From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>, Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 22/27] selftests/bpf: Add fentry multi func test
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 21:39:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210826193922.66204-23-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210826193922.66204-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Adding selftest for fentry multi func test that attaches
to bpf_fentry_test* functions and checks argument values
based on the processed function.
We need to cast to real arguments types in multi_arg_check,
because the checked value can be shorter than u64.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 4 +-
.../bpf/prog_tests/multi_fentry_test.c | 30 +++++++++
.../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/multi_check.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/multi_fentry.c | 17 +++++
4 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/multi_fentry_test.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/multi_check.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/multi_fentry.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index 866531c08e4f..013d41c8edae 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -312,7 +312,8 @@ endef
SKEL_BLACKLIST := btf__% test_pinning_invalid.c test_sk_assign.c
LINKED_SKELS := test_static_linked.skel.h linked_funcs.skel.h \
- linked_vars.skel.h linked_maps.skel.h
+ linked_vars.skel.h linked_maps.skel.h \
+ multi_fentry_test.skel.h
LSKELS := kfunc_call_test.c fentry_test.c fexit_test.c fexit_sleep.c \
test_ksyms_module.c test_ringbuf.c atomics.c trace_printk.c
@@ -322,6 +323,7 @@ test_static_linked.skel.h-deps := test_static_linked1.o test_static_linked2.o
linked_funcs.skel.h-deps := linked_funcs1.o linked_funcs2.o
linked_vars.skel.h-deps := linked_vars1.o linked_vars2.o
linked_maps.skel.h-deps := linked_maps1.o linked_maps2.o
+multi_fentry_test.skel.h-deps := multi_fentry.o multi_check.o
LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.o,%.c,$(foreach skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/multi_fentry_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/multi_fentry_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8dc08c3e715f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/multi_fentry_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "multi_fentry_test.skel.h"
+#include "trace_helpers.h"
+
+void test_multi_fentry_test(void)
+{
+ struct multi_fentry_test *skel = NULL;
+ __u32 duration = 0, retval;
+ int err, prog_fd;
+
+ skel = multi_fentry_test__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "fentry_multi_skel_load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ err = multi_fentry_test__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fentry_attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run(prog_fd, 1, NULL, 0,
+ NULL, NULL, &retval, &duration);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(retval, 0, "test_run");
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_result, 8, "test_result");
+
+cleanup:
+ multi_fentry_test__destroy(skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/multi_check.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/multi_check.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..415c96684a30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/multi_check.c
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test1 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test2 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test3 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test4 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test5 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test6 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test7 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test8 __ksym;
+
+void multi_arg_check(__u64 *ctx, __u64 *test_result)
+{
+ void *ip = (void *) bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
+
+ if (ip == &bpf_fentry_test1) {
+ int a = (int) ctx[0];
+
+ *test_result += a == 1;
+ } else if (ip == &bpf_fentry_test2) {
+ int a = (int) ctx[0];
+ __u64 b = ctx[1];
+
+ *test_result += a == 2 && b == 3;
+ } else if (ip == &bpf_fentry_test3) {
+ int a = (int) ctx[0];
+ int b = (int) ctx[1];
+ __u64 c = ctx[2];
+
+ *test_result += a == 4 && b == 5 && c == 6;
+ } else if (ip == &bpf_fentry_test4) {
+ void *a = (void *) ctx[0];
+ int b = (int) ctx[1];
+ int c = (int) ctx[2];
+ __u64 d = ctx[3];
+
+ *test_result += a == (void *) 7 && b == 8 && c == 9 && d == 10;
+ } else if (ip == &bpf_fentry_test5) {
+ __u64 a = ctx[0];
+ void *b = (void *) ctx[1];
+ short c = (short) ctx[2];
+ int d = (int) ctx[3];
+ __u64 e = ctx[4];
+
+ *test_result += a == 11 && b == (void *) 12 && c == 13 && d == 14 && e == 15;
+ } else if (ip == &bpf_fentry_test6) {
+ __u64 a = ctx[0];
+ void *b = (void *) ctx[1];
+ short c = (short) ctx[2];
+ int d = (int) ctx[3];
+ void *e = (void *) ctx[4];
+ __u64 f = ctx[5];
+
+ *test_result += a == 16 && b == (void *) 17 && c == 18 && d == 19 && e == (void *) 20 && f == 21;
+ } else if (ip == &bpf_fentry_test7) {
+ *test_result += 1;
+ } else if (ip == &bpf_fentry_test8) {
+ *test_result += 1;
+ }
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/multi_fentry.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/multi_fentry.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b78d36772aa6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/multi_fentry.c
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+__u64 test_result = 0;
+
+__hidden extern void multi_arg_check(__u64 *ctx, __u64 *test_result);
+
+SEC("fentry.multi/bpf_fentry_test*")
+int BPF_PROG(test, __u64 a, __u64 b, __u64 c, __u64 d, __u64 e, __u64 f)
+{
+ multi_arg_check(ctx, &test_result);
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-26 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-26 19:38 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/27] x86/ftrace/bpf: Add batch support for direct/tracing attach Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/27] x86/ftrace: Remove extra orig rax move Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/27] x86/ftrace: Remove fault protection code in prepare_ftrace_return Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/27] x86/ftrace: Make function graph use ftrace directly Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/27] tracing: Add trampoline/graph selftest Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/27] ftrace: Add ftrace_add_rec_direct function Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/27] ftrace: Add multi direct register/unregister interface Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/27] ftrace: Add multi direct modify interface Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/27] ftrace/samples: Add multi direct interface test module Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/27] bpf: Add support to load multi func tracing program Jiri Olsa
2021-08-31 23:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-01 11:32 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/27] bpf: Add struct bpf_tramp_node layer Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/27] bpf: Factor out bpf_trampoline_init function Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/27] bpf: Factor out __bpf_trampoline_lookup function Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/27] bpf: Factor out __bpf_trampoline_put function Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 14/27] bpf: Change bpf_trampoline_get to return error pointer Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 15/27] bpf, x64: Allow to use caller address from stack Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 16/27] bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_multi_get/put functions Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 17/27] bpf: Add multi trampoline attach support Jiri Olsa
2021-08-31 23:36 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-01 0:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-01 11:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 18/27] bpf, x64: Store properly return value for trampoline with multi func programs Jiri Olsa
2021-08-31 23:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-01 15:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-09-02 3:56 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-02 12:57 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-09-02 16:54 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-02 21:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-09-03 9:50 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 19/27] bpf: Attach multi trampoline with ftrace_ops Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 20/27] libbpf: Add btf__find_by_glob_kind function Jiri Olsa
2021-09-01 0:10 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-01 11:33 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 21/27] libbpf: Add support to link multi func tracing program Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 23/27] selftests/bpf: Add fexit multi func test Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 24/27] selftests/bpf: Add fentry/fexit " Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 25/27] selftests/bpf: Add mixed " Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 26/27] selftests/bpf: Add attach " Jiri Olsa
2021-08-26 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 27/27] selftests/bpf: Add ret_mod " Jiri Olsa
2021-08-29 17:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/27] x86/ftrace/bpf: Add batch support for direct/tracing attach Alexei Starovoitov
2021-08-30 8:02 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210826193922.66204-23-jolsa@kernel.org \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox