From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/13] bpf: Adapt copy_map_value for multiple offset case
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:02:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220409093303.499196-8-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220409093303.499196-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Since now there might be at most 10 offsets that need handling in
copy_map_value, the manual shuffling and special case is no longer going
to work. Hence, let's generalise the copy_map_value function by using
a sorted array of offsets to skip regions that must be avoided while
copying into and out of a map value.
When the map is created, we populate the offset array in struct map,
with one extra element for map->value_size, which is used as the final
offset to subtract previous offset from. Then, copy_map_value uses this
sorted offset array is used to memcpy while skipping timer, spin lock,
and kptr.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 56 +++++++++++++++-------------
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index e9791ecafa5d..bd79132c664d 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ struct bpf_map_ops {
enum {
/* Support at most 8 pointers in a BPF map value */
BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_MAX = 8,
+ BPF_MAP_OFF_ARR_MAX = BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_MAX +
+ 1 + /* for bpf_spin_lock */
+ 1, /* for bpf_timer */
};
enum {
@@ -176,6 +179,12 @@ struct bpf_map_value_off {
struct bpf_map_value_off_desc off[];
};
+struct bpf_map_off_arr {
+ u32 cnt;
+ u32 field_off[BPF_MAP_OFF_ARR_MAX];
+ u8 field_sz[BPF_MAP_OFF_ARR_MAX];
+};
+
struct bpf_map {
/* The first two cachelines with read-mostly members of which some
* are also accessed in fast-path (e.g. ops, max_entries).
@@ -204,10 +213,7 @@ struct bpf_map {
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
#endif
char name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN];
- bool bypass_spec_v1;
- bool frozen; /* write-once; write-protected by freeze_mutex */
- /* 6 bytes hole */
-
+ struct bpf_map_off_arr *off_arr;
/* The 3rd and 4th cacheline with misc members to avoid false sharing
* particularly with refcounting.
*/
@@ -227,6 +233,8 @@ struct bpf_map {
bool jited;
bool xdp_has_frags;
} owner;
+ bool bypass_spec_v1;
+ bool frozen; /* write-once; write-protected by freeze_mutex */
};
static inline bool map_value_has_spin_lock(const struct bpf_map *map)
@@ -250,37 +258,33 @@ static inline void check_and_init_map_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *dst)
memset(dst + map->spin_lock_off, 0, sizeof(struct bpf_spin_lock));
if (unlikely(map_value_has_timer(map)))
memset(dst + map->timer_off, 0, sizeof(struct bpf_timer));
+ if (unlikely(map_value_has_kptrs(map))) {
+ struct bpf_map_value_off *tab = map->kptr_off_tab;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < tab->nr_off; i++)
+ *(u64 *)(dst + tab->off[i].offset) = 0;
+ }
}
/* copy everything but bpf_spin_lock and bpf_timer. There could be one of each. */
static inline void copy_map_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *dst, void *src)
{
- u32 s_off = 0, s_sz = 0, t_off = 0, t_sz = 0;
+ u32 curr_off = 0;
+ int i;
- if (unlikely(map_value_has_spin_lock(map))) {
- s_off = map->spin_lock_off;
- s_sz = sizeof(struct bpf_spin_lock);
- }
- if (unlikely(map_value_has_timer(map))) {
- t_off = map->timer_off;
- t_sz = sizeof(struct bpf_timer);
+ if (likely(!map->off_arr)) {
+ memcpy(dst, src, map->value_size);
+ return;
}
- if (unlikely(s_sz || t_sz)) {
- if (s_off < t_off || !s_sz) {
- swap(s_off, t_off);
- swap(s_sz, t_sz);
- }
- memcpy(dst, src, t_off);
- memcpy(dst + t_off + t_sz,
- src + t_off + t_sz,
- s_off - t_off - t_sz);
- memcpy(dst + s_off + s_sz,
- src + s_off + s_sz,
- map->value_size - s_off - s_sz);
- } else {
- memcpy(dst, src, map->value_size);
+ for (i = 0; i < map->off_arr->cnt; i++) {
+ u32 next_off = map->off_arr->field_off[i];
+
+ memcpy(dst + curr_off, src + curr_off, next_off - curr_off);
+ curr_off += map->off_arr->field_sz[i];
}
+ memcpy(dst + curr_off, src + curr_off, map->value_size - curr_off);
}
void copy_map_value_locked(struct bpf_map *map, void *dst, void *src,
bool lock_src);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index edfe691284b0..481d5bb06203 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include <linux/pgtable.h>
#include <linux/bpf_lsm.h>
#include <linux/poll.h>
+#include <linux/sort.h>
#include <linux/bpf-netns.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h>
#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
@@ -562,6 +563,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work);
security_bpf_map_free(map);
+ kfree(map->off_arr);
bpf_map_free_kptr_off_tab(map);
bpf_map_release_memcg(map);
/* implementation dependent freeing */
@@ -851,6 +853,84 @@ int map_check_no_btf(const struct bpf_map *map,
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
+static int map_off_arr_cmp(const void *_a, const void *_b, const void *priv)
+{
+ const u32 a = *(const u32 *)_a;
+ const u32 b = *(const u32 *)_b;
+
+ if (a < b)
+ return -1;
+ else if (a > b)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void map_off_arr_swap(void *_a, void *_b, int size, const void *priv)
+{
+ struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *)priv;
+ u32 *off_base = map->off_arr->field_off;
+ u32 *a = _a, *b = _b;
+ u8 *sz_a, *sz_b;
+
+ sz_a = map->off_arr->field_sz + (a - off_base);
+ sz_b = map->off_arr->field_sz + (b - off_base);
+
+ swap(*a, *b);
+ swap(*sz_a, *sz_b);
+}
+
+static int bpf_map_alloc_off_arr(struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+ bool has_spin_lock = map_value_has_spin_lock(map);
+ bool has_timer = map_value_has_timer(map);
+ bool has_kptrs = map_value_has_kptrs(map);
+ struct bpf_map_off_arr *off_arr;
+ u32 i;
+
+ if (!has_spin_lock && !has_timer && !has_kptrs) {
+ map->off_arr = NULL;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ off_arr = kmalloc(sizeof(*map->off_arr), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ if (!off_arr)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ map->off_arr = off_arr;
+
+ off_arr->cnt = 0;
+ if (has_spin_lock) {
+ i = off_arr->cnt;
+
+ off_arr->field_off[i] = map->spin_lock_off;
+ off_arr->field_sz[i] = sizeof(struct bpf_spin_lock);
+ off_arr->cnt++;
+ }
+ if (has_timer) {
+ i = off_arr->cnt;
+
+ off_arr->field_off[i] = map->timer_off;
+ off_arr->field_sz[i] = sizeof(struct bpf_timer);
+ off_arr->cnt++;
+ }
+ if (has_kptrs) {
+ struct bpf_map_value_off *tab = map->kptr_off_tab;
+ u32 *off = &off_arr->field_off[off_arr->cnt];
+ u8 *sz = &off_arr->field_sz[off_arr->cnt];
+
+ for (i = 0; i < tab->nr_off; i++) {
+ *off++ = tab->off[i].offset;
+ *sz++ = sizeof(u64);
+ }
+ off_arr->cnt += tab->nr_off;
+ }
+
+ if (off_arr->cnt == 1)
+ return 0;
+ sort_r(off_arr->field_off, off_arr->cnt, sizeof(off_arr->field_off[0]),
+ map_off_arr_cmp, map_off_arr_swap, map);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int map_check_btf(struct bpf_map *map, const struct btf *btf,
u32 btf_key_id, u32 btf_value_id)
{
@@ -1020,10 +1100,14 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id;
}
- err = security_bpf_map_alloc(map);
+ err = bpf_map_alloc_off_arr(map);
if (err)
goto free_map;
+ err = security_bpf_map_alloc(map);
+ if (err)
+ goto free_map_off_arr;
+
err = bpf_map_alloc_id(map);
if (err)
goto free_map_sec;
@@ -1046,6 +1130,8 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
free_map_sec:
security_bpf_map_free(map);
+free_map_off_arr:
+ kfree(map->off_arr);
free_map:
btf_put(map->btf);
map->ops->map_free(map);
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-09 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-09 9:32 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/13] Introduce typed pointer support in BPF maps Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-09 9:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/13] bpf: Make btf_find_field more generic Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-11 20:20 ` Joanne Koong
2022-04-12 19:48 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-09 9:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/13] bpf: Move check_ptr_off_reg before check_map_access Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-11 20:28 ` Joanne Koong
2022-04-09 9:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/13] bpf: Allow storing unreferenced kptr in map Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-12 0:32 ` Joanne Koong
2022-04-12 19:16 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-12 23:56 ` Joanne Koong
2022-04-13 5:50 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-13 5:41 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-09 9:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/13] bpf: Tag argument to be released in bpf_func_proto Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-12 18:16 ` Joanne Koong
2022-04-12 20:11 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-13 18:33 ` Joanne Koong
2022-04-13 18:39 ` Joanne Koong
2022-04-09 9:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/13] bpf: Allow storing referenced kptr in map Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-12 23:05 ` Joanne Koong
2022-04-13 5:36 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-13 5:54 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-09 9:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/13] bpf: Prevent escaping of kptr loaded from maps Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-09 9:32 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2022-04-09 9:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/13] bpf: Populate pairs of btf_id and destructor kfunc in btf Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-09 9:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/13] bpf: Wire up freeing of referenced kptr Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-09 9:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/13] bpf: Teach verifier about kptr_get kfunc helpers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-09 9:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/13] libbpf: Add kptr type tag macros to bpf_helpers.h Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-09 9:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for kptr Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-04-09 9:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/13] selftests/bpf: Add verifier " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220409093303.499196-8-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox