From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] btf_dump fixes for s390
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 18:08:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211013160902.428340-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012023218.399568-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
v1 -> v2:
- Remove redundant local variables, use t->size directly instead.
- Add btf__align_of() patch.
Pending questions:
- Can things like defined(__i386__) break cross-compilation?
- Why exactly do we need both cpu_number and cpu_profile_flip? If we do,
is there a suitable replacement for cpu_number in common code?
---
Hi,
This series along with [1] and [2] fixes all the failures in the
btf_dump testsuite currently present on s390, in particular:
* [1] fixes intermittent build bug causing "failed to encode tag ..."
* error messages.
* [2] fixes missing VAR entries on s390.
* Patch 1 disables Intel-specific code in a testcase.
* Patch 2 fixes an endianness-related bug.
* Patch 3 fixes an alignment-related bug.
* Patch 4 improves overly pessimistic alignment handling.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012022521.399302-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211012022637.399365-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
Best regards,
Ilya
Ilya Leoshkevich (4):
selftests/bpf: Use cpu_number only on arches that have it
libbpf: Fix dumping big-endian bitfields
libbpf: Fix dumping non-aligned __int128
libbpf: Fix ptr_is_aligned() usages
tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c | 34 +++++++++----------
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-10-13 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-13 16:08 Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2021-10-13 16:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] selftests/bpf: Use cpu_number only on arches that have it Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-13 16:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] libbpf: Fix dumping big-endian bitfields Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-13 16:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] libbpf: Fix dumping non-aligned __int128 Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-13 16:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] libbpf: Fix ptr_is_aligned() usages Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-20 18:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-20 23:02 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-20 23:10 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-10-21 10:29 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2021-10-20 18:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] btf_dump fixes for s390 Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211013160902.428340-1-iii@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).