From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: clear zext_dst of dead insns
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 16:05:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210812140518.183178-2-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210812140518.183178-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>
"access skb fields ok" verifier test fails on s390 with the "verifier
bug. zext_dst is set, but no reg is defined" message. The first insns
of the test prog are:
0: 61 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 ldxw %r0,[%r1+0]
8: 35 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 jge %r0,0,1
10: 61 01 00 08 00 00 00 00 ldxw %r0,[%r1+8]
and the 3rd one is dead (this does not look intentional to me, but this
is a separate topic).
sanitize_dead_code() converts dead insns into "ja -1", but keeps
zext_dst. When opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32() tries to parse such
an insn, it sees this discrepancy and bails. This problem can be seen
only with JITs whose bpf_jit_needs_zext() returns true.
Fix by clearning dead insns' zext_dst.
The commits that contributed to this problem are:
1. commit 5aa5bd14c5f8 ("bpf: add initial suite for selftests"), which
introduced the test with the dead code.
2. commit 5327ed3d44b7 ("bpf: verifier: mark verified-insn with
sub-register zext flag"), which introduced the zext_dst flag.
3. commit 83a2881903f3 ("bpf: Account for BPF_FETCH in
insn_has_def32()"), which introduced the sanity check.
4. commit 9183671af6db ("bpf: Fix leakage under speculation on
mispredicted branches"), which bisect points to.
It's best to fix this on stable branches that contain the second one,
since that's the point where the inconsistency was introduced.
Fixes: 5327ed3d44b7 ("bpf: verifier: mark verified-insn with sub-register zext flag")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index f9bda5476ea5..381d3d6f24bc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -11663,6 +11663,7 @@ static void sanitize_dead_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (aux_data[i].seen)
continue;
memcpy(insn + i, &trap, sizeof(trap));
+ aux_data[i].zext_dst = false;
}
}
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-12 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-12 14:05 [PATCH bpf 0/2] bpf: clear zext_dst of dead insns Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-08-12 14:05 ` Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2021-08-12 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests: bpf: test that dead ldx_w insns are accepted Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-08-12 15:09 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210812140518.183178-2-iii@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).