From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, shayagr@amazon.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, dsahern@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 bpf-next 11/18] bpf: introduce bpf_xdp_get_buff_len helper
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 23:18:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202108132359.cCW4wDR7-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a742a962e3843b1ee85ed56ca934f15f61366a71.1628854454.git.lorenzo@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 12650 bytes --]
Hi Lorenzo,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Lorenzo-Bianconi/mvneta-introduce-XDP-multi-buffer-support/20210813-195127
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
config: i386-randconfig-s001-20210813 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
# sparse version: v0.6.3-348-gf0e6938b-dirty
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/cc503b94d65009817ca899171fbd0514046415f2
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Lorenzo-Bianconi/mvneta-introduce-XDP-multi-buffer-support/20210813-195127
git checkout cc503b94d65009817ca899171fbd0514046415f2
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash net/core/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
net/core/filter.c:431:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:434:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:437:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:440:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:443:33: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:517:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:520:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:523:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:1411:39: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct sock_filter const *filter @@ got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter @@
net/core/filter.c:1411:39: sparse: expected struct sock_filter const *filter
net/core/filter.c:1411:39: sparse: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter
net/core/filter.c:1489:39: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct sock_filter const *filter @@ got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter @@
net/core/filter.c:1489:39: sparse: expected struct sock_filter const *filter
net/core/filter.c:1489:39: sparse: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter
net/core/filter.c:2296:45: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr @@ got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh @@
net/core/filter.c:2296:45: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr
net/core/filter.c:2296:45: sparse: got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh
>> net/core/filter.c:3801:29: sparse: sparse: symbol 'bpf_xdp_get_buff_len_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:8113:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:8116:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:8119:27: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
net/core/filter.c:9968:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_filter_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:9975:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_filter_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:9979:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tc_cls_act_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:9988:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tc_cls_act_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:9992:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'xdp_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10003:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_skb_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10009:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_skb_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10013:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_in_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10019:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_in_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10023:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_out_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10029:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_out_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10033:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_xmit_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10040:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_xmit_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10044:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_seg6local_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10050:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_seg6local_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10054:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10060:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10063:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_addr_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10069:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_addr_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10072:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_ops_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10078:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_ops_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10081:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_skb_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10088:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_skb_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10091:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_msg_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10098:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_msg_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10101:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'flow_dissector_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10107:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'flow_dissector_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10434:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_reuseport_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10440:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_reuseport_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10616:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_lookup_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:10620:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_lookup_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/core/filter.c:246:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be16
net/core/filter.c:273:32: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __be32
net/core/filter.c:1910:43: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1910:43: sparse: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff
net/core/filter.c:1910:43: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1913:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1913:36: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old
net/core/filter.c:1913:36: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1913:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1913:42: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new
net/core/filter.c:1913:42: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1916:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1916:36: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1916:36: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1916:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1916:42: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1916:42: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1961:59: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1961:59: sparse: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff
net/core/filter.c:1961:59: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1964:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1964:52: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1964:52: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1964:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1964:58: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1964:58: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1967:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
net/core/filter.c:1967:52: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1967:52: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
net/core/filter.c:1967:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
net/core/filter.c:1967:58: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:1967:58: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
net/core/filter.c:2013:28: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long long @@ got restricted __wsum @@
net/core/filter.c:2013:28: sparse: expected unsigned long long
net/core/filter.c:2013:28: sparse: got restricted __wsum
net/core/filter.c:2035:35: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long long @@ got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum @@
net/core/filter.c:2035:35: sparse: expected unsigned long long
net/core/filter.c:2035:35: sparse: got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum
net/core/filter.c: note: in included file (through include/net/ip.h):
include/net/route.h:372:48: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [usertype] key @@ got restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr @@
include/net/route.h:372:48: sparse: expected unsigned int [usertype] key
include/net/route.h:372:48: sparse: got restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr
include/net/route.h:372:48: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [usertype] key @@ got restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr @@
include/net/route.h:372:48: sparse: expected unsigned int [usertype] key
include/net/route.h:372:48: sparse: got restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr
include/net/route.h:372:48: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [usertype] key @@ got restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr @@
include/net/route.h:372:48: sparse: expected unsigned int [usertype] key
include/net/route.h:372:48: sparse: got restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 36427 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-13 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-13 11:47 [PATCH v11 bpf-next 00/18] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 01/18] net: skbuff: add size metadata to skb_shared_info for xdp Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 02/18] xdp: introduce flags field in xdp_buff/xdp_frame Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 03/18] net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 04/18] net: mvneta: simplify mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment management Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 05/18] net: xdp: add xdp_update_skb_shared_info utility routine Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 06/18] net: marvell: rely on " Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 07/18] xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame} Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 08/18] net: mvneta: add multi buffer support to XDP_TX Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 09/18] net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames for XDP Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 10/18] bpf: add multi-buff support to the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 11/18] bpf: introduce bpf_xdp_get_buff_len helper Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 15:18 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-08-13 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH] bpf: bpf_xdp_get_buff_len_proto can be static kernel test robot
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 12/18] bpf: add multi-buffer support to xdp copy helpers Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 13/18] bpf: move user_size out of bpf_test_init Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 14/18] bpf: introduce multibuff support to bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 15/18] bpf: test_run: add xdp_shared_info pointer in bpf_test_finish signature Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 16/18] bpf: update xdp_adjust_tail selftest to include multi-buffer Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 17/18] net: xdp: introduce bpf_xdp_adjust_data helper Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-18 12:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-08-18 12:47 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-18 12:58 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-08-18 13:37 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-08-13 11:47 ` [PATCH v11 bpf-next 18/18] bpf: add bpf_xdp_adjust_data selftest Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202108132359.cCW4wDR7-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shayagr@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).