BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kafai@fb.com, void@manifault.com, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org,
	Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: Fix ref_obj_id for dynptr data slices in verifier
Date: Tue,  9 Aug 2022 14:40:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220809214055.4050604-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com> (raw)

When a data slice is obtained from a dynptr (through the bpf_dynptr_data API),
the ref obj id of the dynptr must be found and then associated with the data
slice.

The ref obj id of the dynptr must be found *before* the caller saved regs are
reset. Without this fix, the ref obj id tracking is not correct for
dynptrs that are at an offset from the frame pointer.

Please also note that the data slice's ref obj id must be assigned after the
ret types are parsed, since RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM-type return regs get
zero-marked.

Fixes: 34d4ef5775f776ec4b0d53a02d588bf3195cada6 ("bpf: Add dynptr data slices");
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 01e7f48b4d8c..28b02dc67a2a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static bool is_ptr_cast_function(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
 		func_id == BPF_FUNC_skc_to_tcp_request_sock;
 }
 
-static bool is_dynptr_acquire_function(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
+static bool is_dynptr_ref_function(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
 {
 	return func_id == BPF_FUNC_dynptr_data;
 }
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ static bool helper_multiple_ref_obj_use(enum bpf_func_id func_id,
 		ref_obj_uses++;
 	if (is_acquire_function(func_id, map))
 		ref_obj_uses++;
-	if (is_dynptr_acquire_function(func_id))
+	if (is_dynptr_ref_function(func_id))
 		ref_obj_uses++;
 
 	return ref_obj_uses > 1;
@@ -7320,6 +7320,23 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
 			}
 		}
 		break;
+	case BPF_FUNC_dynptr_data:
+		for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS; i++) {
+			if (arg_type_is_dynptr(fn->arg_type[i])) {
+				if (meta.ref_obj_id) {
+					verbose(env, "verifier internal error: meta.ref_obj_id already set\n");
+					return -EFAULT;
+				}
+				/* Find the id of the dynptr we're tracking the reference of */
+				meta.ref_obj_id = stack_slot_get_id(env, &regs[BPF_REG_1 + i]);
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+		if (i == MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS) {
+			verbose(env, "verifier internal error: no dynptr in bpf_dynptr_data()\n");
+			return -EFAULT;
+		}
+		break;
 	}
 
 	if (err)
@@ -7457,7 +7474,7 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
 		return -EFAULT;
 	}
 
-	if (is_ptr_cast_function(func_id)) {
+	if (is_ptr_cast_function(func_id) || is_dynptr_ref_function(func_id)) {
 		/* For release_reference() */
 		regs[BPF_REG_0].ref_obj_id = meta.ref_obj_id;
 	} else if (is_acquire_function(func_id, meta.map_ptr)) {
@@ -7469,21 +7486,6 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
 		regs[BPF_REG_0].id = id;
 		/* For release_reference() */
 		regs[BPF_REG_0].ref_obj_id = id;
-	} else if (is_dynptr_acquire_function(func_id)) {
-		int dynptr_id = 0, i;
-
-		/* Find the id of the dynptr we're tracking the reference of */
-		for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS; i++) {
-			if (arg_type_is_dynptr(fn->arg_type[i])) {
-				if (dynptr_id) {
-					verbose(env, "verifier internal error: multiple dynptr args in func\n");
-					return -EFAULT;
-				}
-				dynptr_id = stack_slot_get_id(env, &regs[BPF_REG_1 + i]);
-			}
-		}
-		/* For release_reference() */
-		regs[BPF_REG_0].ref_obj_id = dynptr_id;
 	}
 
 	do_refine_retval_range(regs, fn->ret_type, func_id, &meta);
-- 
2.30.2


             reply	other threads:[~2022-08-09 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-09 21:40 Joanne Koong [this message]
2022-08-09 21:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: add extra test for using dynptr data slice after release Joanne Koong
2022-08-09 22:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: Fix ref_obj_id for dynptr data slices in verifier David Vernet
2022-08-10  1:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-08-10  1:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220809214055.4050604-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --to=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox