BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/12] selftests/bpf: add arraymap test for bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:49:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210226204934.3885756-1-yhs@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210226204920.3884074-1-yhs@fb.com>

A test is added for arraymap and percpu arraymap. The test also
exercises the early return for the helper which does not
traverse all elements.
    $ ./test_progs -n 45
    #45/1 hash_map:OK
    #45/2 array_map:OK
    #45 for_each:OK
    Summary: 1/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c       | 57 +++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/for_each_array_map_elem.c       | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_array_map_elem.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c
index aa847cd9f71f..68eb12a287d4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/for_each.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include <network_helpers.h>
 #include "for_each_hash_map_elem.skel.h"
+#include "for_each_array_map_elem.skel.h"
 
 static unsigned int duration;
 
@@ -66,8 +67,64 @@ static void test_hash_map(void)
 	for_each_hash_map_elem__destroy(skel);
 }
 
+static void test_array_map(void)
+{
+	__u32 key, num_cpus, max_entries, retval;
+	int i, arraymap_fd, percpu_map_fd, err;
+	struct for_each_array_map_elem *skel;
+	__u64 *percpu_valbuf = NULL;
+	__u64 val, expected_total;
+
+	skel = for_each_array_map_elem__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "for_each_array_map_elem__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	arraymap_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.arraymap);
+	expected_total = 0;
+	max_entries = bpf_map__max_entries(skel->maps.arraymap);
+	for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
+		key = i;
+		val = i + 1;
+		/* skip the last iteration for expected total */
+		if (i != max_entries - 1)
+			expected_total += val;
+		err = bpf_map_update_elem(arraymap_fd, &key, &val, BPF_ANY);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "map_update"))
+			goto out;
+	}
+
+	num_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
+	percpu_map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu_map);
+	percpu_valbuf = malloc(sizeof(__u64) * num_cpus);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(percpu_valbuf, "percpu_valbuf"))
+		goto out;
+
+	key = 0;
+	for (i = 0; i < num_cpus; i++)
+		percpu_valbuf[i] = i + 1;
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(percpu_map_fd, &key, percpu_valbuf, BPF_ANY);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "percpu_map_update"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_pkt_access),
+				1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), NULL, NULL,
+				&retval, &duration);
+	if (CHECK(err || retval, "ipv4", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n",
+		  err, errno, retval))
+		goto out;
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arraymap_output, expected_total, "array_output");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->cpu + 1, skel->bss->percpu_val, "percpu_val");
+
+out:
+	free(percpu_valbuf);
+	for_each_array_map_elem__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 void test_for_each(void)
 {
 	if (test__start_subtest("hash_map"))
 		test_hash_map();
+	if (test__start_subtest("array_map"))
+		test_array_map();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_array_map_elem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_array_map_elem.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..75e8e1069fe7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/for_each_array_map_elem.c
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+	__uint(max_entries, 3);
+	__type(key, __u32);
+	__type(value, __u64);
+} arraymap SEC(".maps");
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+	__type(key, __u32);
+	__type(value, __u64);
+} percpu_map SEC(".maps");
+
+struct callback_ctx {
+	int output;
+};
+
+static __u64
+check_array_elem(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 *key, __u64 *val,
+		 struct callback_ctx *data)
+{
+	data->output += *val;
+	if (*key == 1)
+		return 1; /* stop the iteration */
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__u32 cpu = 0;
+__u64 percpu_val = 0;
+
+static __u64
+check_percpu_elem(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 *key, __u64 *val,
+		  struct callback_ctx *data)
+{
+	cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
+	percpu_val = *val;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+u32 arraymap_output = 0;
+
+SEC("classifier")
+int test_pkt_access(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct callback_ctx data;
+
+	data.output = 0;
+	bpf_for_each_map_elem(&arraymap, check_array_elem, &data, 0);
+	arraymap_output = data.output;
+
+	bpf_for_each_map_elem(&percpu_map, check_percpu_elem, (void *)0, 0);
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.24.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-26 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-26 20:49 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/12] bpf: add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/12] bpf: factor out visit_func_call_insn() in check_cfg() Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/12] bpf: factor out verbose_invalid_scalar() Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/12] bpf: refactor check_func_call() to allow callback function Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/12] bpf: change return value of verifier function add_subprog() Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/12] bpf: add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 21:29   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/12] bpf: add hashtab support for " Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/12] bpf: add arraymap " Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/12] libbpf: move function is_ldimm64() earlier in libbpf.c Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/12] libbpf: support subprog address relocation Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/12] bpftool: print subprog address properly Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/12] selftests/bpf: add hashmap test for bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-26 20:49 ` Yonghong Song [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210226204934.3885756-1-yhs@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox