_map *, map,
 	   struct sock *, sk)
 {
-	if (!in_serving_softirq() && !in_task())
+	if (in_irq() || in_nmi())
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	return ____bpf_sk_storage_delete(map, sk);
-- 
2.24.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-11-16 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-16 20:01 Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2020-11-17  1:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Fix the irq and nmi check in bpf_sk_storage for tracing usage patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201116200113.2868539-1-kafai@fb.com \
    --to=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox