[PATCH bpf-next v2 1/9] bpf: selftests: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode in bpf constructor

[Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>]

In libbpf 1.0 API mode, it will bump rlimit automatically if there's no
memcg-basaed accounting, so we can use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead in case
we want to run it in an old kernel.

The constructor is renamed to bpf_strict_all_ctor().

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h | 26 +++---------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h
index 9dac9b30f8ef..d050f7d0bb5c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h
@@ -1,28 +1,8 @@
 #include <sys/resource.h>
 #include <stdio.h>
 
-static  __attribute__((constructor)) void bpf_rlimit_ctor(void)
+static  __attribute__((constructor)) void bpf_strict_all_ctor(void)
 {
-	struct rlimit rlim_old, rlim_new = {
-		.rlim_cur	= RLIM_INFINITY,
-		.rlim_max	= RLIM_INFINITY,
-	};
-
-	getrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_old);
-	/* For the sake of running the test cases, we temporarily
-	 * set rlimit to infinity in order for kernel to focus on
-	 * errors from actual test cases and not getting noise
-	 * from hitting memlock limits. The limit is on per-process
-	 * basis and not a global one, hence destructor not really
-	 * needed here.
-	 */
-	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_new) < 0) {
-		perror("Unable to lift memlock rlimit");
-		/* Trying out lower limit, but expect potential test
-		 * case failures from this!
-		 */
-		rlim_new.rlim_cur = rlim_old.rlim_cur + (1UL << 20);
-		rlim_new.rlim_max = rlim_old.rlim_max + (1UL << 20);
-		setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rlim_new);
-	}
+	/* Use libbpf 1.0 API mode */
+	libbpf_set_strict_mode(LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL);
 }
-- 
2.17.1