From: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <andrii@kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<Kernel-team@fb.com>, Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_loop test
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:37:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211129223725.2770730-3-joannekoong@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211129223725.2770730-1-joannekoong@fb.com>
Add test for bpf_loop testing a variety of cases:
various nr_loops, null callback ctx, invalid flags, nested callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop.c | 99 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 237 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..31b8e7715f07
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_loop.c
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <network_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_loop.skel.h"
+
+static void check_nr_loops(struct bpf_loop *skel)
+{
+ __u32 retval, duration;
+ int err;
+
+ /* test 0 loops */
+ skel->bss->nr_loops = 0;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_prog),
+ 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), NULL, NULL,
+ &retval, &duration);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "err") || !ASSERT_OK(retval, "retval"))
+ return;
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->nr_loops_returned, skel->bss->nr_loops,
+ "0 loops");
+
+ /* test 500 loops */
+ skel->bss->nr_loops = 500;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_prog),
+ 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), NULL, NULL,
+ &retval, &duration);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "err") ||
+ !ASSERT_OK(retval, "retval"))
+ return;
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->nr_loops_returned, skel->bss->nr_loops,
+ "500 loops");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->g_output, (500 * 499) / 2, "g_output");
+
+ /* test exceeding the max limit */
+ skel->bss->nr_loops = -1;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_prog),
+ 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), NULL, NULL,
+ &retval, &duration);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "err") || !ASSERT_OK(retval, "retval"))
+ return;
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->err, -E2BIG, "over max limit");
+}
+
+static void check_callback_fn_stop(struct bpf_loop *skel)
+{
+ __u32 retval, duration;
+ int err;
+
+ skel->bss->nr_loops = 400;
+ skel->data->stop_index = 50;
+
+ /* testing that loop is stopped when callback_fn returns 1 */
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_prog),
+ 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), NULL, NULL,
+ &retval, &duration);
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "err") || !ASSERT_OK(retval, "retval"))
+ return;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->nr_loops_returned, skel->data->stop_index + 1,
+ "nr_loops_returned");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->g_output, (50 * 49) / 2,
+ "g_output");
+}
+
+static void check_null_callback_ctx(struct bpf_loop *skel)
+{
+ __u32 retval, duration;
+ int err;
+
+ skel->bss->nr_loops = 10;
+
+ /* check that user is able to pass in a null callback_ctx */
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.prog_null_ctx),
+ 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), NULL, NULL,
+ &retval, &duration);
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "err") || !ASSERT_OK(retval, "retval"))
+ return;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->nr_loops_returned, skel->bss->nr_loops,
+ "nr_loops_returned");
+}
+
+static void check_invalid_flags(struct bpf_loop *skel)
+{
+ __u32 retval, duration;
+ int err;
+
+ /* check that passing in non-zero flags returns -EINVAL */
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.prog_invalid_flags),
+ 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), NULL, NULL,
+ &retval, &duration);
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "err") || !ASSERT_OK(retval, "retval"))
+ return;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->err, -EINVAL, "err");
+}
+
+static void check_nested_calls(struct bpf_loop *skel)
+{
+ __u32 nr_loops = 100, nested_callback_nr_loops = 4;
+ __u32 retval, duration;
+ int err;
+
+ skel->bss->nr_loops = nr_loops;
+ skel->bss->nested_callback_nr_loops = nested_callback_nr_loops;
+
+ /* check that nested calls are supported */
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.prog_nested_calls),
+ 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), NULL, NULL,
+ &retval, &duration);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "err") || !ASSERT_OK(retval, "retval"))
+ return;
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->nr_loops_returned, nr_loops * nested_callback_nr_loops
+ * nested_callback_nr_loops, "nr_loops_returned");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->g_output, (4 * 3) / 2 * nested_callback_nr_loops
+ * nr_loops, "g_output");
+}
+
+void test_bpf_loop(void)
+{
+ struct bpf_loop *skel;
+
+ skel = bpf_loop__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_loop__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ check_nr_loops(skel);
+ check_callback_fn_stop(skel);
+ check_null_callback_ctx(skel);
+ check_invalid_flags(skel);
+ check_nested_calls(skel);
+
+ bpf_loop__destroy(skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f5437792fe0f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop.c
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+struct callback_ctx {
+ int output;
+};
+
+/* These should be set by the user program */
+u32 nested_callback_nr_loops;
+u32 stop_index = -1;
+u32 nr_loops;
+
+/* Making these global variables so that the userspace program
+ * can verify the output through the skeleton
+ */
+int nr_loops_returned;
+int g_output;
+int err;
+
+static int callback(__u32 index, void *data)
+{
+ struct callback_ctx *ctx = data;
+
+ if (index >= stop_index)
+ return 1;
+
+ ctx->output += index;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int empty_callback(__u32 index, void *data)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int nested_callback2(__u32 index, void *data)
+{
+ nr_loops_returned += bpf_loop(nested_callback_nr_loops, callback, data, 0);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int nested_callback1(__u32 index, void *data)
+{
+ bpf_loop(nested_callback_nr_loops, nested_callback2, data, 0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int test_prog(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct callback_ctx data = {};
+
+ nr_loops_returned = bpf_loop(nr_loops, callback, &data, 0);
+
+ if (nr_loops_returned < 0)
+ err = nr_loops_returned;
+ else
+ g_output = data.output;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int prog_null_ctx(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ nr_loops_returned = bpf_loop(nr_loops, empty_callback, NULL, 0);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int prog_invalid_flags(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct callback_ctx data = {};
+
+ err = bpf_loop(nr_loops, callback, &data, 1);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int prog_nested_calls(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct callback_ctx data = {};
+
+ nr_loops_returned = 0;
+ bpf_loop(nr_loops, nested_callback1, &data, 0);
+
+ g_output = data.output;
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-29 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-29 22:37 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/4] Add bpf_loop helper Joanne Koong
2021-11-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/4] bpf: " Joanne Koong
2021-11-29 22:48 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-11-30 16:54 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-11-29 22:37 ` Joanne Koong [this message]
2021-11-29 22:52 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_loop test Andrii Nakryiko
2021-11-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: measure bpf_loop verifier performance Joanne Koong
2021-11-29 22:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-11-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] selftest/bpf/benchs: add bpf_loop benchmark Joanne Koong
2021-11-29 23:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-11-30 16:53 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211129223725.2770730-3-joannekoong@fb.com \
--to=joannekoong@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox