bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers
@ 2022-03-05  1:01 Andrii Nakryiko
  2022-03-05  1:01 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 1/3] libbpf: allow BPF program auto-attach handlers to bail out Andrii Nakryiko
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2022-03-05  1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf, ast, daniel; +Cc: andrii, kernel-team, Alan Maguire

Add ability for user applications and libraries to register custom BPF program
SEC() handlers. See patch #2 for examples where this is useful.

Patch #1 does some preliminary refactoring to allow exponsing program
init, preload, and attach callbacks as public API. It also establishes
a protocol to allow optional auto-attach behavior. This will also help the
case of sometimes auto-attachable uprobes.

v4->v5:
  - API documentation improvements (Daniel);
v3->v4:
  - init_fn -> prog_setup_fn, preload_fn -> prog_prepare_load_fn (Alexei);
v2->v3:
  - moved callbacks and cookie into OPTS struct (Alan);
  - added more test scenarios (Alan);
  - address most of Alan's feedback, but kept API name;
v1->v2:
  - resubmitting due to git send-email screw up.

Cc: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>

Andrii Nakryiko (3):
  libbpf: allow BPF program auto-attach handlers to bail out
  libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers
  selftests/bpf: add custom SEC() handling selftest

 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        | 332 ++++++++++++------
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h                        | 109 ++++++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map                      |   6 +
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h                |   2 +-
 .../bpf/prog_tests/custom_sec_handlers.c      | 176 ++++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/test_custom_sec_handlers.c      |  63 ++++
 6 files changed, 586 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/custom_sec_handlers.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_custom_sec_handlers.c

-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 bpf-next 1/3] libbpf: allow BPF program auto-attach handlers to bail out
  2022-03-05  1:01 [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2022-03-05  1:01 ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2022-03-05  1:01 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers Andrii Nakryiko
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2022-03-05  1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf, ast, daniel; +Cc: andrii, kernel-team, Alan Maguire

Allow some BPF program types to support auto-attach only in subste of
cases. Currently, if some BPF program type specifies attach callback, it
is assumed that during skeleton attach operation all such programs
either successfully attach or entire skeleton attachment fails. If some
program doesn't support auto-attachment from skeleton, such BPF program
types shouldn't have attach callback specified.

This is limiting for cases when, depending on how full the SEC("")
definition is, there could either be enough details to support
auto-attach or there might not be and user has to use some specific API
to provide more details at runtime.

One specific example of such desired behavior might be SEC("uprobe"). If
it's specified as just uprobe auto-attach isn't possible. But if it's
SEC("uprobe/<some_binary>:<some_func>") then there are enough details to
support auto-attach. Note that there is a somewhat subtle difference
between auto-attach behavior of BPF skeleton and using "generic"
bpf_program__attach(prog) (which uses the same attach handlers under the
cover). Skeleton allow some programs within bpf_object to not have
auto-attach implemented and doesn't treat that as an error. Instead such
BPF programs are just skipped during skeleton's (optional) attach step.
bpf_program__attach(), on the other hand, is called when user *expects*
auto-attach to work, so if specified program doesn't implement or
doesn't support auto-attach functionality, that will be treated as an
error.

Another improvement to the way libbpf is handling SEC()s would be to not
require providing dummy kernel function name for kprobe. Currently,
SEC("kprobe/whatever") is necessary even if actual kernel function is
determined by user at runtime and bpf_program__attach_kprobe() is used
to specify it. With changes in this patch, it's possible to support both
SEC("kprobe") and SEC("kprobe/<actual_kernel_function"), while only in
the latter case auto-attach will be performed. In the former one, such
kprobe will be skipped during skeleton attach operation.

Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 81bf01d67671..1da4a438ba00 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -201,11 +201,12 @@ struct reloc_desc {
 	};
 };
 
-struct bpf_sec_def;
-
-typedef int (*init_fn_t)(struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie);
-typedef int (*preload_fn_t)(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_prog_load_opts *opts, long cookie);
-typedef struct bpf_link *(*attach_fn_t)(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie);
+typedef int (*libbpf_prog_setup_fn_t)(struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie);
+typedef int (*libbpf_prog_prepare_load_fn_t)(struct bpf_program *prog,
+					     struct bpf_prog_load_opts *opts, long cookie);
+/* If auto-attach is not supported, callback should return 0 and set link to NULL */
+typedef int (*libbpf_prog_attach_fn_t)(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie,
+				       struct bpf_link **link);
 
 /* stored as sec_def->cookie for all libbpf-supported SEC()s */
 enum sec_def_flags {
@@ -239,9 +240,9 @@ struct bpf_sec_def {
 	enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
 	long cookie;
 
-	init_fn_t init_fn;
-	preload_fn_t preload_fn;
-	attach_fn_t attach_fn;
+	libbpf_prog_setup_fn_t prog_setup_fn;
+	libbpf_prog_prepare_load_fn_t prog_prepare_load_fn;
+	libbpf_prog_attach_fn_t prog_attach_fn;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -6572,9 +6573,9 @@ static int bpf_object__sanitize_prog(struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_program
 static int libbpf_find_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_program *prog, const char *attach_name,
 				     int *btf_obj_fd, int *btf_type_id);
 
-/* this is called as prog->sec_def->preload_fn for libbpf-supported sec_defs */
-static int libbpf_preload_prog(struct bpf_program *prog,
-			       struct bpf_prog_load_opts *opts, long cookie)
+/* this is called as prog->sec_def->prog_prepare_load_fn for libbpf-supported sec_defs */
+static int libbpf_prepare_prog_load(struct bpf_program *prog,
+				    struct bpf_prog_load_opts *opts, long cookie)
 {
 	enum sec_def_flags def = cookie;
 
@@ -6670,8 +6671,8 @@ static int bpf_object_load_prog_instance(struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_prog
 	load_attr.fd_array = obj->fd_array;
 
 	/* adjust load_attr if sec_def provides custom preload callback */
-	if (prog->sec_def && prog->sec_def->preload_fn) {
-		err = prog->sec_def->preload_fn(prog, &load_attr, prog->sec_def->cookie);
+	if (prog->sec_def && prog->sec_def->prog_prepare_load_fn) {
+		err = prog->sec_def->prog_prepare_load_fn(prog, &load_attr, prog->sec_def->cookie);
 		if (err < 0) {
 			pr_warn("prog '%s': failed to prepare load attributes: %d\n",
 				prog->name, err);
@@ -6971,8 +6972,8 @@ static int bpf_object_init_progs(struct bpf_object *obj, const struct bpf_object
 		/* sec_def can have custom callback which should be called
 		 * after bpf_program is initialized to adjust its properties
 		 */
-		if (prog->sec_def->init_fn) {
-			err = prog->sec_def->init_fn(prog, prog->sec_def->cookie);
+		if (prog->sec_def->prog_setup_fn) {
+			err = prog->sec_def->prog_setup_fn(prog, prog->sec_def->cookie);
 			if (err < 0) {
 				pr_warn("prog '%s': failed to initialize: %d\n",
 					prog->name, err);
@@ -8593,16 +8594,16 @@ int bpf_program__set_log_buf(struct bpf_program *prog, char *log_buf, size_t log
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_##ptype,				    \
 	.expected_attach_type = atype,					    \
 	.cookie = (long)(flags),					    \
-	.preload_fn = libbpf_preload_prog,				    \
+	.prog_prepare_load_fn = libbpf_prepare_prog_load,		    \
 	__VA_ARGS__							    \
 }
 
-static struct bpf_link *attach_kprobe(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie);
-static struct bpf_link *attach_tp(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie);
-static struct bpf_link *attach_raw_tp(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie);
-static struct bpf_link *attach_trace(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie);
-static struct bpf_link *attach_lsm(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie);
-static struct bpf_link *attach_iter(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie);
+static int attach_kprobe(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link);
+static int attach_tp(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link);
+static int attach_raw_tp(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link);
+static int attach_trace(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link);
+static int attach_lsm(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link);
+static int attach_iter(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link);
 
 static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = {
 	SEC_DEF("socket",		SOCKET_FILTER, 0, SEC_NONE | SEC_SLOPPY_PFX),
@@ -8752,7 +8753,7 @@ static char *libbpf_get_type_names(bool attach_type)
 		const struct bpf_sec_def *sec_def = &section_defs[i];
 
 		if (attach_type) {
-			if (sec_def->preload_fn != libbpf_preload_prog)
+			if (sec_def->prog_prepare_load_fn != libbpf_prepare_prog_load)
 				continue;
 
 			if (!(sec_def->cookie & SEC_ATTACHABLE))
@@ -9135,7 +9136,7 @@ int libbpf_attach_type_by_name(const char *name,
 		return libbpf_err(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
-	if (sec_def->preload_fn != libbpf_preload_prog)
+	if (sec_def->prog_prepare_load_fn != libbpf_prepare_prog_load)
 		return libbpf_err(-EINVAL);
 	if (!(sec_def->cookie & SEC_ATTACHABLE))
 		return libbpf_err(-EINVAL);
@@ -10109,14 +10110,13 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_kprobe(const struct bpf_program *prog,
 	return bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(prog, func_name, &opts);
 }
 
-static struct bpf_link *attach_kprobe(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie)
+static int attach_kprobe(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link)
 {
 	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_opts, opts);
 	unsigned long offset = 0;
-	struct bpf_link *link;
 	const char *func_name;
 	char *func;
-	int n, err;
+	int n;
 
 	opts.retprobe = str_has_pfx(prog->sec_name, "kretprobe/");
 	if (opts.retprobe)
@@ -10126,21 +10126,19 @@ static struct bpf_link *attach_kprobe(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cooki
 
 	n = sscanf(func_name, "%m[a-zA-Z0-9_.]+%li", &func, &offset);
 	if (n < 1) {
-		err = -EINVAL;
 		pr_warn("kprobe name is invalid: %s\n", func_name);
-		return libbpf_err_ptr(err);
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	if (opts.retprobe && offset != 0) {
 		free(func);
-		err = -EINVAL;
 		pr_warn("kretprobes do not support offset specification\n");
-		return libbpf_err_ptr(err);
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	opts.offset = offset;
-	link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(prog, func, &opts);
+	*link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(prog, func, &opts);
 	free(func);
-	return link;
+	return libbpf_get_error(*link);
 }
 
 static void gen_uprobe_legacy_event_name(char *buf, size_t buf_sz,
@@ -10395,14 +10393,13 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_tracepoint(const struct bpf_program *prog,
 	return bpf_program__attach_tracepoint_opts(prog, tp_category, tp_name, NULL);
 }
 
-static struct bpf_link *attach_tp(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie)
+static int attach_tp(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link)
 {
 	char *sec_name, *tp_cat, *tp_name;
-	struct bpf_link *link;
 
 	sec_name = strdup(prog->sec_name);
 	if (!sec_name)
-		return libbpf_err_ptr(-ENOMEM);
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	/* extract "tp/<category>/<name>" or "tracepoint/<category>/<name>" */
 	if (str_has_pfx(prog->sec_name, "tp/"))
@@ -10412,14 +10409,14 @@ static struct bpf_link *attach_tp(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie)
 	tp_name = strchr(tp_cat, '/');
 	if (!tp_name) {
 		free(sec_name);
-		return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	*tp_name = '\0';
 	tp_name++;
 
-	link = bpf_program__attach_tracepoint(prog, tp_cat, tp_name);
+	*link = bpf_program__attach_tracepoint(prog, tp_cat, tp_name);
 	free(sec_name);
-	return link;
+	return libbpf_get_error(*link);
 }
 
 struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint(const struct bpf_program *prog,
@@ -10452,7 +10449,7 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint(const struct bpf_program *pr
 	return link;
 }
 
-static struct bpf_link *attach_raw_tp(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie)
+static int attach_raw_tp(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link)
 {
 	static const char *const prefixes[] = {
 		"raw_tp/",
@@ -10472,10 +10469,11 @@ static struct bpf_link *attach_raw_tp(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cooki
 	if (!tp_name) {
 		pr_warn("prog '%s': invalid section name '%s'\n",
 			prog->name, prog->sec_name);
-		return libbpf_err_ptr(-EINVAL);
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	return bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint(prog, tp_name);
+	*link = bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint(prog, tp_name);
+	return libbpf_get_error(link);
 }
 
 /* Common logic for all BPF program types that attach to a btf_id */
@@ -10518,14 +10516,16 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_lsm(const struct bpf_program *prog)
 	return bpf_program__attach_btf_id(prog);
 }
 
-static struct bpf_link *attach_trace(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie)
+static int attach_trace(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link)
 {
-	return bpf_program__attach_trace(prog);
+	*link = bpf_program__attach_trace(prog);
+	return libbpf_get_error(*link);
 }
 
-static struct bpf_link *attach_lsm(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie)
+static int attach_lsm(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link)
 {
-	return bpf_program__attach_lsm(prog);
+	*link = bpf_program__attach_lsm(prog);
+	return libbpf_get_error(*link);
 }
 
 static struct bpf_link *
@@ -10654,17 +10654,33 @@ bpf_program__attach_iter(const struct bpf_program *prog,
 	return link;
 }
 
-static struct bpf_link *attach_iter(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie)
+static int attach_iter(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie, struct bpf_link **link)
 {
-	return bpf_program__attach_iter(prog, NULL);
+	*link = bpf_program__attach_iter(prog, NULL);
+	return libbpf_get_error(*link);
 }
 
 struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach(const struct bpf_program *prog)
 {
-	if (!prog->sec_def || !prog->sec_def->attach_fn)
-		return libbpf_err_ptr(-ESRCH);
+	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
+	int err;
+
+	if (!prog->sec_def || !prog->sec_def->prog_attach_fn)
+		return libbpf_err_ptr(-EOPNOTSUPP);
 
-	return prog->sec_def->attach_fn(prog, prog->sec_def->cookie);
+	err = prog->sec_def->prog_attach_fn(prog, prog->sec_def->cookie, &link);
+	if (err)
+		return libbpf_err_ptr(err);
+
+	/* When calling bpf_program__attach() explicitly, auto-attach support
+	 * is expected to work, so NULL returned link is considered an error.
+	 * This is different for skeleton's attach, see comment in
+	 * bpf_object__attach_skeleton().
+	 */
+	if (!link)
+		return libbpf_err_ptr(-EOPNOTSUPP);
+
+	return link;
 }
 
 static int bpf_link__detach_struct_ops(struct bpf_link *link)
@@ -11805,16 +11821,30 @@ int bpf_object__attach_skeleton(struct bpf_object_skeleton *s)
 			continue;
 
 		/* auto-attaching not supported for this program */
-		if (!prog->sec_def || !prog->sec_def->attach_fn)
+		if (!prog->sec_def || !prog->sec_def->prog_attach_fn)
 			continue;
 
-		*link = bpf_program__attach(prog);
-		err = libbpf_get_error(*link);
+		/* if user already set the link manually, don't attempt auto-attach */
+		if (*link)
+			continue;
+
+		err = prog->sec_def->prog_attach_fn(prog, prog->sec_def->cookie, link);
 		if (err) {
-			pr_warn("failed to auto-attach program '%s': %d\n",
+			pr_warn("prog '%s': failed to auto-attach: %d\n",
 				bpf_program__name(prog), err);
 			return libbpf_err(err);
 		}
+
+		/* It's possible that for some SEC() definitions auto-attach
+		 * is supported in some cases (e.g., if definition completely
+		 * specifies target information), but is not in other cases.
+		 * SEC("uprobe") is one such case. If user specified target
+		 * binary and function name, such BPF program can be
+		 * auto-attached. But if not, it shouldn't trigger skeleton's
+		 * attach to fail. It should just be skipped.
+		 * attach_fn signals such case with returning 0 (no error) and
+		 * setting link to NULL.
+		 */
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers
  2022-03-05  1:01 [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers Andrii Nakryiko
  2022-03-05  1:01 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 1/3] libbpf: allow BPF program auto-attach handlers to bail out Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2022-03-05  1:01 ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2022-03-05  1:01 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add custom SEC() handling selftest Andrii Nakryiko
  2022-03-05 17:50 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2022-03-05  1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf, ast, daniel; +Cc: andrii, kernel-team, Alan Maguire

Allow registering and unregistering custom handlers for BPF program.
This allows user applications and libraries to plug into libbpf's
declarative SEC() definition handling logic. This allows to offload
complex and intricate custom logic into external libraries, but still
provide a great user experience.

One such example is USDT handling library, which has a lot of code and
complexity which doesn't make sense to put into libbpf directly, but it
would be really great for users to be able to specify BPF programs with
something like SEC("usdt/<path-to-binary>:<usdt_provider>:<usdt_name>")
and have correct BPF program type set (BPF_PROGRAM_TYPE_KPROBE, as it is
uprobe) and even support BPF skeleton's auto-attach logic.

In some cases, it might be even good idea to override libbpf's default
handling, like for SEC("perf_event") programs. With custom library, it's
possible to extend logic to support specifying perf event specification
right there in SEC() definition without burdening libbpf with lots of
custom logic or extra library dependecies (e.g., libpfm4). With current
patch it's possible to override libbpf's SEC("perf_event") handling and
specify a completely custom ones.

Further, it's possible to specify a generic fallback handling for any
SEC() that doesn't match any other custom or standard libbpf handlers.
This allows to accommodate whatever legacy use cases there might be, if
necessary.

See doc comments for libbpf_register_prog_handler() and
libbpf_unregister_prog_handler() for detailed semantics.

This patch also bumps libbpf development version to v0.8 and adds new
APIs there.

Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c         | 204 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h         | 109 ++++++++++++++++++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map       |   6 +
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h |   2 +-
 4 files changed, 268 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 1da4a438ba00..43161fdd44bb 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -201,13 +201,6 @@ struct reloc_desc {
 	};
 };
 
-typedef int (*libbpf_prog_setup_fn_t)(struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie);
-typedef int (*libbpf_prog_prepare_load_fn_t)(struct bpf_program *prog,
-					     struct bpf_prog_load_opts *opts, long cookie);
-/* If auto-attach is not supported, callback should return 0 and set link to NULL */
-typedef int (*libbpf_prog_attach_fn_t)(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie,
-				       struct bpf_link **link);
-
 /* stored as sec_def->cookie for all libbpf-supported SEC()s */
 enum sec_def_flags {
 	SEC_NONE = 0,
@@ -235,10 +228,11 @@ enum sec_def_flags {
 };
 
 struct bpf_sec_def {
-	const char *sec;
+	char *sec;
 	enum bpf_prog_type prog_type;
 	enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
 	long cookie;
+	int handler_id;
 
 	libbpf_prog_setup_fn_t prog_setup_fn;
 	libbpf_prog_prepare_load_fn_t prog_prepare_load_fn;
@@ -8590,7 +8584,7 @@ int bpf_program__set_log_buf(struct bpf_program *prog, char *log_buf, size_t log
 }
 
 #define SEC_DEF(sec_pfx, ptype, atype, flags, ...) {			    \
-	.sec = sec_pfx,							    \
+	.sec = (char *)sec_pfx,						    \
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_##ptype,				    \
 	.expected_attach_type = atype,					    \
 	.cookie = (long)(flags),					    \
@@ -8683,61 +8677,167 @@ static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = {
 	SEC_DEF("sk_lookup",		SK_LOOKUP, BPF_SK_LOOKUP, SEC_ATTACHABLE | SEC_SLOPPY_PFX),
 };
 
-#define MAX_TYPE_NAME_SIZE 32
+static size_t custom_sec_def_cnt;
+static struct bpf_sec_def *custom_sec_defs;
+static struct bpf_sec_def custom_fallback_def;
+static bool has_custom_fallback_def;
 
-static const struct bpf_sec_def *find_sec_def(const char *sec_name)
+static int last_custom_sec_def_handler_id;
+
+int libbpf_register_prog_handler(const char *sec,
+				 enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
+				 enum bpf_attach_type exp_attach_type,
+				 const struct libbpf_prog_handler_opts *opts)
 {
-	const struct bpf_sec_def *sec_def;
-	enum sec_def_flags sec_flags;
-	int i, n = ARRAY_SIZE(section_defs), len;
-	bool strict = libbpf_mode & LIBBPF_STRICT_SEC_NAME;
+	struct bpf_sec_def *sec_def;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
-		sec_def = &section_defs[i];
-		sec_flags = sec_def->cookie;
-		len = strlen(sec_def->sec);
+	if (!OPTS_VALID(opts, libbpf_prog_handler_opts))
+		return libbpf_err(-EINVAL);
 
-		/* "type/" always has to have proper SEC("type/extras") form */
-		if (sec_def->sec[len - 1] == '/') {
-			if (str_has_pfx(sec_name, sec_def->sec))
-				return sec_def;
-			continue;
-		}
+	if (last_custom_sec_def_handler_id == INT_MAX) /* prevent overflow */
+		return libbpf_err(-E2BIG);
 
-		/* "type+" means it can be either exact SEC("type") or
-		 * well-formed SEC("type/extras") with proper '/' separator
-		 */
-		if (sec_def->sec[len - 1] == '+') {
-			len--;
-			/* not even a prefix */
-			if (strncmp(sec_name, sec_def->sec, len) != 0)
-				continue;
-			/* exact match or has '/' separator */
-			if (sec_name[len] == '\0' || sec_name[len] == '/')
-				return sec_def;
-			continue;
-		}
+	if (sec) {
+		sec_def = libbpf_reallocarray(custom_sec_defs, custom_sec_def_cnt + 1,
+					      sizeof(*sec_def));
+		if (!sec_def)
+			return libbpf_err(-ENOMEM);
 
-		/* SEC_SLOPPY_PFX definitions are allowed to be just prefix
-		 * matches, unless strict section name mode
-		 * (LIBBPF_STRICT_SEC_NAME) is enabled, in which case the
-		 * match has to be exact.
-		 */
-		if ((sec_flags & SEC_SLOPPY_PFX) && !strict)  {
-			if (str_has_pfx(sec_name, sec_def->sec))
-				return sec_def;
-			continue;
-		}
+		custom_sec_defs = sec_def;
+		sec_def = &custom_sec_defs[custom_sec_def_cnt];
+	} else {
+		if (has_custom_fallback_def)
+			return libbpf_err(-EBUSY);
 
-		/* Definitions not marked SEC_SLOPPY_PFX (e.g.,
-		 * SEC("syscall")) are exact matches in both modes.
-		 */
-		if (strcmp(sec_name, sec_def->sec) == 0)
+		sec_def = &custom_fallback_def;
+	}
+
+	sec_def->sec = sec ? strdup(sec) : NULL;
+	if (sec && !sec_def->sec)
+		return libbpf_err(-ENOMEM);
+
+	sec_def->prog_type = prog_type;
+	sec_def->expected_attach_type = exp_attach_type;
+	sec_def->cookie = OPTS_GET(opts, cookie, 0);
+
+	sec_def->prog_setup_fn = OPTS_GET(opts, prog_setup_fn, NULL);
+	sec_def->prog_prepare_load_fn = OPTS_GET(opts, prog_prepare_load_fn, NULL);
+	sec_def->prog_attach_fn = OPTS_GET(opts, prog_attach_fn, NULL);
+
+	sec_def->handler_id = ++last_custom_sec_def_handler_id;
+
+	if (sec)
+		custom_sec_def_cnt++;
+	else
+		has_custom_fallback_def = true;
+
+	return sec_def->handler_id;
+}
+
+int libbpf_unregister_prog_handler(int handler_id)
+{
+	struct bpf_sec_def *sec_defs;
+	int i;
+
+	if (handler_id <= 0)
+		return libbpf_err(-EINVAL);
+
+	if (has_custom_fallback_def && custom_fallback_def.handler_id == handler_id) {
+		memset(&custom_fallback_def, 0, sizeof(custom_fallback_def));
+		has_custom_fallback_def = false;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < custom_sec_def_cnt; i++) {
+		if (custom_sec_defs[i].handler_id == handler_id)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (i == custom_sec_def_cnt)
+		return libbpf_err(-ENOENT);
+
+	free(custom_sec_defs[i].sec);
+	for (i = i + 1; i < custom_sec_def_cnt; i++)
+		custom_sec_defs[i - 1] = custom_sec_defs[i];
+	custom_sec_def_cnt--;
+
+	/* try to shrink the array, but it's ok if we couldn't */
+	sec_defs = libbpf_reallocarray(custom_sec_defs, custom_sec_def_cnt, sizeof(*sec_defs));
+	if (sec_defs)
+		custom_sec_defs = sec_defs;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static bool sec_def_matches(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec_def, const char *sec_name,
+			    bool allow_sloppy)
+{
+	size_t len = strlen(sec_def->sec);
+
+	/* "type/" always has to have proper SEC("type/extras") form */
+	if (sec_def->sec[len - 1] == '/') {
+		if (str_has_pfx(sec_name, sec_def->sec))
+			return true;
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	/* "type+" means it can be either exact SEC("type") or
+	 * well-formed SEC("type/extras") with proper '/' separator
+	 */
+	if (sec_def->sec[len - 1] == '+') {
+		len--;
+		/* not even a prefix */
+		if (strncmp(sec_name, sec_def->sec, len) != 0)
+			return false;
+		/* exact match or has '/' separator */
+		if (sec_name[len] == '\0' || sec_name[len] == '/')
+			return true;
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	/* SEC_SLOPPY_PFX definitions are allowed to be just prefix
+	 * matches, unless strict section name mode
+	 * (LIBBPF_STRICT_SEC_NAME) is enabled, in which case the
+	 * match has to be exact.
+	 */
+	if (allow_sloppy && str_has_pfx(sec_name, sec_def->sec))
+		return true;
+
+	/* Definitions not marked SEC_SLOPPY_PFX (e.g.,
+	 * SEC("syscall")) are exact matches in both modes.
+	 */
+	return strcmp(sec_name, sec_def->sec) == 0;
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_sec_def *find_sec_def(const char *sec_name)
+{
+	const struct bpf_sec_def *sec_def;
+	int i, n;
+	bool strict = libbpf_mode & LIBBPF_STRICT_SEC_NAME, allow_sloppy;
+
+	n = custom_sec_def_cnt;
+	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+		sec_def = &custom_sec_defs[i];
+		if (sec_def_matches(sec_def, sec_name, false))
+			return sec_def;
+	}
+
+	n = ARRAY_SIZE(section_defs);
+	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+		sec_def = &section_defs[i];
+		allow_sloppy = (sec_def->cookie & SEC_SLOPPY_PFX) && !strict;
+		if (sec_def_matches(sec_def, sec_name, allow_sloppy))
 			return sec_def;
 	}
+
+	if (has_custom_fallback_def)
+		return &custom_fallback_def;
+
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+#define MAX_TYPE_NAME_SIZE 32
+
 static char *libbpf_get_type_names(bool attach_type)
 {
 	int i, len = ARRAY_SIZE(section_defs) * MAX_TYPE_NAME_SIZE;
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index c8d8daad212e..c1b0c2ef14d8 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -1328,6 +1328,115 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_linker__add_file(struct bpf_linker *linker,
 LIBBPF_API int bpf_linker__finalize(struct bpf_linker *linker);
 LIBBPF_API void bpf_linker__free(struct bpf_linker *linker);
 
+/*
+ * Custom handling of BPF program's SEC() definitions
+ */
+
+struct bpf_prog_load_opts; /* defined in bpf.h */
+
+/* Called during bpf_object__open() for each recognized BPF program. Callback
+ * can use various bpf_program__set_*() setters to adjust whatever properties
+ * are necessary.
+ */
+typedef int (*libbpf_prog_setup_fn_t)(struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie);
+
+/* Called right before libbpf performs bpf_prog_load() to load BPF program
+ * into the kernel. Callback can adjust opts as necessary.
+ */
+typedef int (*libbpf_prog_prepare_load_fn_t)(struct bpf_program *prog,
+					     struct bpf_prog_load_opts *opts, long cookie);
+
+/* Called during skeleton attach or through bpf_program__attach(). If
+ * auto-attach is not supported, callback should return 0 and set link to
+ * NULL (it's not considered an error during skeleton attach, but it will be
+ * an error for bpf_program__attach() calls). On error, error should be
+ * returned directly and link set to NULL. On success, return 0 and set link
+ * to a valid struct bpf_link.
+ */
+typedef int (*libbpf_prog_attach_fn_t)(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie,
+				       struct bpf_link **link);
+
+struct libbpf_prog_handler_opts {
+	/* size of this struct, for forward/backward compatiblity */
+	size_t sz;
+	/* User-provided value that is passed to prog_setup_fn,
+	 * prog_prepare_load_fn, and prog_attach_fn callbacks. Allows user to
+	 * register one set of callbacks for multiple SEC() definitions and
+	 * still be able to distinguish them, if necessary. For example,
+	 * libbpf itself is using this to pass necessary flags (e.g.,
+	 * sleepable flag) to a common internal SEC() handler.
+	 */
+	long cookie;
+	/* BPF program initialization callback (see libbpf_prog_setup_fn_t).
+	 * Callback is optional, pass NULL if it's not necessary.
+	 */
+	libbpf_prog_setup_fn_t prog_setup_fn;
+	/* BPF program loading callback (see libbpf_prog_prepare_load_fn_t).
+	 * Callback is optional, pass NULL if it's not necessary.
+	 */
+	libbpf_prog_prepare_load_fn_t prog_prepare_load_fn;
+	/* BPF program attach callback (see libbpf_prog_attach_fn_t).
+	 * Callback is optional, pass NULL if it's not necessary.
+	 */
+	libbpf_prog_attach_fn_t prog_attach_fn;
+};
+#define libbpf_prog_handler_opts__last_field prog_attach_fn
+
+/**
+ * @brief **libbpf_register_prog_handler()** registers a custom BPF program
+ * SEC() handler.
+ * @param sec section prefix for which custom handler is registered
+ * @param prog_type BPF program type associated with specified section
+ * @param exp_attach_type Expected BPF attach type associated with specified section
+ * @param opts optional cookie, callbacks, and other extra options
+ * @return Non-negative handler ID is returned on success. This handler ID has
+ * to be passed to *libbpf_unregister_prog_handler()* to unregister such
+ * custom handler. Negative error code is returned on error.
+ *
+ * *sec* defines which SEC() definitions are handled by this custom handler
+ * registration. *sec* can have few different forms:
+ *   - if *sec* is just a plain string (e.g., "abc"), it will match only
+ *   SEC("abc"). If BPF program specifies SEC("abc/whatever") it will result
+ *   in an error;
+ *   - if *sec* is of the form "abc/", proper SEC() form is
+ *   SEC("abc/something"), where acceptable "something" should be checked by
+ *   *prog_init_fn* callback, if there are additional restrictions;
+ *   - if *sec* is of the form "abc+", it will successfully match both
+ *   SEC("abc") and SEC("abc/whatever") forms;
+ *   - if *sec* is NULL, custom handler is registered for any BPF program that
+ *   doesn't match any of the registered (custom or libbpf's own) SEC()
+ *   handlers. There could be only one such generic custom handler registered
+ *   at any given time.
+ *
+ * All custom handlers (except the one with *sec* == NULL) are processed
+ * before libbpf's own SEC() handlers. It is allowed to "override" libbpf's
+ * SEC() handlers by registering custom ones for the same section prefix
+ * (i.e., it's possible to have custom SEC("perf_event/LLC-load-misses")
+ * handler).
+ *
+ * Note, like much of global libbpf APIs (e.g., libbpf_set_print(),
+ * libbpf_set_strict_mode(), etc)) these APIs are not thread-safe. User needs
+ * to ensure synchronization if there is a risk of running this API from
+ * multiple threads simultaneously.
+ */
+LIBBPF_API int libbpf_register_prog_handler(const char *sec,
+					    enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
+					    enum bpf_attach_type exp_attach_type,
+					    const struct libbpf_prog_handler_opts *opts);
+/**
+ * @brief *libbpf_unregister_prog_handler()* unregisters previously registered
+ * custom BPF program SEC() handler.
+ * @param handler_id handler ID returned by *libbpf_register_prog_handler()*
+ * after successful registration
+ * @return 0 on success, negative error code if handler isn't found
+ *
+ * Note, like much of global libbpf APIs (e.g., libbpf_set_print(),
+ * libbpf_set_strict_mode(), etc)) these APIs are not thread-safe. User needs
+ * to ensure synchronization if there is a risk of running this API from
+ * multiple threads simultaneously.
+ */
+LIBBPF_API int libbpf_unregister_prog_handler(int handler_id);
+
 #ifdef __cplusplus
 } /* extern "C" */
 #endif
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
index 47e70c9058d9..df1b947792c8 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
@@ -439,3 +439,9 @@ LIBBPF_0.7.0 {
 		libbpf_probe_bpf_prog_type;
 		libbpf_set_memlock_rlim_max;
 } LIBBPF_0.6.0;
+
+LIBBPF_0.8.0 {
+	global:
+		libbpf_register_prog_handler;
+		libbpf_unregister_prog_handler;
+} LIBBPF_0.7.0;
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h
index 0fefefc3500b..61f2039404b6 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h
@@ -4,6 +4,6 @@
 #define __LIBBPF_VERSION_H
 
 #define LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION 0
-#define LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION 7
+#define LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION 8
 
 #endif /* __LIBBPF_VERSION_H */
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add custom SEC() handling selftest
  2022-03-05  1:01 [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers Andrii Nakryiko
  2022-03-05  1:01 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 1/3] libbpf: allow BPF program auto-attach handlers to bail out Andrii Nakryiko
  2022-03-05  1:01 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2022-03-05  1:01 ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2022-03-05 17:50 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2022-03-05  1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf, ast, daniel; +Cc: andrii, kernel-team, Alan Maguire

Add a selftest validating various aspects of libbpf's handling of custom
SEC() handlers. It also demonstrates how libraries can ensure very early
callbacks registration and unregistration using
__attribute__((constructor))/__attribute__((destructor)) functions.

Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/custom_sec_handlers.c      | 176 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/test_custom_sec_handlers.c      |  63 +++++++
 2 files changed, 239 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/custom_sec_handlers.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_custom_sec_handlers.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/custom_sec_handlers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/custom_sec_handlers.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b2dfc5954aea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/custom_sec_handlers.c
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2022 Facebook */
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "test_custom_sec_handlers.skel.h"
+
+#define COOKIE_ABC1 1
+#define COOKIE_ABC2 2
+#define COOKIE_CUSTOM 3
+#define COOKIE_FALLBACK 4
+#define COOKIE_KPROBE 5
+
+static int custom_setup_prog(struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie)
+{
+	if (cookie == COOKIE_ABC1)
+		bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, false);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int custom_prepare_load_prog(struct bpf_program *prog,
+				    struct bpf_prog_load_opts *opts, long cookie)
+{
+	if (cookie == COOKIE_FALLBACK)
+		opts->prog_flags |= BPF_F_SLEEPABLE;
+	else if (cookie == COOKIE_ABC1)
+		ASSERT_FALSE(true, "unexpected preload for abc");
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int custom_attach_prog(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie,
+			      struct bpf_link **link)
+{
+	switch (cookie) {
+	case COOKIE_ABC2:
+		*link = bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint(prog, "sys_enter");
+		return libbpf_get_error(*link);
+	case COOKIE_CUSTOM:
+		*link = bpf_program__attach_tracepoint(prog, "syscalls", "sys_enter_nanosleep");
+		return libbpf_get_error(*link);
+	case COOKIE_KPROBE:
+	case COOKIE_FALLBACK:
+		/* no auto-attach for SEC("xyz") and SEC("kprobe") */
+		*link = NULL;
+		return 0;
+	default:
+		ASSERT_FALSE(true, "unexpected cookie");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+}
+
+static int abc1_id;
+static int abc2_id;
+static int custom_id;
+static int fallback_id;
+static int kprobe_id;
+
+__attribute__((constructor))
+static void register_sec_handlers(void)
+{
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(libbpf_prog_handler_opts, abc1_opts,
+		.cookie = COOKIE_ABC1,
+		.prog_setup_fn = custom_setup_prog,
+		.prog_prepare_load_fn = custom_prepare_load_prog,
+		.prog_attach_fn = NULL,
+	);
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(libbpf_prog_handler_opts, abc2_opts,
+		.cookie = COOKIE_ABC2,
+		.prog_setup_fn = custom_setup_prog,
+		.prog_prepare_load_fn = custom_prepare_load_prog,
+		.prog_attach_fn = custom_attach_prog,
+	);
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(libbpf_prog_handler_opts, custom_opts,
+		.cookie = COOKIE_CUSTOM,
+		.prog_setup_fn = NULL,
+		.prog_prepare_load_fn = NULL,
+		.prog_attach_fn = custom_attach_prog,
+	);
+
+	abc1_id = libbpf_register_prog_handler("abc", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, 0, &abc1_opts);
+	abc2_id = libbpf_register_prog_handler("abc/", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, 0, &abc2_opts);
+	custom_id = libbpf_register_prog_handler("custom+", BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, 0, &custom_opts);
+}
+
+__attribute__((destructor))
+static void unregister_sec_handlers(void)
+{
+	libbpf_unregister_prog_handler(abc1_id);
+	libbpf_unregister_prog_handler(abc2_id);
+	libbpf_unregister_prog_handler(custom_id);
+}
+
+void test_custom_sec_handlers(void)
+{
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(libbpf_prog_handler_opts, opts,
+		.prog_setup_fn = custom_setup_prog,
+		.prog_prepare_load_fn = custom_prepare_load_prog,
+		.prog_attach_fn = custom_attach_prog,
+	);
+	struct test_custom_sec_handlers* skel;
+	int err;
+
+	ASSERT_GT(abc1_id, 0, "abc1_id");
+	ASSERT_GT(abc2_id, 0, "abc2_id");
+	ASSERT_GT(custom_id, 0, "custom_id");
+
+	/* override libbpf's handle of SEC("kprobe/...") but also allow pure
+	 * SEC("kprobe") due to "kprobe+" specifier. Register it as
+	 * TRACEPOINT, just for fun.
+	 */
+	opts.cookie = COOKIE_KPROBE;
+	kprobe_id = libbpf_register_prog_handler("kprobe+", BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, 0, &opts);
+	/* fallback treats everything as BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL program to test
+	 * setting custom BPF_F_SLEEPABLE bit in preload handler
+	 */
+	opts.cookie = COOKIE_FALLBACK;
+	fallback_id = libbpf_register_prog_handler(NULL, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, 0, &opts);
+
+	if (!ASSERT_GT(fallback_id, 0, "fallback_id") /* || !ASSERT_GT(kprobe_id, 0, "kprobe_id")*/) {
+		if (fallback_id > 0)
+			libbpf_unregister_prog_handler(fallback_id);
+		if (kprobe_id > 0)
+			libbpf_unregister_prog_handler(kprobe_id);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/* open skeleton and validate assumptions */
+	skel = test_custom_sec_handlers__open();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(bpf_program__type(skel->progs.abc1), BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, "abc1_type");
+	ASSERT_FALSE(bpf_program__autoload(skel->progs.abc1), "abc1_autoload");
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(bpf_program__type(skel->progs.abc2), BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, "abc2_type");
+	ASSERT_EQ(bpf_program__type(skel->progs.custom1), BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, "custom1_type");
+	ASSERT_EQ(bpf_program__type(skel->progs.custom2), BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, "custom2_type");
+	ASSERT_EQ(bpf_program__type(skel->progs.kprobe1), BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, "kprobe1_type");
+	ASSERT_EQ(bpf_program__type(skel->progs.xyz), BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, "xyz_type");
+
+	skel->rodata->my_pid = getpid();
+
+	/* now attempt to load everything */
+	err = test_custom_sec_handlers__load(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_load"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* now try to auto-attach everything */
+	err = test_custom_sec_handlers__attach(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	skel->links.xyz = bpf_program__attach(skel->progs.kprobe1);
+	ASSERT_EQ(errno, EOPNOTSUPP, "xyz_attach_err");
+	ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel->links.xyz, "xyz_attach");
+
+	/* trigger programs */
+	usleep(1);
+
+	/* SEC("abc") is set to not auto-loaded */
+	ASSERT_FALSE(skel->bss->abc1_called, "abc1_called");
+	ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->abc2_called, "abc2_called");
+	ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->custom1_called, "custom1_called");
+	ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->custom2_called, "custom2_called");
+	/* SEC("kprobe") shouldn't be auto-attached */
+	ASSERT_FALSE(skel->bss->kprobe1_called, "kprobe1_called");
+	/* SEC("xyz") shouldn't be auto-attached */
+	ASSERT_FALSE(skel->bss->xyz_called, "xyz_called");
+
+cleanup:
+	test_custom_sec_handlers__destroy(skel);
+
+	ASSERT_OK(libbpf_unregister_prog_handler(fallback_id), "unregister_fallback");
+	ASSERT_OK(libbpf_unregister_prog_handler(kprobe_id), "unregister_kprobe");
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_custom_sec_handlers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_custom_sec_handlers.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4061f701ca50
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_custom_sec_handlers.c
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2022 Facebook */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+const volatile int my_pid;
+
+bool abc1_called;
+bool abc2_called;
+bool custom1_called;
+bool custom2_called;
+bool kprobe1_called;
+bool xyz_called;
+
+SEC("abc")
+int abc1(void *ctx)
+{
+	abc1_called = true;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("abc/whatever")
+int abc2(void *ctx)
+{
+	abc2_called = true;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("custom")
+int custom1(void *ctx)
+{
+	custom1_called = true;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("custom/something")
+int custom2(void *ctx)
+{
+	custom2_called = true;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("kprobe")
+int kprobe1(void *ctx)
+{
+	kprobe1_called = true;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("xyz/blah")
+int xyz(void *ctx)
+{
+	int whatever;
+
+	/* use sleepable helper, custom handler should set sleepable flag */
+	bpf_copy_from_user(&whatever, sizeof(whatever), NULL);
+	xyz_called = true;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers
  2022-03-05  1:01 [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers Andrii Nakryiko
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-03-05  1:01 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add custom SEC() handling selftest Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2022-03-05 17:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2022-03-05 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrii Nakryiko; +Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, kernel-team, alan.maguire

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 17:01:26 -0800 you wrote:
> Add ability for user applications and libraries to register custom BPF program
> SEC() handlers. See patch #2 for examples where this is useful.
> 
> Patch #1 does some preliminary refactoring to allow exponsing program
> init, preload, and attach callbacks as public API. It also establishes
> a protocol to allow optional auto-attach behavior. This will also help the
> case of sometimes auto-attachable uprobes.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v5,bpf-next,1/3] libbpf: allow BPF program auto-attach handlers to bail out
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4fa5bcfe07f7
  - [v5,bpf-next,2/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/697f104db8a6
  - [v5,bpf-next,3/3] selftests/bpf: add custom SEC() handling selftest
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/aa963bcb0adc

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-05 17:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-05  1:01 [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers Andrii Nakryiko
2022-03-05  1:01 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 1/3] libbpf: allow BPF program auto-attach handlers to bail out Andrii Nakryiko
2022-03-05  1:01 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers Andrii Nakryiko
2022-03-05  1:01 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add custom SEC() handling selftest Andrii Nakryiko
2022-03-05 17:50 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: support custom SEC() handlers patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).