From: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <kernel-team@fb.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: refine retval for bpf_get_task_stack helper
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:55:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210416025537.2352753-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com> (raw)
Similarly to the bpf_get_stack helper, bpf_get_task_stack's return value
can be more tightly bound by the verifier - it's the number of bytes
written to a user-supplied buffer, or a negative error value. Currently
the verifier believes bpf_task_get_stack's retval bounds to be unknown,
requiring extraneous bounds checking to remedy.
Adding it to do_refine_retval_range fixes the issue, as evidenced by
new selftests which fail to load if retval bounds are not refined.
Dave Marchevsky (3):
bpf: refine retval for bpf_get_task_stack helper
bpf/selftests: add bpf_get_task_stack retval bounds verifier test
bpf/selftests: add bpf_get_task_stack retval bounds test_prog
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 +
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 1 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_stack.c | 22 ++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_get_stack.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-16 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-16 2:55 Dave Marchevsky [this message]
2021-04-16 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: refine retval for bpf_get_task_stack helper Dave Marchevsky
2021-04-16 16:53 ` Song Liu
2021-04-16 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf/selftests: add bpf_get_task_stack retval bounds verifier test Dave Marchevsky
2021-04-16 17:09 ` Song Liu
2021-04-16 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpf/selftests: add bpf_get_task_stack retval bounds test_prog Dave Marchevsky
2021-04-16 17:06 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210416025537.2352753-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--to=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).