From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, dxu@dxuuu.xyz,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix build of task_pt_regs tests for arm64
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 11:09:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210902090925.2010528-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> (raw)
struct pt_regs is not exported to userspace on all archs. arm64 and s390
export "user_pt_regs" instead, which causes build failure at the moment:
progs/test_task_pt_regs.c:8:16: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct pt_regs'
struct pt_regs current_regs = {};
Use the multi-arch macros defined by tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h to copy
the pt_regs into a locally-defined struct.
Copying the user_pt_regs struct on arm64 wouldn't work because the
struct is too large and the compiler complains about using too much
stack.
Fixes: 576d47bb1a92 ("bpf: selftests: Add bpf_task_pt_regs() selftest")
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
---
.../selftests/bpf/bpf_pt_regs_helpers.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_pt_regs.c | 1 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/test_task_pt_regs.c | 10 ++++---
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_pt_regs_helpers.h
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_pt_regs_helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_pt_regs_helpers.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7531f4824ead
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_pt_regs_helpers.h
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __BPF_PT_REGS_HELPERS
+#define __BPF_PT_REGS_HELPERS
+
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+struct bpf_pt_regs {
+ unsigned long long parm[5];
+ unsigned long long ret;
+ unsigned long long fp;
+ unsigned long long rc;
+ unsigned long long sp;
+ unsigned long long ip;
+};
+
+static inline void bpf_copy_pt_regs(struct bpf_pt_regs *dest, struct pt_regs *src)
+{
+ dest->parm[0] = PT_REGS_PARM1(src);
+ dest->parm[1] = PT_REGS_PARM2(src);
+ dest->parm[2] = PT_REGS_PARM3(src);
+ dest->parm[3] = PT_REGS_PARM4(src);
+ dest->parm[4] = PT_REGS_PARM5(src);
+ dest->ret = PT_REGS_RET(src);
+ dest->fp = PT_REGS_FP(src);
+ dest->rc = PT_REGS_RC(src);
+ dest->sp = PT_REGS_SP(src);
+ dest->ip = PT_REGS_IP(src);
+}
+
+#endif /* __BPF_PT_REGS_HELPERS */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_pt_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_pt_regs.c
index 53f0e0fa1a53..196453b75937 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_pt_regs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_pt_regs.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <test_progs.h>
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
+#include "bpf_pt_regs_helpers.h"
#include "test_task_pt_regs.skel.h"
void test_task_pt_regs(void)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_task_pt_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_task_pt_regs.c
index 6c059f1cfa1b..348da3509093 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_task_pt_regs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_task_pt_regs.c
@@ -5,8 +5,10 @@
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
-struct pt_regs current_regs = {};
-struct pt_regs ctx_regs = {};
+#include "bpf_pt_regs_helpers.h"
+
+struct bpf_pt_regs current_regs = {};
+struct bpf_pt_regs ctx_regs = {};
int uprobe_res = 0;
SEC("uprobe/trigger_func")
@@ -17,8 +19,8 @@ int handle_uprobe(struct pt_regs *ctx)
current = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
regs = (struct pt_regs *) bpf_task_pt_regs(current);
- __builtin_memcpy(¤t_regs, regs, sizeof(*regs));
- __builtin_memcpy(&ctx_regs, ctx, sizeof(*ctx));
+ bpf_copy_pt_regs(¤t_regs, regs);
+ bpf_copy_pt_regs(&ctx_regs, ctx);
/* Prove that uprobe was run */
uprobe_res = 1;
--
2.33.0
next reply other threads:[~2021-09-02 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-02 9:09 Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2021-09-02 18:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix build of task_pt_regs tests for arm64 Daniel Xu
2021-09-02 19:13 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-09-03 12:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-09-03 16:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210902090925.2010528-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--to=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox