From: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org,
Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: verifier cleanups
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 14:46:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220802214638.3643235-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com> (raw)
This patch cleans up a few things in the verifier:
* type_is_pkt_pointer():
Future work (skb + xdp dynptrs [0]) will be using the reg type
PTR_TO_PACKET | PTR_MAYBE_NULL. type_is_pkt_pointer() should return
true for any type whose base type is PTR_TO_PACKET, regardless of
flags attached to it.
* reg_type_may_be_refcounted_or_null():
Get the base type at the start of the function to avoid
having to recompute it / improve readability
* check_func_proto(): remove unnecessary 'meta' arg
* check_helper_call():
Use switch casing on the base type of return value instead of
nested ifs on the full type
There are no functional behavior changes.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220726184706.954822-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 096fdac70165..843a966cd02b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ static void verbose_invalid_scalar(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
static bool type_is_pkt_pointer(enum bpf_reg_type type)
{
+ type = base_type(type);
return type == PTR_TO_PACKET ||
type == PTR_TO_PACKET_META;
}
@@ -456,10 +457,9 @@ static bool reg_may_point_to_spin_lock(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
static bool reg_type_may_be_refcounted_or_null(enum bpf_reg_type type)
{
- return base_type(type) == PTR_TO_SOCKET ||
- base_type(type) == PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK ||
- base_type(type) == PTR_TO_MEM ||
- base_type(type) == PTR_TO_BTF_ID;
+ type = base_type(type);
+ return type == PTR_TO_SOCKET || type == PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK ||
+ type == PTR_TO_MEM || type == PTR_TO_BTF_ID;
}
static bool type_is_rdonly_mem(u32 type)
@@ -6498,8 +6498,7 @@ static bool check_btf_id_ok(const struct bpf_func_proto *fn)
return true;
}
-static int check_func_proto(const struct bpf_func_proto *fn, int func_id,
- struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
+static int check_func_proto(const struct bpf_func_proto *fn, int func_id)
{
return check_raw_mode_ok(fn) &&
check_arg_pair_ok(fn) &&
@@ -7218,7 +7217,7 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
memset(&meta, 0, sizeof(meta));
meta.pkt_access = fn->pkt_access;
- err = check_func_proto(fn, func_id, &meta);
+ err = check_func_proto(fn, func_id);
if (err) {
verbose(env, "kernel subsystem misconfigured func %s#%d\n",
func_id_name(func_id), func_id);
@@ -7359,13 +7358,17 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
/* update return register (already marked as written above) */
ret_type = fn->ret_type;
- ret_flag = type_flag(fn->ret_type);
- if (ret_type == RET_INTEGER) {
+ ret_flag = type_flag(ret_type);
+
+ switch (base_type(ret_type)) {
+ case RET_INTEGER:
/* sets type to SCALAR_VALUE */
mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
- } else if (ret_type == RET_VOID) {
+ break;
+ case RET_VOID:
regs[BPF_REG_0].type = NOT_INIT;
- } else if (base_type(ret_type) == RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) {
+ break;
+ case RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE:
/* There is no offset yet applied, variable or fixed */
mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
/* remember map_ptr, so that check_map_access()
@@ -7384,20 +7387,26 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
map_value_has_spin_lock(meta.map_ptr)) {
regs[BPF_REG_0].id = ++env->id_gen;
}
- } else if (base_type(ret_type) == RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET) {
+ break;
+ case RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET:
mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_SOCKET | ret_flag;
- } else if (base_type(ret_type) == RET_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON) {
+ break;
+ case RET_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON:
mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON | ret_flag;
- } else if (base_type(ret_type) == RET_PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK) {
+ break;
+ case RET_PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK:
mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK | ret_flag;
- } else if (base_type(ret_type) == RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM) {
+ break;
+ case RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM:
mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MEM | ret_flag;
regs[BPF_REG_0].mem_size = meta.mem_size;
- } else if (base_type(ret_type) == RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID) {
+ break;
+ case RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID:
+ {
const struct btf_type *t;
mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
@@ -7429,7 +7438,10 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
regs[BPF_REG_0].btf = meta.ret_btf;
regs[BPF_REG_0].btf_id = meta.ret_btf_id;
}
- } else if (base_type(ret_type) == RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID) {
+ break;
+ }
+ case RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID:
+ {
struct btf *ret_btf;
int ret_btf_id;
@@ -7450,7 +7462,9 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
}
regs[BPF_REG_0].btf = ret_btf;
regs[BPF_REG_0].btf_id = ret_btf_id;
- } else {
+ break;
+ }
+ default:
verbose(env, "unknown return type %u of func %s#%d\n",
base_type(ret_type), func_id_name(func_id), func_id);
return -EINVAL;
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2022-08-02 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-02 21:46 Joanne Koong [this message]
2022-08-03 8:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: verifier cleanups Jiri Olsa
2022-08-08 16:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220802214638.3643235-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--to=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox