From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: <andrii@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: make perf_buffer selftests work on 4.9 kernel again
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:13:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211022201342.3490692-1-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
Recent change to use tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep for perf_buffer
selftests causes this selftest to fail on 4.9 kernel in libbpf CI ([0]):
libbpf: prog 'handle_sys_enter': failed to attach to perf_event FD 6: Invalid argument
libbpf: prog 'handle_sys_enter': failed to attach to tracepoint 'syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep': Invalid argument
It's not exactly clear why, because perf_event itself is created for
this tracepoint, but I can't even compile 4.9 kernel locally, so it's
hard to figure this out. If anyone has better luck and would like to
help investigating this, I'd really appreciate this.
For now, unblock CI by switching back to raw_syscalls/sys_enter, but reduce
amount of unnecessary samples emitted by filter by process ID. Use
explicit ARRAY map for that to make it work on 4.9 as well, because
global data isn't yet supported there.
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Fixes: aa274f98b269 ("selftests/bpf: Fix possible/online index mismatch in perf_buffer test")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c | 5 +++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/test_perf_buffer.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
index 0b0cd045979b..4e32f3586a75 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ int trigger_on_cpu(int cpu)
void serial_test_perf_buffer(void)
{
int err, on_len, nr_on_cpus = 0, nr_cpus, i, j;
+ int zero = 0, my_pid = getpid();
struct perf_buffer_opts pb_opts = {};
struct test_perf_buffer *skel;
cpu_set_t cpu_seen;
@@ -71,6 +72,10 @@ void serial_test_perf_buffer(void)
if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_load", "skeleton open/load failed\n"))
goto out_close;
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.my_pid_map), &zero, &my_pid, 0);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "my_pid_update"))
+ goto out_close;
+
/* attach probe */
err = test_perf_buffer__attach(skel);
if (CHECK(err, "attach_kprobe", "err %d\n", err))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_perf_buffer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_perf_buffer.c
index a08874c5bdf2..17d5b67744d5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_perf_buffer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_perf_buffer.c
@@ -6,20 +6,36 @@
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, int);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+} my_pid_map SEC(".maps");
+
struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY);
__type(key, int);
__type(value, int);
} perf_buf_map SEC(".maps");
-SEC("tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep")
+SEC("tp/raw_syscalls/sys_enter")
int handle_sys_enter(void *ctx)
{
+ int zero = 0, *my_pid, cur_pid;
int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
+ my_pid = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&my_pid_map, &zero);
+ if (!my_pid)
+ return 1;
+
+ cur_pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
+ if (cur_pid != *my_pid)
+ return 1;
+
bpf_perf_event_output(ctx, &perf_buf_map, BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU,
&cpu, sizeof(cpu));
- return 0;
+ return 1;
}
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.30.2
reply other threads:[~2021-10-22 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211022201342.3490692-1-andrii@kernel.org \
--to=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).