BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix a few compiler warnings
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:33:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210917043343.3711917-1-yhs@fb.com> (raw)

With clang building selftests/bpf, I hit a few warnings like below:

  .../bpf_iter.c:592:48: warning: variable 'expected_key_c' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
  __u32 expected_key_a = 0, expected_key_b = 0, expected_key_c = 0;
                                                ^

  .../bpf_iter.c:688:48: warning: variable 'expected_key_c' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
  __u32 expected_key_a = 0, expected_key_b = 0, expected_key_c = 0;
                                                ^

  .../tc_redirect.c:657:6: warning: variable 'target_fd' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
  if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "setns " NS_FWD))
      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  .../tc_redirect.c:743:6: note: uninitialized use occurs here
  if (target_fd >= 0)
      ^~~~~~~~~

Removing unused variables and initializing the previously-uninitialized variable
to ensure these warnings are gone.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c    | 6 ++----
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
index 77ac24b191d4..9454331aaf85 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
@@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
 
 static void test_bpf_hash_map(void)
 {
-	__u32 expected_key_a = 0, expected_key_b = 0, expected_key_c = 0;
+	__u32 expected_key_a = 0, expected_key_b = 0;
 	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts);
 	struct bpf_iter_bpf_hash_map *skel;
 	int err, i, len, map_fd, iter_fd;
@@ -638,7 +638,6 @@ static void test_bpf_hash_map(void)
 		val = i + 4;
 		expected_key_a += key.a;
 		expected_key_b += key.b;
-		expected_key_c += key.c;
 		expected_val += val;
 
 		err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &val, BPF_ANY);
@@ -685,7 +684,7 @@ static void test_bpf_hash_map(void)
 
 static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void)
 {
-	__u32 expected_key_a = 0, expected_key_b = 0, expected_key_c = 0;
+	__u32 expected_key_a = 0, expected_key_b = 0;
 	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts);
 	struct bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map *skel;
 	int err, i, j, len, map_fd, iter_fd;
@@ -722,7 +721,6 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void)
 		key.c = i + 3;
 		expected_key_a += key.a;
 		expected_key_b += key.b;
-		expected_key_c += key.c;
 
 		for (j = 0; j < bpf_num_possible_cpus(); j++) {
 			*(__u32 *)(val + j * 8) = i + j;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c
index e7201ba29ccd..e87bc4466d9a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ static void test_tc_redirect_peer_l3(struct netns_setup_result *setup_result)
 	struct nstoken *nstoken = NULL;
 	int err;
 	int tunnel_pid = -1;
-	int src_fd, target_fd;
+	int src_fd, target_fd = -1;
 	int ifindex;
 
 	/* Start a L3 TUN/TAP tunnel between the src and dst namespaces.
-- 
2.30.2


                 reply	other threads:[~2021-09-17  4:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210917043343.3711917-1-yhs@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox