From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C13C433DB for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 10:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84DF64EB5 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 10:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235167AbhCNKPk (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:15:40 -0400 Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.134]:42922 "EHLO mail-40134.protonmail.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235134AbhCNKPR (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Mar 2021 06:15:17 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 10:15:10 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pm.me; s=protonmail; t=1615716915; bh=bM7cn3Afzu5HwMEmA8LHq+iVZuDxZxEEQbnZuhdZvEg=; h=Date:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jpFMl4hp7PYW0YfoBbb27jcEpamNRG53Kbe0U4P2zNXtu+ZXg4SYVY5cMuyC+d0Hn V28lFAHmNlil0dmG4Z1dDYZggrLQpnNsWqRSRCBKEFBdDMVfIrEDaT79OzsUEUyHNd RVZ6sE83S0YPfPROa9KrfykjYGmNqzQIS6FstZTSYR9ufeNuJcPKk//7GfNDWbBmSl 7nNb9EOCDNOCpfI+HiVZglkkQOAylsmb//HzrFHW/aTb2mcIoEa+XOYenZH/w3+YFJ 8hiSEYw7zShjXaIgNe4u7UipqQ4QT/Y1UNl0s+//0XNgxY+1weKsbVWeeqNLqXR2YO fHCM1UpjZ+8SQ== From: Alexander Lobakin Cc: Alexander Lobakin , kuba@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com, willemb@google.com, haokexin@gmail.com, pablo@netfilter.org, jakub@cloudflare.com, elver@google.com, decui@microsoft.com, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, lariel@mellanox.com, wangqing@vivo.com, dcaratti@redhat.com, gnault@redhat.com, eranbe@nvidia.com, mchehab+huawei@kernel.org, ktkhai@virtuozzo.com, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: Alexander Lobakin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/6] skbuff: micro-optimize flow dissection Message-ID: <20210314101452.2482-1-alobakin@pm.me> In-Reply-To: <20210313.181000.1671061556553245861.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20210313113645.5949-1-alobakin@pm.me> <20210313.181000.1671061556553245861.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org From: David Miller Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 18:10:00 -0800 (PST) > None of these apply to net-next as per the patchwork automated checks. A= ny idea why? No unfortunately. That'why I sent a follow-up mail. All of them successfully apply to pure net-next on my machine. Can it be a Git version conflict? I use 2.30.2, but also tried 2.30.1 and the latest development snapshot, and in either case they got applied with no problems. I could have more clue if NIPA provided more detailed log, but didn't find any. And apply_patches stage doesn't seem to be present on NIPA GitHub repo, so I couldn't reproduce it 1:1. I can try again on Monday, not sure if it will help. I also sent another series yesterday, and it has 15 green lights on Patchwork, so this problem seems to take place only with this particular series. > Thanks. Thanks, Al