BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>
To: ast@kernel.org
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	jolsa@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Simplify code by using for_each_cpu_wrap()
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:08:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220817130807.68279-1-punit.agrawal@bytedance.com> (raw)

In the percpu freelist code, it is a common pattern to iterate over
the possible CPUs mask starting with the current CPU. The pattern is
implemented using a hand rolled while loop with the loop variable
increment being open-coded.

Simplify the code by replacing the while() loops with
for_each_cpu_wrap() helper to iterate over the possible cpus starting
with the current CPU. As a result, some of the special-casing in the
loop also gets simplified.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>
---
Hi,

I noticed an opportunity for simplifying the code while reviewing a
backport for one of the commits in this area.

Please consider merging.

Thanks,
Punit

 kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c | 42 ++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c b/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c
index 00b874c8e889..9dd9201c6f07 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.c
@@ -56,10 +56,9 @@ static inline bool pcpu_freelist_try_push_extra(struct pcpu_freelist *s,
 static inline void ___pcpu_freelist_push_nmi(struct pcpu_freelist *s,
 					     struct pcpu_freelist_node *node)
 {
-	int cpu, orig_cpu;
+	int cpu;
 
-	orig_cpu = cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-	while (1) {
+	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpu_possible_mask, raw_smp_processor_id()) {
 		struct pcpu_freelist_head *head;
 
 		head = per_cpu_ptr(s->freelist, cpu);
@@ -68,15 +67,10 @@ static inline void ___pcpu_freelist_push_nmi(struct pcpu_freelist *s,
 			raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
 			return;
 		}
-		cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
-		if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-			cpu = 0;
-
-		/* cannot lock any per cpu lock, try extralist */
-		if (cpu == orig_cpu &&
-		    pcpu_freelist_try_push_extra(s, node))
-			return;
 	}
+
+	/* cannot lock any per cpu lock, try extralist */
+	pcpu_freelist_try_push_extra(s, node);
 }
 
 void __pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist *s,
@@ -125,13 +119,12 @@ static struct pcpu_freelist_node *___pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
 {
 	struct pcpu_freelist_head *head;
 	struct pcpu_freelist_node *node;
-	int orig_cpu, cpu;
+	int cpu;
 
-	orig_cpu = cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-	while (1) {
+	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpu_possible_mask, raw_smp_processor_id()) {
 		head = per_cpu_ptr(s->freelist, cpu);
 		if (!READ_ONCE(head->first))
-			goto next_cpu;
+			continue;
 		raw_spin_lock(&head->lock);
 		node = head->first;
 		if (node) {
@@ -140,12 +133,6 @@ static struct pcpu_freelist_node *___pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
 			return node;
 		}
 		raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
-next_cpu:
-		cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
-		if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-			cpu = 0;
-		if (cpu == orig_cpu)
-			break;
 	}
 
 	/* per cpu lists are all empty, try extralist */
@@ -164,13 +151,12 @@ ___pcpu_freelist_pop_nmi(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
 {
 	struct pcpu_freelist_head *head;
 	struct pcpu_freelist_node *node;
-	int orig_cpu, cpu;
+	int cpu;
 
-	orig_cpu = cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-	while (1) {
+	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpu_possible_mask, raw_smp_processor_id()) {
 		head = per_cpu_ptr(s->freelist, cpu);
 		if (!READ_ONCE(head->first))
-			goto next_cpu;
+			continue;
 		if (raw_spin_trylock(&head->lock)) {
 			node = head->first;
 			if (node) {
@@ -180,12 +166,6 @@ ___pcpu_freelist_pop_nmi(struct pcpu_freelist *s)
 			}
 			raw_spin_unlock(&head->lock);
 		}
-next_cpu:
-		cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
-		if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-			cpu = 0;
-		if (cpu == orig_cpu)
-			break;
 	}
 
 	/* cannot pop from per cpu lists, try extralist */
-- 
2.35.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-08-17 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-17 13:08 Punit Agrawal [this message]
2022-08-17 16:41 ` [PATCH] bpf: Simplify code by using for_each_cpu_wrap() Alexei Starovoitov
2022-08-17 16:57   ` Punit Agrawal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220817130807.68279-1-punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
    --to=punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox