BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf
Date: Mon,  1 Aug 2022 10:39:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220801173926.2441748-2-sdf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220801173926.2441748-1-sdf@google.com>

Apparently, no existing selftest covers it. Add a new one where
we load cgroup/bind4 program and attach fentry to it.
Calling bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd on the fentry program
should return non-zero btf_id/btf_obj_id instead of crashing the kernel.

v2:
- use ret instead of err in find_prog_btf_id (Hao)
- remove verifier log (Hao)
- drop if conditional from ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(...)) (Hao)

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c  | 97 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c       | 12 +++
 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..eb06f522c0b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <bpf/btf.h>
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <network_helpers.h>
+#include "attach_to_bpf.skel.h"
+
+static int find_prog_btf_id(const char *name, __u32 attach_prog_fd)
+{
+	struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
+	__u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+	struct btf *btf;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(attach_prog_fd, &info, &info_len);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!info.btf_id)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	btf = btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(info.btf_id);
+	ret = libbpf_get_error(btf);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, name, BTF_KIND_FUNC);
+	btf__free(btf);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int load_fentry(int attach_prog_fd, int attach_btf_id)
+{
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts,
+		    .expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_FENTRY,
+		    .attach_prog_fd = attach_prog_fd,
+		    .attach_btf_id = attach_btf_id,
+	);
+	struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	};
+
+	return bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,
+			     "bind4_fentry",
+			     "GPL",
+			     insns,
+			     ARRAY_SIZE(insns),
+			     &opts);
+}
+
+void test_attach_to_bpf(void)
+{
+	struct attach_to_bpf *skel = NULL;
+	struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
+	__u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+	int cgroup_fd = -1;
+	int fentry_fd = -1;
+	int btf_id;
+
+	cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/attach_to_bpf");
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup_fd"))
+		return;
+
+	skel = attach_to_bpf__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	skel->links.bind4 = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind4, cgroup_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_program__attach_cgroup"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	btf_id = find_prog_btf_id("bind4", bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4));
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(btf_id, 0, "find_prog_btf_id"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	fentry_fd = load_fentry(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4), btf_id);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(fentry_fd, 0, "load_fentry"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* Make sure bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd works correctly when attaching
+	 * to another BPF program.
+	 */
+
+	ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fentry_fd, &info, &info_len),
+		  "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd");
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(info.btf_id, 0, "info.btf_id");
+	ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_id");
+	ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_obj_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");
+
+cleanup:
+	close(cgroup_fd);
+	close(fentry_fd);
+	attach_to_bpf__destroy(skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3f111fe96f8f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind4")
+int bind4(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-01 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-01 17:39 [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: use proper target btf when exporting attach_btf_obj_id Stanislav Fomichev
2022-08-01 17:39 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2022-08-01 19:33   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf Hao Luo
2022-08-02 16:24     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-08-01 21:43   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-02 16:21     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-08-02 18:42       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-02 20:53         ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-08-03  0:38           ` Andrii Nakryiko
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-08-03 16:32 [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: use proper target btf when exporting attach_btf_obj_id Stanislav Fomichev
2022-08-03 16:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf Stanislav Fomichev
2022-08-03 16:51   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-08-03 17:10     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-08-03 17:19       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-08-03 18:27         ` Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220801173926.2441748-2-sdf@google.com \
    --to=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox