BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpftool: Add btf enum64 support
Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 12:00:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220501190028.2579037-1-yhs@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220501190002.2576452-1-yhs@fb.com>

Add BTF_KIND_ENUM64 support.
For example, the following enum is defined in uapi bpf.h.
  $ cat core.c
  enum A {
        BPF_F_INDEX_MASK                = 0xffffffffULL,
        BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU               = BPF_F_INDEX_MASK,
        BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK               = (0xfffffULL << 32),
  } g;
Compiled with
  clang -target bpf -O2 -g -c core.c
Using bpftool to dump types and generate format C file:
  $ bpftool btf dump file core.o
  ...
  [1] ENUM64 'A' size=8 vlen=3
        'BPF_F_INDEX_MASK' val=4294967295ULL
        'BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU' val=4294967295ULL
        'BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK' val=4503595332403200ULL
  $ bpftool btf dump file core.o format c
  ...
  enum A {
        BPF_F_INDEX_MASK = 4294967295ULL,
        BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU = 4294967295ULL,
        BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK = 4503595332403200ULL,
  };
  ...

The 64bit value is represented properly in BTF and C dump.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c        | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c        |  1 +
 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
index a2c665beda87..ae3c413fa3b1 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static const char * const btf_kind_str[NR_BTF_KINDS] = {
 	[BTF_KIND_FLOAT]	= "FLOAT",
 	[BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG]	= "DECL_TAG",
 	[BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG]	= "TYPE_TAG",
+	[BTF_KIND_ENUM64]	= "ENUM64",
 };
 
 struct btf_attach_point {
@@ -228,10 +229,52 @@ static int dump_btf_type(const struct btf *btf, __u32 id,
 			if (json_output) {
 				jsonw_start_object(w);
 				jsonw_string_field(w, "name", name);
-				jsonw_uint_field(w, "val", v->val);
+				if (btf_kflag(t))
+					jsonw_uint_field(w, "val", v->val);
+				else
+					jsonw_int_field(w, "val", v->val);
 				jsonw_end_object(w);
 			} else {
-				printf("\n\t'%s' val=%u", name, v->val);
+				if (btf_kflag(t))
+					printf("\n\t'%s' val=%u", name, v->val);
+				else
+					printf("\n\t'%s' val=%d", name, v->val);
+			}
+		}
+		if (json_output)
+			jsonw_end_array(w);
+		break;
+	}
+	case BTF_KIND_ENUM64: {
+		const struct btf_enum64 *v = (const void *)(t + 1);
+		__u16 vlen = BTF_INFO_VLEN(t->info);
+		int i;
+
+		if (json_output) {
+			jsonw_uint_field(w, "size", t->size);
+			jsonw_uint_field(w, "vlen", vlen);
+			jsonw_name(w, "values");
+			jsonw_start_array(w);
+		} else {
+			printf(" size=%u vlen=%u", t->size, vlen);
+		}
+		for (i = 0; i < vlen; i++, v++) {
+			const char *name = btf_str(btf, v->name_off);
+			__u64 val = (__u64)v->hi32 << 32 | v->lo32;
+
+			if (json_output) {
+				jsonw_start_object(w);
+				jsonw_string_field(w, "name", name);
+				if (btf_kflag(t))
+					jsonw_uint_field(w, "val", val);
+				else
+					jsonw_int_field(w, "val", val);
+				jsonw_end_object(w);
+			} else {
+				if (btf_kflag(t))
+					printf("\n\t'%s' val=%lluULL", name, val);
+				else
+					printf("\n\t'%s' val=%lldLL", name, val);
 			}
 		}
 		if (json_output)
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c
index f5dddf8ef404..f9f38384b9a6 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c
@@ -182,6 +182,35 @@ static int btf_dumper_enum(const struct btf_dumper *d,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int btf_dumper_enum64(const struct btf_dumper *d,
+			     const struct btf_type *t,
+			     const void *data)
+{
+	const struct btf_enum64 *enums = btf_enum64(t);
+	__u32 hi32, lo32;
+	__u64 value;
+	__u16 i;
+
+	if (t->size != 8)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	value = *(__u64 *)data;
+	hi32 = value >> 32;
+	lo32 = (__u32)value;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < btf_vlen(t); i++) {
+		if (hi32 == enums[i].hi32 && lo32 == enums[i].lo32) {
+			jsonw_string(d->jw,
+				     btf__name_by_offset(d->btf,
+							 enums[i].name_off));
+			return 0;
+		}
+	}
+
+	jsonw_int(d->jw, value);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static bool is_str_array(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_array *arr,
 			 const char *s)
 {
@@ -542,6 +571,8 @@ static int btf_dumper_do_type(const struct btf_dumper *d, __u32 type_id,
 		return btf_dumper_array(d, type_id, data);
 	case BTF_KIND_ENUM:
 		return btf_dumper_enum(d, t, data);
+	case BTF_KIND_ENUM64:
+		return btf_dumper_enum64(d, t, data);
 	case BTF_KIND_PTR:
 		btf_dumper_ptr(d, t, data);
 		return 0;
@@ -618,6 +649,7 @@ static int __btf_dumper_type_only(const struct btf *btf, __u32 type_id,
 			      btf__name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off));
 		break;
 	case BTF_KIND_ENUM:
+	case BTF_KIND_ENUM64:
 		BTF_PRINT_ARG("enum %s ",
 			      btf__name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off));
 		break;
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c
index 7678af364793..b80c3577057f 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c
@@ -1746,6 +1746,7 @@ btfgen_mark_type(struct btfgen_info *info, unsigned int type_id, bool follow_poi
 	case BTF_KIND_INT:
 	case BTF_KIND_FLOAT:
 	case BTF_KIND_ENUM:
+	case BTF_KIND_ENUM64:
 	case BTF_KIND_STRUCT:
 	case BTF_KIND_UNION:
 		break;
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-01 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-01 19:00 [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Add 64bit enum value support Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/12] bpf: Add btf enum64 support Yonghong Song
2022-05-09  0:33   ` Dave Marchevsky
2022-05-09 22:29   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:06     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-10 23:18       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-11  0:17         ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] libbpf: Permit 64bit relocation value Yonghong Song
2022-05-09  1:06   ` Dave Marchevsky
2022-05-10 19:35     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-09 22:37   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:14     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-10 23:19       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/12] libbpf: Fix an error in 64bit relocation value computation Yonghong Song
2022-05-09  0:55   ` Dave Marchevsky
2022-05-09  0:56     ` Dave Marchevsky
2022-05-09 22:37   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:11     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/12] libbpf: Add btf enum64 support Yonghong Song
2022-05-03 17:22   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-05 22:44     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-09 23:25   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:40     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-10 23:02       ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-10 23:40         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 23:38       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-11  0:39         ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-11 17:43           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-11 18:56             ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2022-05-09 23:31   ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpftool: " Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:43     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/12] selftests/bpf: Fix selftests failure Yonghong Song
2022-05-09  2:21   ` Dave Marchevsky
2022-05-10 19:40     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-09 23:34   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:44     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/12] selftests/bpf: Test new libbpf enum32/enum64 API functions Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/12] selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_ENUM64 unit tests Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Test BTF_KIND_ENUM64 for deduplication Yonghong Song
2022-05-09 23:37   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:44     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: add a test for enum64 value relocation Yonghong Song
2022-05-09 23:38   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-10 22:45     ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Clarify llvm dependency with possible selftest failures Yonghong Song
2022-05-01 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/12] docs/bpf: Update documentation for BTF_KIND_ENUM64 support Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220501190028.2579037-1-yhs@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox