BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 02/14] bpf: net: Avoid sock_setsockopt() taking sk lock when called from bpf
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 23:09:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220727060909.2371812-1-kafai@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220727060856.2370358-1-kafai@fb.com>

Most of the codes in bpf_setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET) are duplicated from
the sock_setsockopt().  The number of supported options are
increasing ever and so as the duplicated codes.

One issue in reusing sock_setsockopt() is that the bpf prog
has already acquired the sk lock.  sockptr_t is useful to handle this.
sockptr_t already has a bit 'is_kernel' to handle the kernel-or-user
memory copy.  This patch adds a 'is_bpf' bit to tell if sk locking
has already been ensured by the bpf prog.

{lock,release}_sock_sockopt() helpers are added for the
sock_setsockopt() to use.  These helpers will handle the new
'is_bpf' bit.

Note on the change in sock_setbindtodevice().  lock_sock_sockopt()
is done in sock_setbindtodevice() instead of doing the lock_sock
in sock_bindtoindex(..., lock_sk = true).

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
---
 include/linux/sockptr.h |  8 +++++++-
 include/net/sock.h      | 12 ++++++++++++
 net/core/sock.c         |  8 +++++---
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sockptr.h b/include/linux/sockptr.h
index d45902fb4cad..787d0be08fb7 100644
--- a/include/linux/sockptr.h
+++ b/include/linux/sockptr.h
@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ typedef struct {
 		void		*kernel;
 		void __user	*user;
 	};
-	bool		is_kernel : 1;
+	bool		is_kernel : 1,
+			is_bpf : 1;
 } sockptr_t;
 
 static inline bool sockptr_is_kernel(sockptr_t sockptr)
@@ -24,6 +25,11 @@ static inline bool sockptr_is_kernel(sockptr_t sockptr)
 	return sockptr.is_kernel;
 }
 
+static inline sockptr_t KERNEL_SOCKPTR_BPF(void *p)
+{
+	return (sockptr_t) { .kernel = p, .is_kernel = true, .is_bpf = true };
+}
+
 static inline sockptr_t KERNEL_SOCKPTR(void *p)
 {
 	return (sockptr_t) { .kernel = p, .is_kernel = true };
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 9e2539dcc293..2f913bdf0035 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1721,6 +1721,18 @@ static inline void unlock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk, bool slow)
 	}
 }
 
+static inline void lock_sock_sockopt(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval)
+{
+	if (!optval.is_bpf)
+		lock_sock(sk);
+}
+
+static inline void release_sock_sockopt(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval)
+{
+	if (!optval.is_bpf)
+		release_sock(sk);
+}
+
 /* Used by processes to "lock" a socket state, so that
  * interrupts and bottom half handlers won't change it
  * from under us. It essentially blocks any incoming
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 18bb4f269cf1..61d927a5f6cb 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -703,7 +703,9 @@ static int sock_setbindtodevice(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval, int optlen)
 			goto out;
 	}
 
-	return sock_bindtoindex(sk, index, true);
+	lock_sock_sockopt(sk, optval);
+	ret = sock_bindtoindex_locked(sk, index);
+	release_sock_sockopt(sk, optval);
 out:
 #endif
 
@@ -1067,7 +1069,7 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 
 	valbool = val ? 1 : 0;
 
-	lock_sock(sk);
+	lock_sock_sockopt(sk, optval);
 
 	switch (optname) {
 	case SO_DEBUG:
@@ -1496,7 +1498,7 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 		ret = -ENOPROTOOPT;
 		break;
 	}
-	release_sock(sk);
+	release_sock_sockopt(sk, optval);
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_setsockopt);
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-27  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-27  6:08 [PATCH bpf-next 00/14] bpf: net: Remove duplicated codes from bpf_setsockopt() Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  6:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/14] net: Change sock_setsockopt from taking sock ptr to sk ptr Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  8:11   ` David Laight
2022-07-27 20:42     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  8:16   ` Eric Dumazet
2022-07-27 18:50     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  6:09 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2022-07-27  8:36   ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/14] bpf: net: Avoid sock_setsockopt() taking sk lock when called from bpf David Laight
2022-07-27 20:05     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27 16:47   ` sdf
2022-07-27 18:37     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27 20:39       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-07-27 21:21         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27 21:38           ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-07-28  0:45             ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-28  1:49               ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-28 16:31                 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-28 16:56                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-28 17:20                     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-28 17:40                       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-29 10:04                     ` David Laight
2022-07-29 19:06                       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  6:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/14] bpf: net: Consider optval.is_bpf before capable check in sock_setsockopt() Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27 16:54   ` sdf
2022-07-27 18:47     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  6:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/14] bpf: net: Avoid do_tcp_setsockopt() taking sk lock when called from bpf Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  6:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/14] bpf: net: Avoid do_ip_setsockopt() " Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  6:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/14] bpf: net: Avoid do_ipv6_setsockopt() " Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  6:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/14] bpf: Embed kernel CONFIG check into the if statement in bpf_setsockopt Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  6:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/14] bpf: Change bpf_setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET) to reuse sock_setsockopt() Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  6:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/14] bpf: Refactor bpf specific tcp optnames to a new function Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  6:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/14] bpf: Change bpf_setsockopt(SOL_TCP) to reuse do_tcp_setsockopt() Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  6:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/14] bpf: Change bpf_setsockopt(SOL_IP) to reuse do_ip_setsockopt() Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  6:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/14] bpf: Change bpf_setsockopt(SOL_IPV6) to reuse do_ipv6_setsockopt() Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  6:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/14] bpf: Add a few optnames to bpf_setsockopt Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27  6:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/14] selftests/bpf: bpf_setsockopt tests Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-27 17:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/14] bpf: net: Remove duplicated codes from bpf_setsockopt() Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-27 20:42   ` Martin KaFai Lau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220727060909.2371812-1-kafai@fb.com \
    --to=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox