bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 9/9] bpf: bpftool: Remove useless rlimit setting
Date: Sun,  3 Apr 2022 14:43:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220403144300.6707-10-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220403144300.6707-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>

As we have already set LIBBPF_STRICT_AUTO_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, we don't need to
bump RLIMIT_MEMLOCK any more.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c     | 7 -------
 tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c    | 2 --
 tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h       | 2 --
 tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c        | 2 --
 tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c       | 1 -
 tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c       | 3 ---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c | 2 --
 7 files changed, 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
index 0c1e06cf50b9..6b1e67851690 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
@@ -119,13 +119,6 @@ static bool is_bpffs(char *path)
 	return (unsigned long)st_fs.f_type == BPF_FS_MAGIC;
 }
 
-void set_max_rlimit(void)
-{
-	struct rlimit rinf = { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY };
-
-	setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rinf);
-}
-
 static int
 mnt_fs(const char *target, const char *type, char *buff, size_t bufflen)
 {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
index 290998c82de1..19c484e63da4 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
@@ -1136,8 +1136,6 @@ static int do_probe(int argc, char **argv)
 	__u32 ifindex = 0;
 	char *ifname;
 
-	set_max_rlimit();
-
 	while (argc) {
 		if (is_prefix(*argv, "kernel")) {
 			if (target != COMPONENT_UNSPEC) {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
index 6e9277ffc68c..aa99ffab451a 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
@@ -102,8 +102,6 @@ int detect_common_prefix(const char *arg, ...);
 void fprint_hex(FILE *f, void *arg, unsigned int n, const char *sep);
 void usage(void) __noreturn;
 
-void set_max_rlimit(void);
-
 int mount_tracefs(const char *target);
 
 struct obj_ref {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
index c26378f20831..877387ef79c7 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
@@ -1342,8 +1342,6 @@ static int do_create(int argc, char **argv)
 		goto exit;
 	}
 
-	set_max_rlimit();
-
 	fd = bpf_map_create(map_type, map_name, key_size, value_size, max_entries, &attr);
 	if (fd < 0) {
 		p_err("map create failed: %s", strerror(errno));
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
index bb6c969a114a..e2d00d3cd868 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
@@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ int build_obj_refs_table(struct hashmap **map, enum bpf_obj_type type)
 		p_err("failed to create hashmap for PID references");
 		return -1;
 	}
-	set_max_rlimit();
 
 	skel = pid_iter_bpf__open();
 	if (!skel) {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
index bc4e05542c2b..d5ba3b6f30ae 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
@@ -1603,8 +1603,6 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
 		}
 	}
 
-	set_max_rlimit();
-
 	if (verifier_logs)
 		/* log_level1 + log_level2 + stats, but not stable UAPI */
 		open_opts.kernel_log_level = 1 + 2 + 4;
@@ -2302,7 +2300,6 @@ static int do_profile(int argc, char **argv)
 		}
 	}
 
-	set_max_rlimit();
 	err = profiler_bpf__load(profile_obj);
 	if (err) {
 		p_err("failed to load profile_obj");
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
index e08a6ff2866c..2535f079ed67 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
@@ -501,8 +501,6 @@ static int do_register(int argc, char **argv)
 	if (libbpf_get_error(obj))
 		return -1;
 
-	set_max_rlimit();
-
 	if (bpf_object__load(obj)) {
 		bpf_object__close(obj);
 		return -1;
-- 
2.17.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-03 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-03 14:42 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/9] bpf: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK cleanups Yafang Shao
2022-04-03 14:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/9] bpf: selftests: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode in bpf constructor Yafang Shao
2022-04-04  1:24   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-04-04  1:26     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-04-04  6:45       ` Yafang Shao
2022-04-04  6:44     ` Yafang Shao
2022-04-03 14:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/9] bpf: selftests: Use bpf strict all ctor in xdping Yafang Shao
2022-04-04  1:26   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-04-04  6:46     ` Yafang Shao
2022-04-03 14:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/9] bpf: selftests: Use bpf strict all ctor in xdpxceiver Yafang Shao
2022-04-03 14:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/9] bpf: samples: Replace RLIMIT_MEMLOCK with LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL in xdpsock_user Yafang Shao
2022-04-03 14:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/9] bpf: samples: Replace RLIMIT_MEMLOCK with LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL in xsk_fwd Yafang Shao
2022-04-03 14:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/9] bpf: runqslower: Replace RLIMIT_MEMLOCK with LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL Yafang Shao
2022-04-03 14:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/9] bpf: bpftool: Remove useless return value of libbpf_set_strict_mode Yafang Shao
2022-04-03 14:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/9] bpf: bpftool: Set LIBBPF_STRICT_AUTO_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK for legacy libbpf Yafang Shao
2022-04-03 14:43 ` Yafang Shao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220403144300.6707-10-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).