From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 14/17] selftests/bpf: Add BTF_KIND_ENUM64 unit tests
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 23:27:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220607062708.3724845-1-yhs@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220607062554.3716237-1-yhs@fb.com>
Add unit tests for basic BTF_KIND_ENUM64 encoding.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
index 8e068e06b3e8..a986ee56c5f7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
@@ -4052,6 +4052,42 @@ static struct btf_raw_test raw_tests[] = {
.btf_load_err = true,
.err_str = "Type tags don't precede modifiers",
},
+{
+ .descr = "enum64 test #1, unsigned, size 8",
+ .raw_types = {
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_TBD, BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 0, 2), 8), /* [2] */
+ BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_TBD, 0, 0),
+ BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_TBD, 1, 1),
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0a\0b\0c"),
+ .map_type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY,
+ .map_name = "tag_type_check_btf",
+ .key_size = sizeof(int),
+ .value_size = 8,
+ .key_type_id = 1,
+ .value_type_id = 2,
+ .max_entries = 1,
+},
+{
+ .descr = "enum64 test #2, signed, size 4",
+ .raw_types = {
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_TBD, BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 1, 2), 4), /* [2] */
+ BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_TBD, -1, 0),
+ BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_TBD, 1, 0),
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0a\0b\0c"),
+ .map_type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY,
+ .map_name = "tag_type_check_btf",
+ .key_size = sizeof(int),
+ .value_size = 4,
+ .key_type_id = 1,
+ .value_type_id = 2,
+ .max_entries = 1,
+},
}; /* struct btf_raw_test raw_tests[] */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.h
index 128989bed8b7..38782bd47fdc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#define BTF_MEMBER_ENC(name, type, bits_offset) \
(name), (type), (bits_offset)
#define BTF_ENUM_ENC(name, val) (name), (val)
+#define BTF_ENUM64_ENC(name, val_lo32, val_hi32) (name), (val_lo32), (val_hi32)
#define BTF_MEMBER_OFFSET(bitfield_size, bits_offset) \
((bitfield_size) << 24 | (bits_offset))
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-07 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-07 6:25 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/17] bpf: Add 64bit enum value support Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/17] bpf: Add btf enum64 support Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/17] libbpf: Permit 64bit relocation value Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/17] libbpf: Fix an error in 64bit relocation value computation Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/17] libbpf: Refactor btf__add_enum() for future code sharing Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/17] libbpf: Add enum64 parsing and new enum64 public API Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/17] libbpf: Add enum64 deduplication support Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/17] libbpf: Add enum64 support for btf_dump Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/17] libbpf: Add enum64 sanitization Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/17] libbpf: Add enum64 support for bpf linking Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/17] libbpf: Add enum64 relocation support Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/17] bpftool: Add btf enum64 support Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/17] selftests/bpf: Fix selftests failure Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 13/17] selftests/bpf: Test new enum kflag and enum64 API functions Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:27 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2022-06-07 6:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/17] selftests/bpf: Test BTF_KIND_ENUM64 for deduplication Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 16/17] selftests/bpf: Add a test for enum64 value relocations Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 6:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 17/17] docs/bpf: Update documentation for BTF_KIND_ENUM64 support Yonghong Song
2022-06-07 17:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/17] bpf: Add 64bit enum value support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220607062708.3724845-1-yhs@fb.com \
--to=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox