BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/11] bpf: refactor check_func_call() to allow callback function
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:33:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210225073312.4120415-1-yhs@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210225073309.4119708-1-yhs@fb.com>

Later proposed bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper has callback
function as one of its arguments. This patch refactored
check_func_call() to permit callback function which sets
callee state. Different callback functions may have
different callee states.

There is no functionality change for this patch except
it added a case to handle where subprog number is known
and there is no need to do find_subprog(). This case
is used later by implementing bpf_for_each_map() helper.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index a657860ecba5..092d2c734dd8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5250,13 +5250,19 @@ static void clear_caller_saved_regs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	}
 }
 
-static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
-			   int *insn_idx)
+typedef int (*set_callee_state_fn)(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+				   struct bpf_func_state *caller,
+				   struct bpf_func_state *callee,
+				   int insn_idx);
+
+static int __check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
+			     int *insn_idx, int subprog,
+			     set_callee_state_fn set_callee_st)
 {
 	struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state;
 	struct bpf_func_info_aux *func_info_aux;
 	struct bpf_func_state *caller, *callee;
-	int i, err, subprog, target_insn;
+	int err, target_insn;
 	bool is_global = false;
 
 	if (state->curframe + 1 >= MAX_CALL_FRAMES) {
@@ -5265,12 +5271,16 @@ static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 		return -E2BIG;
 	}
 
-	target_insn = *insn_idx + insn->imm;
-	subprog = find_subprog(env, target_insn + 1);
 	if (subprog < 0) {
-		verbose(env, "verifier bug. No program starts at insn %d\n",
-			target_insn + 1);
-		return -EFAULT;
+		target_insn = *insn_idx + insn->imm;
+		subprog = find_subprog(env, target_insn + 1);
+		if (subprog < 0) {
+			verbose(env, "verifier bug. No program starts at insn %d\n",
+				target_insn + 1);
+			return -EFAULT;
+		}
+	} else {
+		target_insn = env->subprog_info[subprog].start - 1;
 	}
 
 	caller = state->frame[state->curframe];
@@ -5327,11 +5337,9 @@ static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	/* copy r1 - r5 args that callee can access.  The copy includes parent
-	 * pointers, which connects us up to the liveness chain
-	 */
-	for (i = BPF_REG_1; i <= BPF_REG_5; i++)
-		callee->regs[i] = caller->regs[i];
+	err = set_callee_st(env, caller, callee, *insn_idx);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	clear_caller_saved_regs(env, caller->regs);
 
@@ -5350,6 +5358,26 @@ static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int set_callee_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+			    struct bpf_func_state *caller,
+			    struct bpf_func_state *callee, int insn_idx)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	/* copy r1 - r5 args that callee can access.  The copy includes parent
+	 * pointers, which connects us up to the liveness chain
+	 */
+	for (i = BPF_REG_1; i <= BPF_REG_5; i++)
+		callee->regs[i] = caller->regs[i];
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
+			   int *insn_idx)
+{
+	return __check_func_call(env, insn, insn_idx, -1, set_callee_state);
+}
+
 static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
 {
 	struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state;
-- 
2.24.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-25  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-25  7:33 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/11] bpf: add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/11] bpf: factor out visit_func_call_insn() in check_cfg() Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 21:54   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25 22:01     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/11] bpf: factor out verbose_invalid_scalar() Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 21:56   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25  7:33 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2021-02-25 22:05   ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/11] bpf: refactor check_func_call() to allow callback function Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25 22:31     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-26  0:08       ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-26  1:18         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-26  0:05     ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/11] bpf: add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 22:41   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-26  2:16     ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-26  3:22       ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-26  2:27   ` Cong Wang
2021-02-26  3:27     ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/11] bpf: add hashtab support for " Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 22:44   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/11] bpf: add arraymap " Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 22:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/11] libbpf: move function is_ldimm64() earlier in libbpf.c Yonghong Song
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/11] libbpf: support subprog address relocation Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 23:04   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/11] bpftool: print subprog address properly Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 23:04   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/11] selftests/bpf: add hashmap test for bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 23:25   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-26  3:24     ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/11] selftests/bpf: add arraymap " Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 23:26   ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210225073312.4120415-1-yhs@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox