From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
kernel-team@cloudflare.com, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: Fix test for 4-byte load from dst_port on big-endian
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 21:27:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220227202757.519015-4-jakub@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220227202757.519015-1-jakub@cloudflare.com>
The check for 4-byte load from dst_port offset into bpf_sock is failing on
big-endian architecture - s390. The bpf access converter rewrites the
4-byte load to a 2-byte load from sock_common at skc_dport offset, as shown
below.
* s390 / llvm-objdump -S --no-show-raw-insn
00000000000002a0 <sk_dst_port__load_word>:
84: r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 48)
85: w0 = 1
86: if w1 == 51966 goto +1 <LBB5_2>
87: w0 = 0
00000000000002c0 <LBB5_2>:
88: exit
* s390 / bpftool prog dump xlated
_Bool sk_dst_port__load_word(struct bpf_sock * sk):
35: (69) r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 +12)
36: (bc) w1 = w1
37: (b4) w0 = 1
38: (16) if w1 == 0xcafe goto pc+1
39: (b4) w0 = 0
40: (95) exit
* s390 / llvm-objdump -S --no-show-raw-insn
00000000000002a0 <sk_dst_port__load_word>:
84: r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 48)
85: w0 = 1
86: if w1 == 65226 goto +1 <LBB5_2>
87: w0 = 0
00000000000002c0 <LBB5_2>:
88: exit
* x86_64 / bpftool prog dump xlated
_Bool sk_dst_port__load_word(struct bpf_sock * sk):
33: (69) r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 +12)
34: (b4) w0 = 1
35: (16) if w1 == 0xfeca goto pc+1
36: (b4) w0 = 0
37: (95) exit
This leads to surprisings results. On big-endian platforms, the loaded
value is as expected. The user observes no difference between a 4-byte load
and 2-byte load. However, on little-endian platforms, the access conversion
is not what would be expected, that is the result is left shifted after
converting the value to the native byte order.
That said, 4-byte loads in BPF from sk->dst_port are not a use case we
expect to see, now that the dst_port field is clearly declared as a u16.
Account for the quirky behavior of the access converter in the test case,
so that the check passes on both endian variants.
Fixes: 8f50f16ff39d ("selftests/bpf: Extend verifier and bpf_sock tests for dst_port loads")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/test_sock_fields.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sock_fields.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sock_fields.c
index 186fed1deaab..3dddc173070c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sock_fields.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sock_fields.c
@@ -256,10 +256,23 @@ int ingress_read_sock_fields(struct __sk_buff *skb)
return CG_OK;
}
+/*
+ * NOTE: 4-byte load from bpf_sock at dst_port offset is quirky. The
+ * result is left shifted on little-endian architectures because the
+ * access is converted to a 2-byte load. The quirky behavior is kept
+ * for backward compatibility.
+ */
static __noinline bool sk_dst_port__load_word(struct bpf_sock *sk)
{
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
+ const __u8 SHIFT = 16;
+#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
+ const __u8 SHIFT = 0;
+#else
+#error "Unrecognized __BYTE_ORDER__"
+#endif
__u32 *word = (__u32 *)&sk->dst_port;
- return word[0] == bpf_htonl(0xcafe0000);
+ return word[0] == bpf_htonl(0xcafe << SHIFT);
}
static __noinline bool sk_dst_port__load_half(struct bpf_sock *sk)
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-27 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-27 20:27 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] Fixes for sock_fields selftests Jakub Sitnicki
2022-02-27 20:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] selftests/bpf: Fix error reporting from sock_fields programs Jakub Sitnicki
2022-02-27 20:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] selftests/bpf: Check dst_port only on the client socket Jakub Sitnicki
2022-03-01 6:25 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-03-03 17:34 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2022-02-27 20:27 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2022-03-01 6:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: Fix test for 4-byte load from dst_port on big-endian Martin KaFai Lau
2022-03-03 17:12 ` Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220227202757.519015-4-jakub@cloudflare.com \
--to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox