public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/5] bpf: expose bpf_{g,s}et_retval to more cgroup hooks
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:25:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220823222555.523590-1-sdf@google.com> (raw)

Apparently, only a small subset of cgroup hooks actually falls
back to cgroup_base_func_proto. This leads to unexpected result
where not all cgroup helpers have bpf_{g,s}et_retval.

It's getting harder and harder to manage which helpers are exported
to which hooks. We now have the following call chains:

- cg_skb_func_proto
  - sk_filter_func_proto
    - bpf_sk_base_func_proto
      - bpf_base_func_proto

So by looking at cg_skb_func_proto it's pretty hard to understand
what's going on.

For cgroup helpers, I'm proposing we do the following instead:

  func_proto = cgroup_common_func_proto();
  if (func_proto) return func_proto;

  /* optional, if hook has 'current' */
  func_proto = cgroup_current_func_proto();
  if (func_proto) return func_proto;

  ...

  switch (func_id) {
  /* hook specific helpers */
  case BPF_FUNC_hook_specific_helper:
    return &xyz;
  default:
    /* always fall back to plain bpf_base_func_proto */
    bpf_base_func_proto(func_id);
  }

If this turns out more workable, we can follow up with converting
the rest to the same pattern.

v5:
- remove net/cls_cgroup.h include from patch 1/5 (Martin)
- move endif changes from patch 1/5 to 3/5 (Martin)
- don't define __weak protos, the ones in core.c suffice (Martin)

v4:
- don't touch existing helper.c helpers (Martin)
- drop unneeded CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF in bpf_lsm_func_proto (Martin)

v3:
- expose strtol/strtoul everywhere (Martin)
- move helpers declarations from bpf.h to bpf-cgroup.h (Martin)
- revise bpf_{g,s}et_retval documentation (Martin)
- don't expose bpf_{g,s}et_retval to cg_skb hooks (Martin)

v2:
- move everything into kernel/bpf/cgroup.c instead (Martin)
- use cgroup_common_func_proto in lsm (Martin)

Stanislav Fomichev (5):
  bpf: Introduce cgroup_{common,current}_func_proto
  bpf: Use cgroup_{common,current}_func_proto in more hooks
  bpf: expose bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul to all program types
  bpf: update bpf_{g,s}et_retval documentation
  selftests/bpf: Make sure bpf_{g,s}et_retval is exposed everywhere

 include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h                    |  17 ++
 include/linux/bpf.h                           |   1 +
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |  22 ++-
 kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c                          |  17 +-
 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c                           | 157 +++++++++++++++---
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c                          |  40 +----
 net/core/filter.c                             |  80 ++++-----
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |  22 ++-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile          |   1 +
 .../bpf/cgroup_getset_retval_hooks.h          |  25 +++
 .../bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_getset_retval.c     |  48 ++++++
 .../bpf/progs/cgroup_getset_retval_hooks.c    |  16 ++
 12 files changed, 322 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/cgroup_getset_retval_hooks.h
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cgroup_getset_retval_hooks.c

-- 
2.37.1.595.g718a3a8f04-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2022-08-23 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-23 22:25 Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2022-08-23 22:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/5] bpf: Introduce cgroup_{common,current}_func_proto Stanislav Fomichev
2022-08-23 22:59   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-08-23 22:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/5] bpf: Use cgroup_{common,current}_func_proto in more hooks Stanislav Fomichev
2022-08-23 22:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/5] bpf: expose bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul to all program types Stanislav Fomichev
2022-08-23 22:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/5] bpf: update bpf_{g,s}et_retval documentation Stanislav Fomichev
2022-08-23 22:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/5] selftests/bpf: Make sure bpf_{g,s}et_retval is exposed everywhere Stanislav Fomichev
2022-08-23 23:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/5] bpf: expose bpf_{g,s}et_retval to more cgroup hooks patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220823222555.523590-1-sdf@google.com \
    --to=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox