From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/11] bpf: refactor check_func_call() to allow callback function
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:33:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210225073312.4120415-1-yhs@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210225073309.4119708-1-yhs@fb.com>
Later proposed bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper has callback
function as one of its arguments. This patch refactored
check_func_call() to permit callback function which sets
callee state. Different callback functions may have
different callee states.
There is no functionality change for this patch except
it added a case to handle where subprog number is known
and there is no need to do find_subprog(). This case
is used later by implementing bpf_for_each_map() helper.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index a657860ecba5..092d2c734dd8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5250,13 +5250,19 @@ static void clear_caller_saved_regs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
}
}
-static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
- int *insn_idx)
+typedef int (*set_callee_state_fn)(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ struct bpf_func_state *caller,
+ struct bpf_func_state *callee,
+ int insn_idx);
+
+static int __check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
+ int *insn_idx, int subprog,
+ set_callee_state_fn set_callee_st)
{
struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state;
struct bpf_func_info_aux *func_info_aux;
struct bpf_func_state *caller, *callee;
- int i, err, subprog, target_insn;
+ int err, target_insn;
bool is_global = false;
if (state->curframe + 1 >= MAX_CALL_FRAMES) {
@@ -5265,12 +5271,16 @@ static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
return -E2BIG;
}
- target_insn = *insn_idx + insn->imm;
- subprog = find_subprog(env, target_insn + 1);
if (subprog < 0) {
- verbose(env, "verifier bug. No program starts at insn %d\n",
- target_insn + 1);
- return -EFAULT;
+ target_insn = *insn_idx + insn->imm;
+ subprog = find_subprog(env, target_insn + 1);
+ if (subprog < 0) {
+ verbose(env, "verifier bug. No program starts at insn %d\n",
+ target_insn + 1);
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+ } else {
+ target_insn = env->subprog_info[subprog].start - 1;
}
caller = state->frame[state->curframe];
@@ -5327,11 +5337,9 @@ static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
if (err)
return err;
- /* copy r1 - r5 args that callee can access. The copy includes parent
- * pointers, which connects us up to the liveness chain
- */
- for (i = BPF_REG_1; i <= BPF_REG_5; i++)
- callee->regs[i] = caller->regs[i];
+ err = set_callee_st(env, caller, callee, *insn_idx);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
clear_caller_saved_regs(env, caller->regs);
@@ -5350,6 +5358,26 @@ static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
return 0;
}
+static int set_callee_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ struct bpf_func_state *caller,
+ struct bpf_func_state *callee, int insn_idx)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ /* copy r1 - r5 args that callee can access. The copy includes parent
+ * pointers, which connects us up to the liveness chain
+ */
+ for (i = BPF_REG_1; i <= BPF_REG_5; i++)
+ callee->regs[i] = caller->regs[i];
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
+ int *insn_idx)
+{
+ return __check_func_call(env, insn, insn_idx, -1, set_callee_state);
+}
+
static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
{
struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state;
--
2.24.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-25 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-25 7:33 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/11] bpf: add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/11] bpf: factor out visit_func_call_insn() in check_cfg() Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 21:54 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25 22:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-02-25 7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/11] bpf: factor out verbose_invalid_scalar() Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 21:56 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25 7:33 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2021-02-25 22:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/11] bpf: refactor check_func_call() to allow callback function Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25 22:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-26 0:08 ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 1:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-26 0:05 ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/11] bpf: add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 22:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-26 2:16 ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 3:22 ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 2:27 ` Cong Wang
2021-02-26 3:27 ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/11] bpf: add hashtab support for " Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 22:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25 7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/11] bpf: add arraymap " Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 22:48 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25 7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/11] libbpf: move function is_ldimm64() earlier in libbpf.c Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/11] libbpf: support subprog address relocation Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 23:04 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25 7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/11] bpftool: print subprog address properly Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 23:04 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25 7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/11] selftests/bpf: add hashmap test for bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 23:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-26 3:24 ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/11] selftests/bpf: add arraymap " Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 23:26 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210225073312.4120415-1-yhs@fb.com \
--to=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox