From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix a clang deprecated-declarations compilation error
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 11:40:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220217194005.2765348-1-yhs@fb.com> (raw)
Build the kernel and selftest with clang compiler with LLVM=1,
make -j LLVM=1
make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf -j LLVM=1
I hit the following selftests/bpf compilation error:
In file included from test_cpp.cpp:3:
/.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf.h:73:8:
error: 'relaxed_core_relocs' is deprecated: libbpf v0.6+: field has no effect [-Werror,-Wdeprecated-declarations]
struct bpf_object_open_opts {
^
test_cpp.cpp:56:2: note: in implicit move constructor for 'bpf_object_open_opts' first required here
LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
^
/.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:77:3: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_OPTS'
(struct TYPE) { \
^
/.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf.h:90:2: note: 'relaxed_core_relocs' has been explicitly marked deprecated here
LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(0, 6, "field has no effect")
^
/.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:24:4: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE'
(LIBBPF_DEPRECATED("libbpf v" # major "." # minor "+: " msg))
^
/.../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/libbpf_common.h:19:47: note: expanded from macro 'LIBBPF_DEPRECATED'
#define LIBBPF_DEPRECATED(msg) __attribute__((deprecated(msg)))
There are two ways to fix the issue, one is to use GCC diagnostic ignore pragma, and the
other is to open code bpf_object_open_opts instead of using LIBBPF_OPTS.
Since in general LIBBPF_OPTS is preferred, the patch fixed the issue by
adding proper GCC diagnostic ignore pragmas.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
index 773f165c4898..19ad172036da 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause) */
#include <iostream>
+#pragma GCC diagnostic push
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations"
#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
+#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/btf.h>
#include "test_core_extern.skel.h"
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2022-02-17 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-17 19:40 Yonghong Song [this message]
2022-02-17 21:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix a clang deprecated-declarations compilation error Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-17 23:55 ` Yonghong Song
2022-02-20 0:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220217194005.2765348-1-yhs@fb.com \
--to=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox