From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: Allow decimal offset for kprobes
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 23:58:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210721215810.889975-3-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210721215810.889975-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Allow to specify decimal offset in SEC macro, like:
SEC("kprobe/bpf_fentry_test7+5")
Adding selftest for that.
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c | 2 ++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index d46c2dd37be2..52f4f1d4f495 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -10424,7 +10424,7 @@ static struct bpf_link *attach_kprobe(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec,
func_name = prog->sec_name + sec->len;
opts.retprobe = strcmp(sec->sec, "kretprobe/") == 0;
- n = sscanf(func_name, "%m[a-zA-Z0-9_.]+%lx", &func, &offset);
+ n = sscanf(func_name, "%m[a-zA-Z0-9_.]+%li", &func, &offset);
if (n < 1) {
err = -EINVAL;
pr_warn("kprobe name is invalid: %s\n", func_name);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
index 088b3653610d..02a465f36d59 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
*/
#ifndef __x86_64__
bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test6, false);
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test7, false);
#endif
err = get_func_ip_test__load(skel);
@@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test5_result, 1, "test5_result");
#ifdef __x86_64__
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test6_result, 1, "test6_result");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test7_result, 1, "test7_result");
#endif
cleanup:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
index acd587b6e859..a587aeca5ae0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ extern const void bpf_fentry_test3 __ksym;
extern const void bpf_fentry_test4 __ksym;
extern const void bpf_modify_return_test __ksym;
extern const void bpf_fentry_test6 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test7 __ksym;
__u64 test1_result = 0;
SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1")
@@ -71,3 +72,13 @@ int test6(struct pt_regs *ctx)
test6_result = (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test6 + 5;
return 0;
}
+
+__u64 test7_result = 0;
+SEC("kprobe/bpf_fentry_test7+5")
+int test7(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ __u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
+
+ test7_result = (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test7 + 5;
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-21 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-21 21:58 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: Export bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts function Jiri Olsa
2021-07-21 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] libbpf: Fix func leak in attach_kprobe Jiri Olsa
2021-07-22 7:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-07-21 21:58 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-07-21 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] libbpf: Export bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts function Jiri Olsa
2021-07-23 3:06 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-07-22 12:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] " Alan Maguire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210721215810.889975-3-jolsa@kernel.org \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).