From: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: <yhs@fb.com>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] Improve BPF test stability (related to perf events and scheduling)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 16:30:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220219003004.1085072-1-mykolal@fb.com> (raw)
In send_signal, replace sleep with dummy cpu intensive computation
to increase probability of child process being scheduled. Add few
more asserts.
In find_vma, reduce sample_freq as higher values may be rejected in
some qemu setups, remove usleep and increase length of cpu intensive
computation.
In bpf_cookie, perf_link and perf_branches, reduce sample_freq as
higher values may be rejected in some qemu setups
Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/find_vma.c | 5 ++---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c | 4 ++--
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c | 2 +-
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c | 14 ++++++++++----
5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
index cd10df6cd0fc..0612e79a9281 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static void pe_subtest(struct test_bpf_cookie *skel)
attr.type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE;
attr.config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK;
attr.freq = 1;
- attr.sample_freq = 4000;
+ attr.sample_freq = 1000;
pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1, 0, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
if (!ASSERT_GE(pfd, 0, "perf_fd"))
goto cleanup;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/find_vma.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/find_vma.c
index b74b3c0c555a..acc41223a112 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/find_vma.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/find_vma.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static int open_pe(void)
attr.type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE;
attr.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES;
attr.freq = 1;
- attr.sample_freq = 4000;
+ attr.sample_freq = 1000;
pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, 0, -1, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
return pfd >= 0 ? pfd : -errno;
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void test_find_vma_pe(struct find_vma *skel)
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_perf_event"))
goto cleanup;
- for (i = 0; i < 1000000; ++i)
+ for (i = 0; i < 1000000000; ++i)
++j;
test_and_reset_skel(skel, -EBUSY /* in nmi, irq_work is busy */);
@@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ void serial_test_find_vma(void)
skel->bss->addr = (__u64)(uintptr_t)test_find_vma_pe;
test_find_vma_pe(skel);
- usleep(100000); /* allow the irq_work to finish */
test_find_vma_kprobe(skel);
find_vma__destroy(skel);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c
index 12c4f45cee1a..bc24f83339d6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_branches.c
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static void test_perf_branches_hw(void)
attr.type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE;
attr.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES;
attr.freq = 1;
- attr.sample_freq = 4000;
+ attr.sample_freq = 1000;
attr.sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK;
attr.branch_sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER | PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY;
pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1, 0, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static void test_perf_branches_no_hw(void)
attr.type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE;
attr.config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK;
attr.freq = 1;
- attr.sample_freq = 4000;
+ attr.sample_freq = 1000;
pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1, 0, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
if (CHECK(pfd < 0, "perf_event_open", "err %d\n", pfd))
return;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c
index ede07344f264..224eba6fef2e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_link.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ void serial_test_perf_link(void)
attr.type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE;
attr.config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK;
attr.freq = 1;
- attr.sample_freq = 4000;
+ attr.sample_freq = 1000;
pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1, 0, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
if (!ASSERT_GE(pfd, 0, "perf_fd"))
goto cleanup;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
index 776916b61c40..841217bd1df6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
@@ -4,11 +4,12 @@
#include <sys/resource.h>
#include "test_send_signal_kern.skel.h"
-int sigusr1_received = 0;
+int sigusr1_received;
+volatile int volatile_variable;
static void sigusr1_handler(int signum)
{
- sigusr1_received++;
+ sigusr1_received = 1;
}
static void test_send_signal_common(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
@@ -42,7 +43,9 @@ static void test_send_signal_common(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
int old_prio;
/* install signal handler and notify parent */
+ errno = 0;
signal(SIGUSR1, sigusr1_handler);
+ ASSERT_OK(errno, "signal");
close(pipe_c2p[0]); /* close read */
close(pipe_p2c[1]); /* close write */
@@ -63,9 +66,12 @@ static void test_send_signal_common(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
ASSERT_EQ(read(pipe_p2c[0], buf, 1), 1, "pipe_read");
/* wait a little for signal handler */
- sleep(1);
+ for (int i = 0; i < 1000000000; i++)
+ volatile_variable++;
buf[0] = sigusr1_received ? '2' : '0';
+ ASSERT_EQ(sigusr1_received, 1, "sigusr1_received");
+
ASSERT_EQ(write(pipe_c2p[1], buf, 1), 1, "pipe_write");
/* wait for parent notification and exit */
@@ -110,9 +116,9 @@ static void test_send_signal_common(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
ASSERT_EQ(read(pipe_c2p[0], buf, 1), 1, "pipe_read");
/* trigger the bpf send_signal */
+ skel->bss->signal_thread = signal_thread;
skel->bss->pid = pid;
skel->bss->sig = SIGUSR1;
- skel->bss->signal_thread = signal_thread;
/* notify child that bpf program can send_signal now */
ASSERT_EQ(write(pipe_p2c[1], buf, 1), 1, "pipe_write");
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2022-02-19 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-19 0:30 Mykola Lysenko [this message]
2022-02-19 1:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next] Improve BPF test stability (related to perf events and scheduling) Song Liu
2022-02-22 20:00 ` Mykola Lysenko
2022-02-20 4:39 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-22 20:35 ` Mykola Lysenko
2022-02-23 3:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-23 4:32 ` Yonghong Song
2022-02-24 0:52 ` Mykola Lysenko
2022-03-01 3:45 ` Mykola Lysenko
2022-03-02 4:53 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220219003004.1085072-1-mykolal@fb.com \
--to=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox